Seòmar agus comataidhean

I refer the member to the answer to question S6W-11307 on‎ 24 October 2022. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers

The Scottish Government is working on production of the Islands Connectivity Plan. Priority is being given to a long-term plan and investment programme for vessels and ports, with the aim of publishing a draft for consultation by the end of 2022. There are no plans to carry out an assessment of the type mentioned by the Member.

The following table sets out the number of fatal casualties on the A90 between Emmock roundabout Dundee and where the A957 Slug Road crosses the A90 at Stonehaven.

An evidence based approach is central to the development of our policy to restrict promotions on less healthy food and drink.

We are using a wide range of evidence and data sources to consider the potential impacts of restricting promotions, ensuring we have a robust and balanced evidence base to inform policy making.

Evidence gathering remains ongoing and we continue to add to our evidence base and engage with a range of stakeholders. We are undertaking analysis to inform a suite of impact assessments in order to assess whether the proposed measures are proportionate as well as to consider their impact on health inequalities. These impact assessments will be published upon introduction to Parliament of the Public Health (Restriction of Promotions) Bill.

The Scottish Government deemed that the most sensitive way of investigating previous post-mortem practice in Scotland was the Independent Review Group on the Retention of Organs at Post Mortem Examination which was established in September 2000 by the then Scottish Executive. The final report was published in November 2001.

In addition, Audit Scotland was instructed by the then Auditor General for Scotland to undertake an exercise to validate the information provided to the Review Group by NHS trusts (now known as NHS boards). The Audit Scotland report summarises the findings from the validation exercise and the systems review undertaken during the period November 2001 to January 2002.

The Scottish Government wants to ensure that women are having informed and empowered conversations with their GP in order to support the diagnosis process for endometriosis. We continue to explore new ways and approaches to support people to seek advice in a way that best meets their needs, whilst also ensuring access to face-to-face appointments where required.

We recognise the benefits that virtual treatment tools like Near Me could bring to many of those suffering with endometriosis and the potential impact they could have on diagnosis delays. Near Me is a confidential and secure service that allows people to attend a pre-arranged appointment using a video call, rather than attending in person. However, we are clear that where clinically necessary, face-to-face consultations will be available to those who need them.

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the imposition of Infection Prevention Control (IPC) measures in order to contain its spread. These IPC measures, which have recently been deescalated, changed the way GPs see their patients. The Scottish Government wants to see greater availability of face-to-face appointments and is working with the British Medical Association (BMA) and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) to ensure this happens as quickly as possible.

We will continue to support the health and care system through what is anticipated to be an extremely challenging winter, including supporting GPs to offer an appropriate mix of pre-booked, same day, face to face and remote appointments. Additionally, the NHS Inform pages on endometriosis have recently been reviewed and updated, in collaboration with endometriosis specialists and those with lived experience, to ensure that people across Scotland are able to access accurate and up-to-date information on endometriosis in a range of languages and formats.

An evidence based approach is central to the development of our policy to restrict promotions on less healthy food and drink.

Further to our 2018/19 consultation , we recently consulted again on our proposals on restricting the promotions for foods high in fat, sugar or salt to further inform the evidence base and development of this policy. This provided an opportunity for people and organisations to share their views on these proposals in the current context, including relating to cost of living pressures. Responses to this consultation are now being analysed and will help to inform development of this policy.

We continue to engage with a range of stakeholders and update our wider evidence base to inform a suite of impact assessments in order to assess whether the proposed measures are proportionate as well as to consider their impact on health inequalities. This includes engagement with businesses to inform a Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment that will set out the anticipated costs and benefits of these measures. These impact assessments will be published upon introduction to Parliament of the Public Health (Restriction of Promotions) Bill.

The next meeting with the UK Government Department for Transport is scheduled for 31 October 2022. Discussions will cover proposed investment for the A75 only as the Final Union Connectivity Review Report, published in November 2021, did not recommended that the UK Government commit funding to support the upgrade of the A77. To date, the UK Government has committed no funding to upgrading the A75.

The last meeting between the Scottish Government and the UK Government Department for Transport to specifically discuss the Union Connectivity Review’s recommendation for investment in the A75 was on 16 June 2022.

The Union Connectivity Review made no recommendations on upgrading the A77. Discussions between Scottish and UK Government officials have therefore focused solely on the A75. In March 2022, Transport Scotland officials had an initial discussion with UK Government Department for Transport (DfT) counterparts, on the A75. Follow up was undertaken by DfT officials and TS officials on a number of specific clarification questions, with a further meeting held on 16 June.

A subsequent discussion is scheduled for 31 October which will cover UCR recommendations and associated proposed funding for the A75.