- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what analysis it has carried out of the current balance between the number of newly qualified teachers entering the profession and the number of permanent posts available across Scotland.
Answer
While the recruitment and deployment of teachers is the responsibility of local authorities, the Scottish government takes concerns about the recruitment and retention of teachers very seriously.
The Scottish Government conducts an annual teacher workforce planning exercise, at a national level, to forecast the need for newly registered teachers, consulting key stakeholders through the Teacher Workforce Planning Advisory Group (TWPAG). TWPAG, which includes representatives from local authorities, universities, GTCS, teacher unions, COSLA and SFC, recommends intake targets to Ministers.
This process is informed by a statistical model incorporating factors such as pupil projections, teacher turnover, post-probation employment rates, and ITE retention, supplemented by stakeholder input.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what recent assessment it has made of the accuracy of Pupil Product Ratios (PPR) used by local authorities to forecast school rolls in areas of high housing growth; what data it holds on instances where actual pupil numbers from new developments have exceeded the 0.3 (primary) and 0.13 (secondary) per household estimates, and whether it will review these formulas to ensure that they are fit for purpose, in light of the 2026 school census data.
Answer
Local authorities have the statutory responsibility to manage their school estate, and determining appropriate Pupil Product Ratios (PPR). The Scottish Government does not hold national data comparing pupil yields with PPR assumptions, however, the Determining Primary School Capacity guidance supports local authorities in using locally derived evidence within their planning models. Any review of PPRs in light of future census data remains a matter for each authority.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how many licence applications were made to NatureScot for the purposes of controlling the raven population in each year since 2021.
Answer
The following table sets out how many licence applications were made to NatureScot for the purposes of controlling ravens in each year since 2021. The information also sets out how many licences were subsequently issued, amended before being issued, refused and cancelled by the applicant.
| | Applied (Initial or Amendment) | Issued | Issued as a subsequent amendment | Refused | Cancelled | In progress |
2021 | 172 | 154 | 18 | 0 | 0 | - |
2022 | 168 | 161 | 7 | 0 | 0 | - |
2023 | 152 | 146 | 6 | 0 | 0 | - |
2024 | 147 | 127 | 16 | 4 | 0 | - |
2025 | 168 | 159 | 9 | 0 | 0 | - |
2026 (to date) | 52 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
*Please note that all 2026 figures shown are based on data available up to 18 March 2026.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, for what reason it has not yet acted on the call made by Endometriosis UK in its campaign, Menstrual Wellbeing in Scotland, which launched in 2020 and called for menstrual wellbeing education to be made a compulsory component of the curriculum in all of Scotland's schools; whether it plans for this to be formally integrated into the Relationships, Sexual Health and Parenthood (RSHP) framework and, if so, by what date it will do so.
Answer
The Scottish Government published updated statutory RSHP teaching guidance in February 2026. The revised teaching guidance reflects the issues currently facing children and young people, especially around inclusivity, consent and healthy relationships as well as online influences.
Regarding content of the Scottish curriculum, I refer the member to the answer to questions S6W-30034 on 3 October 2024, and S6W-32189 on 23 December 2024. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers.
- Asked by: Rachael Hamilton, MSP for Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether local authorities are required to undertake formal risk assessments before introducing one-to-one digital device programmes in schools.
Answer
Under the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 local authorities are responsible for the delivery of education in their area, and to ensure that school environments are safe for pupils. In that context, decisions about introducing one-to-one digital device programmes sit with local authorities as part of their wider responsibilities for the planning and delivery of education.
The Scottish Government does not mandate a specific or centrally prescribed form of risk assessment for such programmes. However, local authorities are responsible for ensuring that appropriate consideration is given to potential risks and mitigations as part of their own decision-making processes, including safeguarding, data protection, security, accessibility and pupil wellbeing.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shona Robison on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the impact of reported deteriorating pavement conditions on the number of unintentional trips and falls among people aged 65 and over, and what data it holds on the annual cost to each NHS board of treating injuries, such as hip fractures, specifically resulting from falls on poorly maintained or untreated public footways (a) in each year since 2021-22 and (b) since April 2025.
