- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20835 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 January 2019, whether a copy of each review has been lodged with its Programme and Project Management Centre of Expertise (PPM-CoE) so that it can identify and share the generic lessons learned and, if so, whether the PPM-CoE has copied summaries of the review recommendations to the relevant accountable officer.
Answer
Each review has been lodged with the Programme and Project Management Centre of Expertise (PPM-CoE) and copied to the relevant Accountable Officer.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 17 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20835 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 16 January 2019, whether any of the reviews have been made available by their respective senior responsible officer (a) internally and (b) to the Social Security Programme Board and, if so, which reviews.
Answer
The reviews are confidential to the Senior Responsible Owner and have been shared with select internal colleagues.
The November 2017 review was shared with the Social Security Programme Board.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20558 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what alternatives to accessing DWP data it has considered in order to mitigate the two-child benefit cap, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its answer.
Answer
The two child limit is a UK Government policy which the Scottish Government has repeatedly called for to be scrapped. The changes announced by the UK Government last week show that it too now finally accepts that the policy is unfair. It should therefore scrap the cap for all families.
The Scottish Government plans to spend over £125m in 2018-19 mitigating the impact of UK Government welfare cuts and on measures to help protect people on low incomes. In 2020/21 UK Government cuts including the two child cap are expected to take around £3.7 billion out of the Scottish welfare system- with £92m in 2020-21 due to the two child limit and the Scottish Government cannot be expected to continually mitigate to fill that gap.
It is the policy of the Scottish Government to continue to call for the two child limit to be scrapped for all families. The Scottish Government would not request information from the DWP on mitigation as this is not an SG policy.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to questions S5W-20555, S5W-20556 and S5W-20558 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether its statement that the policy “is a fully reserved benefit the Scottish Government has have no control over and cannot change” refers to the two-child benefit cap in particular or universal credit generally, and whether it considers that the statement reflects its powers over universal credit flexibilities or to top up reserved benefits.
Answer
The Scottish Government has very limited administrative flexibilities over Universal Credit. These are laid out in the Scotland Act 2016, giving Scottish Ministers the power to change when and to whom Universal Credit is paid, and to vary the amount of housing costs included in the award. We have used these to good effect by introducing the Universal Credit Scottish choices. This does not, however, change the fact that Universal Credit remains reserved to the UK Government and with it the two child limit policy which we do not have the power to remove.
Having top up powers doesn’t mean we can change the benefit. The two child limit and rape clause will remain in place because these are the policy choices the UK Government has made and it is only right that they are the ones to take action to fix this.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20556 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding when it requested access to DWP data for the purposes of mitigating the two-child benefit cap, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its answer.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-20880 on 24 January 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 10 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20555 by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 8 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what (a) discussions it has had with and (b) information it has sought from the UK Government regarding mitigation of the two-child benefit cap, and for what reason it did not provide this information in its answer.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-20880 on 24 January 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20752 by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, how it will calculate the verified financial gain per (a) individual, (b) household and (c) benefit, and over what period of time it will assume the gain is for.
Answer
Citizens Advice Scotland will calculate the financial gain as the amount of any lump sum or the sum of any payments into the household, or reductions in payments out of the household, up to a maximum of 12 months.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government further to the answer to question S5W-20745, by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, how it defines (a) a successful and (b) an unsuccessful evaluation.
Answer
The target set for the service is to deliver a Financial Health Check to 15,000 households in Scotland per annum. We will monitor the quarterly update reports provided by Citizens Advice Scotland to gauge whether the service is successful. Our decision will be based on the data submitted for the following agreed key performance indicators:
Number of clients accessing the service
Profile of clients
Client financial gain
Client satisfaction
Client financial confidence
Improved mental health as a result of the check.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20751, by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, for what reason it does not plan to publish the service level agreement.
Answer
It is not standard Scottish Government policy practice to publish grant funding applications and grant offer letters given that information contained in these documents may be commercially sensitive.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 January 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 24 January 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20757, by Aileen Campbell on 15 January 2019, whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding what procurement process was conducted for the provision of its Financial Health Check service.
Answer
The service was not procured. It is grant funded.