The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5056 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
Picking up on that point about training, the requirement for trap operators to complete training is similar to the approach that the Government has implemented for the use of snares. Some respondents noted in their evidence that more than 3,000 individuals have undergone the training to operate snares and that only three have failed. How will the legislation ensure that the training programmes are robust and effective at ending bad practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
Can you give any examples of the kinds of cases with which the SSPCA has usefully assisted Police Scotland in the past?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
I have questions for you now, Fionna Kell, and, as I said, you can pick up on anything else that we have covered previously.
The Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government wrote to the committee in March 2023, stating that agreement on the safer building accord could not be reached as there was
“an unwillingness of developers to accept the need to work to legal Scottish Building Standards.”
I am interested to know whether that is correct and, if so, how the dispute was overcome.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thanks very much. That is very helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much for that, Annie.
Fionna Kell wants to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
I would also be interested to hear an outline, in broad terms, of what is meant by the in-principle agreement on the safer building accord that you reached with the developers.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
I want to come back to the need to look at legislation. Can you say a bit more about that? Is it legislation on tenure?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
I want to come back to the technical questions. In the previous panel, it was interesting to hear from Chris Ashurst and Fionna Kell about risk. At the moment, we have a system in which the grading is high or low, with nothing in between, but there are buildings where the risk is, possibly, lower and the way in which we should assess them might need to be different. Are you considering that and taking it on board?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
I am glad to hear of your awareness and that that is part of your discussions.
10:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2023
Ariane Burgess
You would not get on the wrong side of me, minister. It was directed at my colleague Miles Briggs. It is just that there is another convener in the Parliament who uses his pen to get the members to wind up, and I thought that I perhaps need to start using that code as well. [Laughter.]
We have gone over our time, but one thing that concerns me is orphan buildings. I am thinking not so much about the past, but about the future. Do we have something in place, or are we going to put something in place to address that? If a company goes out of business, we will get an orphan building. Are there measures that we can put in place to make sure that buildings can be reassessed? When we talked about the subject last year, I think that it was Chris Ashurst who brought up the idea of an MOT. Is there something that we can do to ensure that, when a developer builds a building, we can always link it back and check up on them so that we do not end up with orphan buildings?