Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 26 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2643 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 10 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

The Arran no-take zone has seen tourism grow while scallop and lobster numbers have increased four-fold. Given that economic success, how does the Government plan to continue to work with the Community of Arran Seabed Trust—COAST—to collect further data on the impact of that internationally recognised no-take zone?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

What about the infrastructure that we need to develop that? There are some big figures in there, but it is a nascent technology and we do not have much in the way of infrastructure at the moment. What infrastructure do we need to put in place between now and 2030?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

I am interested to know where the work with stakeholders on developing a vision for hydrogen and the hydrogen industry is now. It is quite clear to me that there is a prioritisation of the use of hydrogen in the energy strategy. There is a hydrogen ladder. My reading of the strategy is that the future will be less about using hydrogen to heat showers in the morning and much more about decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors in industry. On the back of the energy strategy, how are you developing a stakeholder vision for what the hydrogen economy will look like in 2030 and 2045?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

I suppose that the regulations have come about because of our greater understanding of what is happening in the natural world and how the greenhouse gas inventory is changing over time. Do you anticipate any other changes being made in later years? I know that our understanding of blue carbon, for example, is increasing, although that is currently outside of the inventory; we do not really account for it. Could this be a game changer in increasing our understanding of the science? Might there be an impact further down the line? Is there any sense of that in the international debate within the science community?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

On the supply chain, I have heard feedback from parts of the renewable energy industry that, although there are strong targets and a strong ambition in the energy strategy and just transition plan, there is perhaps not a clear pathway towards development of the supply chain or a clear focus on which bits of the supply chain that we want to develop. Might that come on the back of the energy strategy and just transition plan, or are you looking at changing that as a result of the consultation and feedback? I am trying to work out where the issue of supply chain development sits. The Japanese announcement is incredibly welcome, but where does that sit within a wider plan for a supply chain for the offshore industry?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

That will be useful. Thank you.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

Okay. On funding, there has been discussion in the chamber about the Scottish Government’s contribution, particularly with the emerging energy technologies fund. Can you provide some clarity about what the funding for carbon capture, utilisation and storage might look like and how that relates to the UK Government’s commitment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

The flip side is that, if blue carbon was brought into the inventory, that might affect the targets but it might also provide solutions, such as blue carbon marine protected areas and seagrass or kelp restoration. As well as having to account for an entirely new part of our biosphere in our thinking on the inventory, that might open up opportunities for progress.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

Were particular lessons learned from the Beauly to Denny project, which took forever to get through? Landscape-scale mitigations were put in place, communities came forward to seek reductions in the wirescape in their surrounding areas and substations were moved, so some benefits flew from the project as well. Is that feeding into the current thinking? We have been here before with the Beauly to Denny project, where there were debates about undergrounding and everything else.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Electricity Infrastructure Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 May 2023

Mark Ruskell

I want to go back to the issue of community benefit for windfarms. When a lot of the windfarms were being developed in the early noughties, the community benefit payment levels were set quite low. Sometimes, the level is set at around £1,000 a megawatt. Some of those windfarms are seeking to expand or they are repowering. Is that an opportunity to dramatically increase the amount of money that communities are getting per megawatt from those projects as they seek to expand and become more efficient?