Seòmar agus comataidhean

In healthcare settings, all incidents of restraint should be recorded and monitored at NHS Board level in line with their individual clinical governance procedures. The Mental Welfare Commission also have a role in publishing guidance in this area and in addressing individual cases following contact from patients, or as a result of their visits and themed reviews.

The Care Inspectorate gathers information on all incidents of restraint and reviews selected cases to ensure staff carrying out the restraint are fully trained and best practice is followed. They also inspect residential and secure care homes at least once each year, and restraint procedures are part of that inspection process.

In education settings, any use of physical intervention in schools, including restraint, must be recorded and monitored by local authorities. As part of their scrutiny and improvement roles in schools, Education Scotland inspectors consider the impact of practice in relation to the use of physical intervention, including restraint, for children and young people.

Information on the number of incidents of restraint and seclusion in these services are not collected at a national level by the Scottish Government.

To date 10 patients have requested referral to either Dr Veronikis or Professor Hashim. It is possible, however, that this number will increase once the contract arrangements with Dr Veronikis have been finalised and the formal referral pathways are in place.

For complex mesh removal surgery, case review by a specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT) is seen as pivotal in ensuring that all clinical considerations are taken into account in the planning of surgery which meets the needs of the patients. With the agreement of the independent providers, prior to referral, patients will be discussed by the MDT in Glasgow to ensure that they are fit for surgery and that all relevant diagnostic investigations have been undertaken. If, after careful consideration by both the MDT and the patient, it is agreed that surgery is appropriate and the patient wishes to be referred to either Dr Veronikis or Professor Hashim, the team in Glasgow will facilitate this in conjunction with their local specialist within their local Health Board who will then share in the ongoing care of the women following their surgery.

We recognise the impact long waiting times can have on a patient, from both a clinical and mental health perspective. At this stage in recovery from the pandemic, long-waiting patients must be considered a priority.

Work is underway, through the Care and Wellbeing Portfolio, to provide more active support to people whilst they are waiting for treatment. This will include the launch this summer of a national system that will provide information on waiting times by health board and by specialty.

More information on ‘waiting well’ and accessible services will also be made available for people to manage their conditions while they wait for treatment.

The contract negotiations with Dr Veronikis are progressing and are expected to reach a positive conclusion imminently. No patients can be referred until this process is complete, however referrals for those who wish to travel for treatment by Dr Veronikis will begin as soon as possible after the contract has been concluded. All negotiations with Spire Healthcare, Bristol are complete and contracts have been signed. For the small number of patients who have requested referral to Spire Healthcare, arrangements for referral are now beginning and it is anticipated that the first patients will travel for treatment shortly.

Anyone who wishes to be referred to either Dr Veronikis or Professor Hashim should firstly discuss their case with their GP who will refer them to the local specialist within their Health Board. If considered appropriate they would then be referred to the Complex Mesh Surgery Service for consideration by a full multi-disciplinary team (MDT). The MDT will undertake an appropriate clinical assessment and ensure that all relevant investigations are undertaken to support shared decision making. If, after careful consideration by both the MDT and the patient, it is agreed that surgery is appropriate and the patient wishes to be referred to either Dr Veronikis or Professor Hashim, the team in Glasgow will facilitate this in conjunction with their local specialist within their local Health Board.

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-08953 on 24 June 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-01935 on 24 June 2022. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers .

The scope for reform applies to all public bodies. After years of growth in the public sector, due to Brexit and the pandemic, we need to reset. We expect all public bodies to demonstrate that they remain fit for purpose against the present and future needs of Scotland’s people, places and communities. The spending review provides a platform for engagement ahead of the next budget. We do not intend to take the same approach as set out by the UK Government, but we do need to reshape and refocus. We will work together across the public sector to look creatively at reform in order to become more efficient and deliver better outcomes.

The Scottish Stroke Improvement Plan ( https://www.gov.scot/publications/stroke-improvement-plan/ ) outlines the requirements on NHS Boards to ensure they have a trained and competent workforce capable of delivering person-centred, safe and effective stroke care. The required level of education and training for members of staff is dependent upon on whether their contact with people affected by stroke is occasional, regular or in the context of specialist services.