- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 11 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-25762 by Roseanna Cunningham on 29 October 2019, what its response is to evidence from Oakdene Hollins, A review of the proposed recycling DRS in Scotland, which suggests that the UK beer market is "‘highly vulnerable" to upsizing with "90% of the market being 33cl or below"’ and "the larger 50cl having sufficient market presence to prompt the switch", and whether it considers that it contradicts the answer that it provided.
Answer
As indicated in the response to S5W-25762, the analysis in the Business Regulatory Impact Assessment suggests that the deposit will not have a significant impact on consumer choice in terms of type or size of format. The decision to pursue a scheme design which maximises consumer convenience and targets a high capture rate should help to mitigate any impact. The deposit amount does not increase the price of the product, as the deposit will be returned in full. It should also be noted that there is a wide range of business and consumer behaviours that dictate product choice.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 7 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what evidence is available to support its claim, conveyed in a letter from the Cabinet Secretary for the Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform to the Chief Executive of British Glass on 27 September 2019, regarding glass inclusion in the deposit return scheme that "Scottish businesses can benefit from this high-quality feedstock, maximising economic opportunities and supporting jobs".
Answer
The introduction of a deposit return scheme (DRS) will significantly increase the quantity and quality of glass recyclate from single-use drinks containers. While it will be for drinks producers to manage material collected through the scheme, we are committed to working with industry to maximise the economic opportunities associated with this high-quality feedstock.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 7 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the statement from British Glass in its report, DRS for Scotland and Glass, that "the inclusion of glass will increase the cost and complexity of a DRS [deposit return scheme] system and therefore increase the risk of the scheme not operating effectively from day one", and what evidence it has available to suggest that this will not be the case and the DRS will operate effectively.
Answer
The Scottish Government believes that deposit return represents the best opportunity to deliver increases in the quantity and quality of glass recyclate. We acknowledge that its inclusion will increase the cost and complexity of the scheme, but the Full Business Case Stage 1 that has been published for the scheme demonstrates that it will also deliver substantial additional benefits.
The Scottish Government continues to work closely with stakeholders on plans for implementation of the scheme, including through its Implementation Advisory Group. That work builds on extensive evidence gathered from other international schemes, a number of which successfully collect glass.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 7 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the evidence from Oakdene Hollins in its report, Recycling DRS in Scotland, that across Europe, five out of the top seven countries for glass recycling do not operate a deposit return scheme (DRS) system, and what its justification is for setting similar targets for Scotland with the intention of operating a solely DRS system.
Answer
Glass capture rates in different European countries reflect a number of policies and practices acting in combination over time, with the existence of long-standing extended producer responsibility schemes and the adoption of pay as you throw consumer charging measures often featuring.
Scotland’s DRS has been developed with Scotland’s unique policy, infrastructure and existing performance levels in mind and our intention is that it will operate alongside Scotland’s kerbside collection and bring site arrangements.
As set out in the answer to S5W-25865 on 5 November 2019, the performance target for DRS is based on experience of other high-performing DRS schemes in Europe and is therefore considered to be ambitious but achievable.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at: http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 7 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what evidence it has to support its claim conveyed in a letter from the Cabinet Secretary for the Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform to the Chief Executive of British Glass on 27 September 2019, that "if glass were to be excluded from DRS [deposit return scheme], it would have to be covered by alternative producer responsibility arrangements, the costs of which are likely to increase significantly in the period ahead".
Answer
As set out in the ‘Consultation on reforming the UK packaging producer responsibility system’ published in February 2019, the UK Government, Scottish Government, and other devolved administrations intend to establish new extended producer responsibility arrangements for all household packaging waste.
The proposals include a requirement that producers cover the full net cost (taking account of revenue from the sale of materials for recycling) of managing their packaging at end-of-life. Analysis cited in the consultation suggests that at present less than 7% of the cost of managing that waste is covered by producers.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 7 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how increased levels of the plastic, PET, will be managed as a result of any decline of one-way glass that arises as a consequence of a deposit return scheme.
Answer
There is currently limited evidence from other deposit return schemes (DRS) to suggest a widespread switch away from single-use glass to other materials.
The introduction of deposit return will significantly increase the quantity and quality of all target materials including recycled PET plastic, creating an aggregated and high-quality feedstock for reprocessing. We are committed to working with industry to maximise the economic opportunities associated with this and, in particular, are exploring the opportunities associated with the re-processing of PET plastic captured through the scheme.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 5 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of it not being included in its proposed deposit return scheme, how it will ensure that the recycling rates of high-demand flint cullet (clear glass) will not decrease.
Answer
As set out in the draft Regulations published on 10 September 2019, the deposit return scheme (DRS) will include single-use drinks containers made wholly or mainly from glass. This will include containers made from flint glass; indeed, a significant proportion of the glass collected through DRS is projected to be flint.
In order to ensure that a high recycling rate is maintained for flint glass from containers other than single-use drinks containers, we are reviewing the Scottish Household Recycling Charter Code of Practice to take account of the impact of DRS. There is a duty in the Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2012 for local authorities to provide a collection for glass: they will continue to collect glass not captured by DRS.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 5 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it will support local authorities in maintaining the current provisions for recycling glass, including kerbside collections and bottle banks.
Answer
30 out of 32 Councils have signed the Scottish Household Recycling Charter and the supporting Code of Practice. The Code of Practice is being reviewed to ensure that it aligns with our new deposit return system, and it is the intention of the Scottish Government that there will continue to be kerbside and bottle bank collection of glass alongside DRS.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 5 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it will prevent any market distortion that could arise because of glass being included in the proposed deposit return scheme.
Answer
The Government is clear that packaging design choices are a matter for producers and there are a number of factors which influence their decisions. Ministers have taken an approach which seeks to avoid the preferred scheme design favouring any particular material. We remain committed to continuing our engagement with all sectors, including the glass industry, regarding our plans for DRS.
- Asked by: Finlay Carson, MSP for Galloway and West Dumfries, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 October 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 5 November 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on evidence from the research and consulting company, Oakdene Hollins, in its report, Recycling DRS in Scotland, published in September 2019, that glass reverse vending machines are not currently economically viable for glass, and what measures it is taking to ensure that they are.
Answer
The Scottish Government’s “A Deposit Return Scheme for Scotland: Full Business Case Stage 1” details the costs associated with the operation of an ambitious scheme which includes glass. This includes the costs associated with the acquisition and operation of reverse vending machines (RVMs).
It is the intention that all costs incurred by return points be met through a handling fee paid by producers or a scheme administrator acting on their behalf. Again, this includes costs associated with the purchase, lease, maintenance or upkeep of RVMs.