Answer
Councils have a duty under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 to manage and maintain local roads and footways in their area; and duties under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to secure expeditious, convenient and safe movement of traffic and people using their roads and footways.
Councils are entirely separate entities from the Scottish Government. Their powers are set out in statute and, it is up to each local authority to manage its own day to day business, including the maintenance of pavements. If pavements are of an unacceptable condition, complaints should be made directly to the council in question. Thereafter, if the matter remains unresolved, the complaint may be able to be referred to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman.
The Scottish Government does not hold data on the cost to each NHS board of treating injuries, such as hip fractures, resulting from falls on poorly maintained or untreated public footways. Individual health boards/ambulance services may hold this data but, likely only in relation to the types of injuries treated and not the reasons for them.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what specific metrics it is using to assess the impact of universal free school meals on closing the poverty-related attainment gap, and whether its evaluation includes data on school attendance, classroom concentration and the reduction of so-called "holiday hunger" for those families currently caught in the gap between universal and means-tested eligibility.
Answer
The impact of deprivation on attainment is well understood and addressed through the Strategic Attainment Challenge Programme. The Scottish Government implements a range of policies, including Free School Meals, to mitigate the impact of poverty on pupils, support readiness to learn and contribute to the aims of the Scottish Attainment Challenge to close the poverty-related attainment gap. Taken together, these measures form part of our wider approach to equity in education and support our ongoing work to close the poverty-related- attainment gap. A summative evaluation report on the Scottish Attainment Challenge was published on 17 March, highlighting significant system-wide progress in embedding a culture of equity in Scotland’s education system and can be accessed on gov.scot.
While the Scottish Government does not evaluate the impact of Free School Meals on attainment, it does collect annual data on the number of registrations and uptake of meals, which are published on gov.scot. This helps inform decisions on future expansion of the programme.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that planning capacity formulas for existing schools do not account for modern educational requirements, such as breakout spaces and sensory rooms, and how it ensures that Section 75 developer contributions are sufficient to cover the true cost of modern school expansions, rather than just the basic physical classroom footprint.
Answer
Local authorities are responsible for managing their school estate in line with statutory duties and ensure that capacity assessments reflect modern educational design requirements. The Determining Primary School Capacity guidance recognises evolving approaches to school design and supports authorities in assessing planning and working capacity accordingly.
It is for individual planning authorities to determine whether to seek developer contributions towards infrastructure delivery to enable development, whilst also considering the level of contributions and the potential impact on the viability of development. Developer contributions sought via Section 75 planning obligations should comply with the tests set out in National Planning Framework 4 and Circular 4/2025.
- Asked by: Jamie Greene, MSP for West Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenny Gilruth on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what the gap was between the proportion of school leavers from the most and least deprived areas entering a positive initial destination, in each of the last five years, for each local authority area.
Answer
The information requested is included in the National Improvement Framework Interactive Evidence Report (NIFIER). This can be accessed via the following link: National Improvement Framework Interactive Evidence Report
To download the data go to the Data tab. Under Select Outcome choose "NIF Key Measures" and under Select Measure choose "Percentage of secondary school leavers in a positive initial destination".
Currently there is only LA level data published for this indicator for 2023-24. There is a planned update to the NIFIER on 14 April 2026 and at this point data will be added for 2024-25 and earlier years.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 March 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Fairlie on 24 March 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, with reference to the Prior Information Notice published on 4 March 2026, whether it plans to exercise powers under Regulation 29(8) of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015 to set a time limit on the receipt of tenders for the Northern Isles Ferry Services 4 (NIFS4) contract.
Answer
Transport Scotland will set a time limit which is proportionate and appropriate for this competition. This will be applied consistently to all invited bidders and will exceed the minimum time limit of 30 days set out by Regulation 29(6).