- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-29261 by Mr Jim Wallace on 14 October 2002, whether it will, as part of the costing of the proposed new 700-place private prison, include costings for all aspects involved in the transportation of remand prisoners to the prison.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:We do not anticipate that the contract for the new prison will include transport of prisoners, as that will be subject to our separate contractual arrangements for prisoner escorts.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 8 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27655 by Mr Jim Wallace on 29 October 2002, what the grounds were for each financial penalty incurred by Medacs and what the value of each such financial penalty was since the beginning of the contract.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The annual value of financial penalties imposed was provided in answer to question S1W-27655. The value of each individual penalty is commercially confidential. The data on performance specification will be made available when the Medacs contract is published in due course following discussion with the company.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 8 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-27655 by Mr Jim Wallace on 29 October 2002, what the proportion of the financial penalty incurred by Medacs was to the value of the contract for each financial year since the contract with Medacs was made.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The cost of the contract in each year is commercially confidential. It is therefore not possible to provide the proportion to that figure of the amounts given in reply to question S1W-27655.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 7 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has commissioned an audit of sheriff courts on the cost to them of conforming to the requirements under disability legislation for access by disabled people to public buildings; when this audit was commissioned; whether it has published or will publish the audit on completion; what funding the Scottish Courts Administration has received to enable access to sheriff courts to comply with the legislation; how much has been allocated to each court, and when such allocation was made.
Answer
I have asked John Ewing, Chief Executive of Scottish Court Service to respond. His response is as follows:The Scottish Court Service commissioned access consultants to undertake an audit of the court estate to determine the scale and extent of work required throughout the estate to ensure compliance with Part 3 of the Disability Discrimination Act. That process identified a number of areas where the consultants believed that modification of the court estate could be beneficial to courts users with a disability. These recommendations are currently being examined to determine their feasibility and cost of implementation. There are no plans to publish the audit results. Details of the resources for the Scottish Court Service were published in the Building a Better Scotland - Spending Proposals 2003-2006: What the Money Buys. Additional funds have been made available to enable the Scottish Court Service to accommodate pressures on its capital programme. This funding will, in part, be used to provide improved facilities for the disabled in the court estate. The cost of the programme of works required is being assessed. Funds have not been specifically allocated to individual court buildings as the programme of works will be developed and implemented on an estate wide basis.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 29 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 7 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-30213 by Cathy Jamieson on 16 October 2002, why it has no survey data more recent than 1998 on young people held in secure accommodation.
Answer
The 1998 survey collected detailed information on each resident in secure accommodation and the care they received. This census has been repeated during October 2002, and the results will be made available in due course. In addition, the Executive collects and publishes basic information annually from secure care providers on the characteristics of children and their care. The last figures were published on 2 September covering the year 2000-01 at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00191-00.asp. This information was another source used to consider the supply and demand for secure care places.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 28 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Simpson on 7 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive when the legal aid exemption limit in most matrimonial cases was first set at #2,500; when it was first announced that this limit would rise to #4,200, and when this increase will come into force.
Answer
The capital disregard from winnings in matrimonial cases was first set at £2,500 in 1987. I announced the Executive's intention to increase the exemption limit to £4,200 on 13 March. The increase has now been incorporated in the replacement set of civil legal aid regulations which I have just laid in the Parliament and which will come into force on 1 December.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 7 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what measures it is taking to attract young people to live and work in rural areas.
Answer
Our vision for rural Scotland, published in May 2000, stressed the importance of improving the lives of all those living in rural areas. This included our determination to ensure that our rural areas attract and retain young people to live and work there - to ensure that "getting on need not mean going away". To realise that vision, we have in place a range of measures across all Scottish Executive portfolios.We are increasing employment opportunities through support for rural economic development, improving the provision of child care and school education in rural areas, and increasing opportunities for further and higher education. We are tackling social exclusion, improving the provision of transport in rural areas and improving housing conditions through our community ownership programme. For example, the proposed transfer of Scottish Borders Council's housing to Scottish Borders Housing Association will generate around £82 million investment in the first 10 years to repair and modernise the housing stock. The knock-on effect of this substantial investment is expected to be more local jobs and training opportunities.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 6 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many community social work places on average have been unfilled in (a) 1999-2000, (b) 2000-01, (c) 2001-02 and (d) 2002-03 to date, broken down by local authority.
Answer
These figures are not held centrally.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 August 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 4 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to the Scottish Prison Service targets for standards of routine and psychiatric care as they apply to HM Prison and Young Offenders' Institution Cornton Vale, what steps it has taken in regard to the targets of (a) routine cases referred to psychiatrists within 4 weeks in 100% of cases being only "partially achieved" and what percentage of cases this currently refers to and (b) emergency psychiatric cases being seen within 24 hours in 100% of cases being "not achieved" and what percentage of cases in this category have been seen by an emergency psychiatrist in 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03 to date.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The factual information requested is not available. Discussions are on-going with Forth Valley Primary Care NHS Trust about how appropriate psychiatric services might continue to be made available within Cornton Vale.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 13 September 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 4 November 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the ministerial statement on the prison estates review by the Deputy First Minister and Minister for Justice on 5 September 2002, whether it has made any assessment of the impact an increase in funding of bail supervision services would have on the number of remand prisoners.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-29259 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa. As indicated in the earlier reply, it is too early to discern to what extent increased funding of bail supervision schemes might impact on the numbers of prisoners being sent for remand.