The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2643 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
The Arran no-take zone has seen tourism grow while scallop and lobster numbers have increased four-fold. Given that economic success, how does the Government plan to continue to work with the Community of Arran Seabed Trust—COAST—to collect further data on the impact of that internationally recognised no-take zone?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
What about the infrastructure that we need to develop that? There are some big figures in there, but it is a nascent technology and we do not have much in the way of infrastructure at the moment. What infrastructure do we need to put in place between now and 2030?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I am interested to know where the work with stakeholders on developing a vision for hydrogen and the hydrogen industry is now. It is quite clear to me that there is a prioritisation of the use of hydrogen in the energy strategy. There is a hydrogen ladder. My reading of the strategy is that the future will be less about using hydrogen to heat showers in the morning and much more about decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors in industry. On the back of the energy strategy, how are you developing a stakeholder vision for what the hydrogen economy will look like in 2030 and 2045?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I suppose that the regulations have come about because of our greater understanding of what is happening in the natural world and how the greenhouse gas inventory is changing over time. Do you anticipate any other changes being made in later years? I know that our understanding of blue carbon, for example, is increasing, although that is currently outside of the inventory; we do not really account for it. Could this be a game changer in increasing our understanding of the science? Might there be an impact further down the line? Is there any sense of that in the international debate within the science community?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
On the supply chain, I have heard feedback from parts of the renewable energy industry that, although there are strong targets and a strong ambition in the energy strategy and just transition plan, there is perhaps not a clear pathway towards development of the supply chain or a clear focus on which bits of the supply chain that we want to develop. Might that come on the back of the energy strategy and just transition plan, or are you looking at changing that as a result of the consultation and feedback? I am trying to work out where the issue of supply chain development sits. The Japanese announcement is incredibly welcome, but where does that sit within a wider plan for a supply chain for the offshore industry?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
That will be useful. Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
Okay. On funding, there has been discussion in the chamber about the Scottish Government’s contribution, particularly with the emerging energy technologies fund. Can you provide some clarity about what the funding for carbon capture, utilisation and storage might look like and how that relates to the UK Government’s commitment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
The flip side is that, if blue carbon was brought into the inventory, that might affect the targets but it might also provide solutions, such as blue carbon marine protected areas and seagrass or kelp restoration. As well as having to account for an entirely new part of our biosphere in our thinking on the inventory, that might open up opportunities for progress.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
Were particular lessons learned from the Beauly to Denny project, which took forever to get through? Landscape-scale mitigations were put in place, communities came forward to seek reductions in the wirescape in their surrounding areas and substations were moved, so some benefits flew from the project as well. Is that feeding into the current thinking? We have been here before with the Beauly to Denny project, where there were debates about undergrounding and everything else.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the issue of community benefit for windfarms. When a lot of the windfarms were being developed in the early noughties, the community benefit payment levels were set quite low. Sometimes, the level is set at around £1,000 a megawatt. Some of those windfarms are seeking to expand or they are repowering. Is that an opportunity to dramatically increase the amount of money that communities are getting per megawatt from those projects as they seek to expand and become more efficient?