- Asked by: Rhoda Grant, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that increasing the Scottish Land Fund significantly in the early years of the current parliamentary session will be the most effective way of ensuring that communities can compete for the ownership of land, given that there is an increasing number of wealthy private owners expressing interest in buying land.
Answer
We are committed to increasing the Scottish Land Fund (SLF) to £20m by the end of this parliament and the profile for this is currently being considered as part of the ongoing budget.
The SLF provides important support to communities and between 2016 and 2021, 232 groups were awarded a total of £39m. However, it is not the only source of funding available and we would encourage any community to consider all avenues when seeking to fund acquisition.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 25 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom Arthur on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how much has been (a) unallocated, and (b) underspent from each fund it has announced to the Parliament, in each year since 2007.
Answer
The provisional HMT fiscal underspend against total budget, for each funding type, in each year since 2007 is summarised in the following table:
Table: 2007-08 to 2020-21 Provisional Outturn Variances Comparison – HM Treasury Budgets
| Resource | Capital | Financial |
| | | Transactions |
| £million | £million | £million |
| | | |
2020-21 | (374) | (8) | (67) |
2019-20 | (86) | (76) | (96) |
2018-19 | (305)* | (23)* | (121) |
2017-18 | (358) | (84) | (11) |
2016-17 | (98) | (40) | (53) |
2015-16 | (75) | (40) | (40) |
2014-15 | (151) | (41) | (12) |
2013-14 | (144) | (1) | (31) |
2012-13 | (150) | (29) | - |
2011-12 | (149) | (30) | - |
2010-11 | (10) | (2) | - |
2009-10 | (116) | (3) | - |
2008-09 | (121) | (3) | - |
2007-08 | (40) | (2) | - |
* Including £126 million of fiscal resource and £22 million of fiscal capital of late Barnett consequentials re-allocated by HM Treasury to 2019-20
It is important to note that there is no loss of spending power as a result of these underspends and all have been carried forward in full through to the next financial year either through the Scotland Reserve or the Budget Exchange (year-end flexibility mechanism prior to the Reserve being introduced in 2017-18).
Further details of outturn by individual portfolio, compared to the Budget authorised by the Scottish Parliament, can be found in the published annual Scottish Government consolidated accounts for the relevant financial year.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 22 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the Cairngorms National Park Authority reporting a possible decline of a third of the population of capercaillie.
Answer
The reports of a possible decline in the capercaillie population are concerning and underline the need to continue to focus efforts on partnership work to tackle threats to the species. We recognise the central importance of biodiversity and our commitment to addressing the twin challenges of biodiversity loss and climate change is unwavering.
We are taking action to address the decline in capercaillie by providing specific support from the forestry grant scheme with funding of over £300,000 between 2016 and 2025, as well as funding of £780,000 through the previous rural priority scheme’s capercaillie package.
NatureScot is also supporting the Cairngorms Capercaillie Project, which is piloting innovative community-led capercaillie conservation. Empowering local communities to develop solutions to recreation management in capercaillie woods is a new approach that has real potential to help the birds. NatureScot will also review the scientific evidence on the key factors affecting capercaillie and feed this into its work with all project partners going forward.
- Asked by: Maurice Golden, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-00666 by Mairi McAllan on 24 June 2021, what its response is to the statement in Scotland’s Marine Assessment 2020, in the section on microplastics in surface water, that “a baseline does not yet exist for microplastics so a trend analysis is not possible”, and what steps it will take to establish one.
Answer
The Scottish Government microplastics monitoring programme began in 2013, and has undertaken annual surveys since that time. There have been nearly 400 locations sampled between 2013 and 2020. There is currently an insufficient data series to determine if a trend exists or to be able to say when a baseline may be determined. However annual surveys continue to gather data, in order to work toward determining a baseline and/or trends.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how much it has invested in the roll-out of new fibre infrastructure in each year since 2016.
Answer
Delivery of new fibre infrastructure is a key component part of a number of Scottish Government digital infrastructure programmes. It is therefore not possible to single out the costs solely attributed to fibre infrastructure.
