- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 27 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what advice it has sought, or intends to seek, with the Committee on Climate Change regarding the national planning framework, and whether it will publish this advice.
Answer
As consultations on the second National Planning Framework preceded the formal establishment of the Committee on Climate Change, the opportunity to seek advice from the committee on the framework''s content was not available. The Scottish Government''s climate change targets will be an important consideration in revising the National Planning Framework and we will consult widely when the time comes to review it. Advice received from the Committee on Climate Change by the Scottish Government on any subject would be published.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 27 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what advice it has sought, or intends to seek, with the Committee on Climate Change regarding the proposals for a new coal-fired power station at Hunterston, and whether it will publish this advice.
Answer
Given the role of Scottish ministers in determining this application it would be inappropriate to comment on its specifics at this stage. A decision will be made on this application in due course.
Advice received from the Committee on Climate Change by the Scottish Government on any subject would be published.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 16 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 24 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive when the Disability Working Group last met; what plans there are for future meetings, and what role the group has in informing policy on disability.
Answer
The Disability Working Group was established by ministers as a strategic short-term group in 2004, following the European Year of Disabled People (EYDP) in 2003. The remit of the group was:
to establish priorities for the Scottish Government and partner organisations to promote equality for disabled people in Scotland, and to
develop proposals on longer term mechanisms for engagement with the disability sector.
The report of the Disability Working Group, and the Scottish Government Response to the report, were published in November 2006, and the last meeting of the group was in September 2007.
The Scottish Government has since taken forward work on Disability Equality through the high-level Independent Living In Scotland Core Reference Group, which has a much broader and more ambitious remit than the original Disability Working Group. The main remit of the group, which has formally met five times to date since September 2009, is to:
Consider the actions necessary to progress Independent Living for disabled people, and to support their involvement in this process.
l
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to consult on the future use of the additional capacity in the rail network between Glasgow and Paisley.
Answer
We can confirm that there will be consultation on the revisions to the Ayrshire and Inverclyde rail passenger timetables, brought about as a consequence of the additional capacity arising from the Paisley Corridor Improvements project. This process has not yet commenced although it is envisaged that this will happen late autumn 2010 to enable implementation during the course of the winter 2011 timetable revision. As you will be aware there is a requirement for timetable options to have been worked up to a sufficient level of detail to demonstrate that they are: operationally and economically viable; and in the case of timetables for the Scotrail franchise, that they accord with the wider aspirations of the Scottish Government in delivering its overarching purpose, to increase sustainable economic growth, before they are taken to consultation.
The consultation process referred to is the standard industry process related to the development and implementation of changes / revisions to passenger rail services. As is industry practice the consultation will involve key industry stakeholders (e.g. Network Rail, Regional Transport Partnerships (RTP) etc) and rail user groups (e.g. Passenger Focus). These stakeholders do have the rail user''s interests at the foremost of their minds and due to their composition, e.g. as RTPs have local councillors sitting on their various committees, they are generally seen as representing the views of local constituents.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the proposed rail timetable for Ayrshire and Inverclyde passenger services will require changes to the Glasgow Airport Rail Link Act 2007.
Answer
No. The Glasgow Airport Rail Link Act (2007) authorises the construction and subsequent maintenance of certain specified authorised works associated with railway infrastructure. Operational railway timetables are a matter for Network Rail Infrastructure Limited under the network code.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 July 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 9 August 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it expects local authorities to fund support services for disabled people who (a) reside in the local authority area or (b) come from the local authority area but reside in another.
Answer
The Scottish Government expects all local authorities to have a range of services in place to meet the needs of its local population.
Under the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968, Scottish local authorities have a duty to provide community care services within their area. Eligibility for such services arises from the physical presence of an individual in the local authority area and from that individual being assessed as having a need that calls for the provision of a service.
A local authority may, therefore, be responsible for providing care to someone in its area who is ordinarily resident elsewhere. Section 86 of the 1968 Act and related regulations provide for certain expenditure incurred in so doing to be recoverable from the local authority in whose area the individual is ordinarily resident.
In a similar way Scottish Government expects local authorities to meet the housing support needs of all individuals currently living in their area but, where relevant, to be able to claim back such expenses from the local authority in which the individual ordinarily resides.
A circular published by the Scottish Government in March 2010 contains revised guidance on ordinary residence in relation to the recovery of the expenditure on accommodation and services provided under the 1968 Act and can be found at the following link (Circular CCD 3/2010). It contains guidance only and is not intended to be a definitive interpretation of the law, which is a matter for the Courts. Local authorities are, however, encouraged to follow the guidance to help achieve consistency and equity across Scotland.
The guidance also sets out new procedures for resolving disputes when local authorities cannot reach agreement as to which local authority is liable for the costs, and proposes transitional arrangements to help with voluntary moves.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 July 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what information will be available to it to inform its decision on any proposal from the Scottish Funding Council to merge Glasgow Metropolitan College, the Glasgow College of Nautical Studies and Central College, Glasgow.
Answer
The proposal to merge has been made to ministers by the colleges themselves. Ministers will consider the detailed merger proposal document submitted by the colleges and the advice of the Scottish Funding Council, which has a statutory duty to advise ministers. Ministers will consider the range of views and comments received in response to their own public consultation launched in December 2009. Ministers will also consider responses to the separate consultation exercise undertaken by the colleges themselves, as well as any other representations which have been made to ministers since these consultations closed.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 July 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how much of the information used by it to inform its decision on any proposal from the Scottish Funding Council to merge Glasgow Metropolitan College, the Glasgow College of Nautical Studies and Central College, Glasgow will be made public.
Answer
We will be happy to make available all information upon which Ministers base their decision, with the exception of information which might be exempt under freedom of information legislation.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 July 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to conduct a public consultation exercise to examine the merits of any proposal from the Scottish Funding Council to merge Glasgow Metropolitan College, the Glasgow College of Nautical Studies and Central College, Glasgow.
Answer
Ministers launched a public consultation exercise on the prospect of the merger on 21 December 2009. Ministers are also aware of the outcome of the separate consultation exercise undertaken by the colleges concerned. Ministers have received since then a range of further views and representations on the proposed merger, all of which will be taken into account by ministers in reaching their decision.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 June 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Keith Brown on 23 June 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many miles it expects primary school children to walk to school before being offered transport.
Answer
Authorities have a duty under the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 to make such arrangements as they consider necessary for the transport between home and school of pupils residing, and attending schools, in their area. In considering whether to make arrangements, authorities are required to have regard to the safety of the pupil.
The statutory provisions on school transport prescribe neither distances beyond which authorities must, nor distances below which they must not, provide transport. It is, however, for authorities themselves to determine criteria for eligibility for free school transport.