- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 20 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the report, Not so simple, by the charity, Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust, what assessment it has made of variations in treatment decisions in Scotland for CIN2 cervical cell changes.
Answer
NHS standard management of CIN2 in Scotland remains treatment, except in situations where treatment is not appropriate, for example during pregnancy. There are two treatment types that currently meet the gold standard for management of CIN2. The Scottish Cervical Screening Programme continues to consider emerging evidence about more conservative management for individual cases and welcomes the Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust report.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 20 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the recommendation in the report, Not so simple, by the charity, Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust, what plans it has to review and standardise the information in Scotland about potential side effects of treatment and sources of support for women diagnosed with cell changes after cervical screening.
Answer
Information on cervical screening results and what happens after treatment is standardised in the Scottish Cervical Screening Programme. The cervical screening information needs of women are being reviewed for the implementation of HPV primary screening next year and Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust is represented on the communications group. The cervical screening programme will therefore be able to take account of the findings in the research on the impact of cell changes for women in the development of new information materials.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 19 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what measures are being taken to prevent outbreaks of oak processionary moth.
Answer
Scotland is part of the United Kingdom Oak Processionary Moth (OPM) protected zone. On the 16 July 2019, following the introduction of OPM infested trees into England, the Scottish Government further strengthened protection by introducing emergency measures which has restricted the movement of larger oak trees deemed the highest risk of OPM. Similar legislation was introduced throughout the UK.
Scottish Government officials are working with other parts of the UK to share intelligence on scale and distribution of trees imported into the UK and our inspectors are investigating all Scottish sites where suspect trees have been planted since September 2018.
As of 14 August 2019, Scotland has had 5 positive findings. The trees infested have been destroyed. Scottish Government inspectors have visited 127 sites in total to inspect for OPM.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 14 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what action it has taken to identify women who were given Essure contraceptive implants, inform them about the risks associated with its use and monitor adverse events reported.
Answer
The MHRA is responsible for monitoring adverse events associated with any medical device. Any patient who has experienced a complication from her Essure device is able to report this through the MHRA’s Yellow Card scheme .
Following withdrawal of the device from the European market, the MHRA advised that there is no evidence to suggest any increased risk to patient safety. This is clearly set out in the statement the Agency issued on 21 September 2017. Health Boards would, of course, be fully expected to take appropriate action were the MHRA to change its advice in the future, including contacting patients if necessary. Any individual patient who has concerns should not hesitate to speak to her GP.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 05 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 2 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that access to public health or social services should ever be contingent on the use of long-acting reversible contraception.
Answer
The Scottish Government is committed to providing the right support at the right time, and creating equity of access to service provision, particularly for those most vulnerable in our society. We want to engage in an open discussion to ensure that any concerns relating to particular aspects of accessing programme provision are properly considered and discussed.
Where contraception is provided, provision should be made through local sexual health services to ensure that informed consent is sought and provided.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 1 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government by what date it will publish each integration authority’s funding allocation to alcohol and drug partnerships.
Answer
The Scottish Government direct funding allocation to Integration Authority’s for Alcohol and Drug Partnerships (ADPs) is included in NHS Board allocations. Letters were issued on 12 December 2018 to advise Board allocations. The allocations for ADPs within each NHS Board are published on our webpage and is available here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/alcohol-and-drug-partnerships-funding-allocations/
2019-20 allocations through our Programme for Government, Local Improvement Fund are being finalised and we will be writing to Integration Authorities in the coming weeks.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 12 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 1 August 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the total spend on alcohol and drug partnerships by integration authorities was in 2018-19.
Answer
This information is not collated centrally. We reported to the Health and Sport Committee on Alcohol and Drug spend for 2016-17 and agreed to provide a similar update on 2018-19 spend following the end of the financial year. We will provide this information to the Committee when this becomes available.
We invested £53.8 million to NHS Boards for onward allocation to Integration Authorities to support Alcohol and Drug Partnership (ADPs) projects in 2018-19. This information is available here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/alcohol-and-drug-partnerships-funding-allocations/
Our Rights, Respect and Recovery Strategy is being supported by further investment of £20m per year for the remainder of this parliament, to help improve the quality and provision of drug and alcohol services. £17 million of this was allocated to Integration Authorities and ADPs in 2018-19, through our Local Improvement Fund to support work in improvement and innovation in the way alcohol and drug services are developed and delivered. This information is available here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/local-improvement-fund-allocations/
The total financial resource available in any given year is higher than the direct contribution provided from the Scottish Government budget and includes contributions from the NHS and other statutory partners.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 22 July 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S5W-14658 and S5W-14655 by Shona Robison on 6 and 13 March 2018 respectively, on what date the Essure contraceptive implant was approved for use in Scotland, and on what date NHS boards stopped offering this device.
Answer
The regulation of medical devices is a matter that is reserved to Westminster and, as such, medical devices are approved for use on a cross-UK basis. Essure model ESS305, the version of the device made available in the UK, received a CE mark in 2006 and was therefore available for use in the UK from that date. Four Health Boards previously offered the Essure device in Scotland and, with the exception of a small number of procedures that went ahead as outlined in answer to S5W-14658 all stopped fitting the device following withdrawal of its CE mark in August 2017.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 05 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 22 July 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-18525 by Jeane Freeman on 18 September 2018, when it will review the national Adverse Event framework to ensure that it is fit for purpose, and what progress has been made to address the concerns expressed by the Health and Sport Committee in its report, The Governance of the NHS in Scotland - ensuring delivery of the best healthcare for Scotland (SP Paper 367) in relation to areas and processes that require improvement and a recommendation “that Healthcare Improvement Scotland should be tasked with bringing forward these changes in order to improve the operation of the current system.”
Answer
As part of the response to the Health and Sport Committee Governance Report of July 2018, I asked Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) to carry out a review of its role and approach to the adverse events process.
As a first step, HIS has been working to establish a baseline to determine where there is uniformity and divergence in the way that NHS Boards approach significant adverse event reporting and to gain a greater understanding of the contributing factors to this variation. The baseline report has involved detailed engagement with individual NHS Boards and I understand that it will be published in the next few weeks.
I have been clear that health and social care providers throughout Scotland must use learning from all reporting systems to support a culture of openness and learning. I have asked HIS to look further than the existing National Adverse Events Framework, which while essential, is only part of the solution to developing a reporting and learning system which drives continuously improving services and outcomes for patients, carers and staff.
I have instructed my officials to work closely with HIS, NHS Education for Scotland and other stakeholders to ensure that now that the baseline review is concluded, actions can be identified and implemented, as quickly as possible.
- Asked by: Monica Lennon, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 01 July 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 18 July 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-22426 by Jeane Freeman on 17 April 2019, how much of the £535 million of frontline spending under the Waiting Times Improvement Plan has been allocated to each NHS board in 2019-20, and for what specialities.
Answer
The next phase of funding under the Waiting Times Improvement Plan was announced on 28 April. An additional investment of £70 million will be allocated to NHS Boards to target long waits during the financial year 2019-20.
An announcement will be made later this month which will provide detail around the allocation of funding and which specialities it covers.