The level of capital investment in digital infrastructure in each financial year since 2015-16 is provided in the following table:
Financial Year | Total (£m) |
2015-16 | £68.9 |
2016-17 | £54.9 |
2017-18 | £66.2 |
2018-19 | £27.1 |
2019-20 | £18.0 |
2020-21 | £21.6 |
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with Falkirk Council regarding the implementation of the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009.
Answer
Reducing flood risk is a priority for this Government and we will continue to support authorities to deliver actions that protect our communities. The Scottish Government engages regularly with local authorities, including Falkirk Council, on a wide range of flood risk management issues to ensure Scotland is resilient to the challenges of flood risk and climatic pressures.
Flood Risk Management Strategies and Plans are published every six years, as part of the duties of the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009 (“the Act”). National and local working groups provide a forum for discussion on issues in relation to implementation of the Act including monitoring progress of the actions resulting from the Strategies and Plans. Most recently the Scottish Government met with local authorities at the SCOTS Flood Risk Management Group, which included Falkirk Council, at the end of May 2021.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how much it has invested in digital infrastructure in each year since 2016.
Answer
The level of capital investment in digital infrastructure in each financial year since 2015-16 is provided in the following table:
Financial Year | Total Spend (£m) |
2015-16 | £68.9 |
2016-17 | £54.9 |
2017-18 | £66.2 |
2018-19 | £27.1 |
2019-20 | £18.0 |
2020-21 | £21.6 |
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the actions (a) noted and (b) recommended in The Promise, Scotland’s first change programme, which supports the delivery of the Promise Plan 2021-2024.
Answer
We welcome the publication of The Change Programme, which sets out what needs to happen over the next year to ensure Scotland keeps its Promise to improve the lives of children and young people in or on the edges of care.
I wrote an open letter to Fiona Duncan, Chair of The Promise Scotland, setting out the Scottish Government’s response to the publication of The Change Programme. A copy of the letter can be found here .
We recognise that there is still a lot of work to be done to ensure full implementation of The Promise by 2030 and we will continue to work with The Promise Scotland, Local Authorities, partners, families, children and young people to deliver the ambition of making Scotland the best place to grow up where every child feels loved, safe, respected and able to reach their full potential. We will #KeepThePromise.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi McAllan on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government how many flood defence schemes have been (a) commissioned and (b) completed since 2016.
Answer
Flood Risk Management Strategies were published by SEPA in 2015. These set out proposals for 42 flood protection schemes which were prioritised according to their cost benefit ratio and taking into account a series of additional criteria, encompassing the environmental and social impacts of flooding.
It is for local authorities to commission and take forward these Schemes. In July 2016, it was agreed by Scottish Ministers and COSLA that 80% of the flood component of the General Capital Grant would be distributed according to the SEPA prioritisation of flood protection schemes set out in the Flood Risk Management Strategies. 40 of the prioritised schemes were deemed to be eligible for grant funding.
Of the 42 prioritised schemes 9 are complete, 5 are under construction and the others are at various stages of development. 7 other schemes commissioned by local authorities prior to 2016 have also been completed since 2016.
- Asked by: Alexander Burnett, MSP for Aberdeenshire West, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 24 June 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 13 July 2021
To ask the Scottish Government which department holds responsibility for the definition of business classifications for the purpose of determining the receipt of COVID-related support funding; where a list of such classifications is published; for what reason the classifications are structured in the way that they are; what the purpose of such a structure is; what the impact of classification is in respect of the receipt of funding, and under what classification would kennels and catteries be found.
Answer
The financial support we have made available to businesses has, in the main, been predicated on the restrictions in place on specific businesses through legislation agreed by the Scottish Parliament rather than on sectoral classifications. Businesses were grouped by sectoral classification for the purposes of distributing the January Top up Grant and the Business Restart Grant but these grants were similarly awarded based on the impact of Regulations.
Eligibility for support can be found on the Scottish Government’s website including those businesses classified as Retail, Hospitality and Leisure businesses for the purposes of determining these top up payments. As Kennels and Catteries were not required to close or subject to any specific legislative restrictions on their operations, they were not eligible for support through the Strategic Framework Business Fund or associated schemes.
We did, however, set up the £120 million Local Authority Discretionary Fund specifically to support those businesses which were financially impacted due to COVID but did not qualify for other forms of financial support.