- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 1 June 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what estimate it has made of the total annual harvest of mountain hares in each of the last five years.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not have access to the National Gamebag Census (NGC) dataset held by the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT). GWCT routinely publish only summary data, in the form of trend indices.
Following a request from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) in June 2017, estimates of the number of hares culled were provided by GWCT to SNH up to and including 2015 only. The NGC data for 2016 and 2017 (which are required to derive these estimates) were not available at the time.
The estimated values are:
2013: 29,634
2014: 37,681
2015: 26,952
These figures are derived using modelling and calibration of NGC game bag figures against a historic baseline, namely the figure of 24,529 for 2006-07 as published in SNH commissioned research report 278: The distribution of Mountain Hare (Lepus timidus) in Scotland (2006-07). There is no indication of effort (i.e. number of guns and days of shooting etc) and the population index values from which these estimates are derived are, themselves, subject to varying levels of statistical confidence.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 1 June 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what payments were made by Scottish Natural Heritage to the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust for (a) access to and (b) analysis of National Gamebag Census data for mountain hares in (i) 2016, (ii) 2017 and (iii) 2018.
Answer
A single payment of £358.80 was made by Scottish Natural Heritage to the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust in 2017 to analyse the National Gamebag Census dataset up to 2015, the most recent year available at the time. There was no payment for such work in 2016 and none to-date in 2018.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 1 June 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to the third supplementary to question S5F-02186 by Nicola Sturgeon on 29 March 2018 (Official Report, c. 20), what options are being explored to prevent the large-scale culling of mountain hares, and when this process will be concluded.
Answer
The independently-led group, chaired by Professor Werritty set up to examine how to ensure grouse moor management is sustainable and compliant with the law is also examining mountain hare management. The group will report back to the Cabinet Secretary for Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform in Spring 2019.
We are currently considering whether interim measures may be appropriate. Assessment of all the available data required to inform that consideration is underway.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 16 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 29 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a list of all contracts with Kier Construction Scotland that it has contributed, or is contributing, funding to.
Answer
The Scottish Government has no direct contracts in place with Kier Construction. The following table sets out the projects that the Scottish Government has contributed (or is contributing) funding towards, where Keir Construction has been the contractor. This table does not include projects procured by contracting authorities under their own programmes of work:
Contracting Authority | Project Name |
East Ayrshire Council | William McIlvanney Campus, Kilmarnock |
Falkirk Council | St Bernadette’s Primary School, Stenhousemuir |
Golden Jubilee Foundation | Golden Jubilee Hospital Extension |
Highland Council | Alness Academy, Alness |
NHS Ayrshire & Arran | The National Secure Forensic Inpatient Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service |
NHS Grampian | Backlog Maintenance Phase 1 & Ambulatory Facility |
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde | Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Royal Alexandra Hospital & Glasgow Royal Infirmary Infrastructure Upgrade Projects |
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde | Rowanbank Medium Secure Care Appurtenance |
North Ayrshire Council | Garnock Community Campus, Glengarnock |
South Ayrshire Council | Queen Margaret Academy, Ayr |
South Ayrshire Council | Ayr Academy, Ayr |
South Ayrshire Council | Marr College, Troon |
South Lanarkshire Council | Halfmerke/ West Mains Primary School, East Kilbride |
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 30 April 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Humza Yousaf on 29 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what the annual cost of maintaining the Caledonian MacBrayne fleet has been in each year since 2010.
Answer
As the vessel owners, Caledonian Maritime Assets Ltd (CMAL) undertake statutory upgrades to the CalMac fleet. Details on the levels of recent investment are detailed in the following table for years 2010 to 2018:-
Year | £m |
2010 | £0.9m |
2011 | £1.3m |
2012 | £1.2m |
2013 | £0.8m |
2014 | £1.9m |
2015 | £2.5m |
2016 | £2.0m |
2017 | £3.0m |
2018 | £3.0m (Estimate) |
For future years CMAL have an annual statutory upgrade budget of £3m. From time to time there are changes in legislation which require statutory upgrades to the vessels. In addition, there are also other upgrades that are agreed with the vessel owners which will enhance or benefit the asset.
In addition to the monies invested by CMAL, CalMac have confirmed the undernoted levels of investment in maintenance of the CalMac fleet in financial years ending between March 2010 and March 2017.
