Seòmar agus comataidhean

Okay. Thank you. Andrea Bradley, can we have your comments?

Does Lindsay Paterson have a point?

I think that it was Greg Dempster who mentioned the black box, and he wants to answer your question.

Greg Dempster has a further comment.

I call Oliver Mundell, who is participating remotely. We will not have the privilege of seeing Oliver, because he has broadband problems; we will only hear him.

Can you repeat the last question, Oliver?

The SQA had a function to carry out, so there is still a need for such a body, hence your recommendation that a new body be created. It sounds to me that we are really talking about culture. The organisation’s culture had gone wrong—it had gone adrift. Culture is ultimately the responsibility of the SQA’s leadership. Has the leadership of the SQA sailed the boat on to the rocks?

You rightly point out that one of the concerns that has been expressed—you address it in your report—is that a new body should not be simply a rebranded SQA, given the issues that you have raised.

However, you would suggest that it would be a bad move to simply rehire the SQA’s existing senior leadership team for the new body, as that would undermine the confidence that people might have in the new body. Is that a fair comment?

It has been reported to me that staff at the SQA feel similarly about the senior leadership and their tin-eared approach to staff concerns.