Financial year ending | Maintenance investments (excl. owner upgrades) £m |
| |
March 2010 | £9.6m |
March 2011 | £9.9m |
March 2012 | £11.0m |
March 2013 | £15.0m |
March 2014 | £18.7m |
March 2015 | £20.2m |
March 2016 | £21.0m |
March 2017 | £20.8m |
CalMac’s future programme of maintenance work is subject to change according to the vessels maintenance programme. In general terms the level of planned work will be broadly comparable to recent years. The level of work can vary due to planned variations in workscope and there will be an element of reactive maintenance work as a result of inspections and survey. During the course of day to day operations, there will also be unplanned breakdown maintenance which is included in the cost of maintenance of the fleet.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 04 May 2018
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S5W-12478, S5W-15636 and S5W-16135 by Roseanna Cunningham on 10 November 2017, 26 March 2018 and 4 May 2018 respectively, whether it has completed its discussions with animal welfare groups and local authorities regarding increasing the penalties for animal cruelty offences and other potential amendments to the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006 and, if not, by what date it expects to do so; by what date it expects the most suitable legislative vehicle to take this forward will be identified, and whether it will provide the information that was requested regarding by what date the legislation will be brought forward and, if this information is not available, whether it can confirm that it will be brought forward before the end of the parliamentary session.
Answer
The Scottish Government has regular contact with its major animal welfare stakeholders. Scottish Government officials have discussed, and corresponded on, an increase to the penalties for animal cruelty offences with a number of animal welfare organisations, including the Scottish SPCA, and a number of representatives from Scottish local authorities. Officials last met representatives of the Scottish local authorities and SPCA on 3 May 2018 to discuss this topic.
The Scottish Parliament was informed, in response to S5W-16095 on 1 May 2018, the Scottish Government will introduce the legislation when the most suitable legislative vehicle has been identified and it will come into force on approval by the Scottish Parliament.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what cause of death was determined in relation to a group of whooper swans found dead in the Fairnington area of the Scottish Borders in December 2017 and January 2018.
Answer
Five of the sixteen recovered whooper swan carcases found dead in the Fairnington area in the Scottish Borders inDecember 2017 were identified as having died from lead poisoning as a result of ingesting lead of an unknown type and that they had not been shot.
The cause of death for the remaining eleven whooper swans was not identified although, as they were found in exactly the same set of circumstances, it is highly likely they suffered the same fate. However, this could not be confirmed during post mortem due to the advanced state of decomposition in most of the carcases.
It is not possible to say where and when the swans ingested the lead. It is understood the swans migrated from Iceland to the UK for the winter and the lead could have been ingested anywhere on that journey or before, during or after. There is no evidence to suggest the swans ingested the lead over a wetland area, although this remains a possibility. There is no wildfowling undertaken at the location where they were found.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the regulation system for the use of lead ammunition in firearms is fit for purpose.
Answer
The Scottish Government is not aware of any issues that make the regulation system for the use of lead ammunition in firearms not fit for purpose.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what policy is in place regarding funding the use of lead shot in publicly-funded goose culling/management schemes.
Answer
For any goose shooting under publicly funded schemes, non-lead shot is required to be used over wetlands as set out in The Environmental Protection (Restriction of Use on Lead Shot) (Scotland) (No.2) Regulations 2004.
For the Greylag Adaptive Management Pilots in Orkney, Tiree & Coll, Lewis & Harris and Uist, only non-lead shotgun ammunition was purchased by Scottish Natural Heritage.
For the Islay Adaptive Management Scheme, where lethal control is undertaken by a combination of farmers and employed marksmen, non-lead shot is used over wetlands and additional training is provided on the use of non-lead shot.
In addition, over non wetland areas, practitioners are strongly encouraged to move to using non-lead shot through awareness raising and training.
- Asked by: Colin Smyth, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 08 May 2018
-
Current Status:
Answered by Roseanna Cunningham on 16 May 2018
To ask the Scottish Government what steps will be taken to ensure that there are no repeat episodes similar to the mass death of whooper swans in the Fairnington area of the Scottish Borders in December 2017 and January 2018.
Answer
Given that the cause of deaths of the whooper swans in the Fairnington area of the Scottish Borders in December 2017 and January 2018 were inconclusive, there is no guarantee that any steps the Scottish Government takes would prevent a repeat scenario.