- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 28 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-01651 by Graeme Dey on 18 August 2021, what provisions there are for the recovery of costs in the event of mechanical failure in the time charter agreement between CalMac and the Isle of Man Steam Packet Company for the MV Arrow.
Answer
CalMac Ferries Ltd negotiated the time charter of the MV Arrow with the Isle of Man Steam Packet Company, in line with the industry standard practice. Responsibility for crewing, repairs & maintenance and regulatory compliance rests with the Seatruck, as the owner of the vessel. CalMac Ferries Ltd did not pay a charter fee for to the Isle of Man Steam Packet Company for the MV Arrow when the vessel was not available for deployment as a result of mechanical failure.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 28 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-01651 by Graeme Dey on 18 August 2021, how many times the MV Arrow sailed under the terms of the time charter between CalMac and the Isle of Man Steam Packet Company that ended on 9 September 2021.
Answer
CalMac Ferries Ltd negotiated a time charter for the MV Arrow with the Isle of Man Steam Packet Company for the 8 weeks, commencing 24 July and terminating on 9 September 2021. Whilst operating the overnight Ullapool – Stornoway freight service, 70 sailings were undertaken by the MV Arrow. The freight carried on these sailings amounted to 1,109 commercial vehicle units.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 28 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-02135 by Graeme Dey on 6 September 2021, whether the consultants are under a contractual obligation to include trade unions organising ferry workers in Scotland in the independent review.
Answer
As previously stated the scope of the review involves analysis of the legal constraints and governance arrangements of the existing Tripartite structure of Transport Scotland, Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited and David MacBrayne Limited (including its subsidiaries). Once the final report has been considered by Ministers, there will be engagement with all key stakeholders including trade unions.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 28 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-02135 by Graeme Dey on 6 September 2021, when it anticipates it will publish the consultants' interim findings, and what the value is of its contract with (a) Ernst and Young LLP and (b) MacRoberts LLP for this work.
Answer
The full review remains on schedule to publish around the end of the year. The value of the contract was provided in the answer to Mr Leonard's previous question S6W-02579 on 13 September 2021.
All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 27 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide the minutes of any meetings that have taken place between (a) cabinet secretaries, (b) ministers and (c) representatives of Scottish Enterprise and representatives of CalaChem in Grangemouth.
Answer
As no timeline has been specified by the member, information from 22 March 2021 to 22 September 2021 is provided. During this period, no meetings have taken place between Cabinet Secretaries or Ministers with representatives of CalaChem Ltd in Grangemouth. The Scottish Government does not hold the information on Scottish Enterprise meetings with CalaChem Ltd centrally. However, I have requested that Scottish Enterprise respond to the member directly with this information.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 23 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of reports of a proposed loss of 500 jobs at McVities in Glasgow and 100 jobs at CalaChem in Grangemouth, whether it will commit to producing an Industrial Strategy for Scotland that is investment-led, jobs-first, people-centred and manufacturing-driven.
Answer
The Scottish Government was deeply concerned to learn of the ongoing risk to jobs at both McVities and CalaChem. The member will be aware of the ongoing engagement between the Scottish Government and McVities, and I have already responded to the member in relation to engagements with CalaChem.
The National Strategy for Economic Transformation will represent a coherent Green Industrial Strategy for Scotland, which, supported by the Just Transition Plans for industry, will include a vision for reinvigorating the Scottish manufacturing and industry, supporting Scottish supply chains and creating high-quality jobs.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 22 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government on which dates meetings have taken place between (a) cabinet secretaries, (b) ministers and (c) representatives of Scottish Enterprise and representatives of CalaChem in Grangemouth.
Answer
As no timeline has been specified by the member, information from 22 March 2021 to 22 September 2021 is provided. During this period, no meetings have taken place between Cabinet Secretaries or Ministers with representatives of CalaChem Ltd in Grangemouth. I last visited CalaChem as Minister for Trade, Investment and Innovation on 5 November 2019. The Scottish Government does not hold the information on Scottish Enterprise meetings with CalaChem Ltd centrally. However, I have requested that Scottish Enterprise respond to the member directly with this information.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 21 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what actions it (a) has taken to date and (b) plans to take to avoid the potential loss of 100 manufacturing jobs at CalaChem in Grangemouth.
Answer
The Scottish Government was deeply concerned to learn that CalaChem Ltd is entering into a consultation with its manufacturing services workforce in Grangemouth. Through Scottish Enterprise we have engaged with CalaChem Ltd, and will continue to work with them throughout its consultation period to explore all possible options to support the business and workforce.
In the unfortunate event that job losses should occur, the Scottish Government will provide support to all affected employees through our initiative for responding to redundancy situations, Partnership Action for Continuing Employment (PACE). We have already contacted the company and have outlined the offer of PACE support for employees in the unfortunate event this may be needed.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has regarding whether the (a) individuals and (b) organisations on the Ferry Industry Advisory Group have been consulted, as part of the current review of transport governance structures in Scotland, being carried out by Jacobs UK Limited for Transport Scotland.
Answer
Scottish Government officials engaged ferry stakeholders, including some representatives also on the Ferry Industry Advisory Group, as part of the National Transport Strategy review, which included the review of transport governance.
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-02580 on 13 September 2021 on stakeholders engaged by Jacobs as part of the review on transport governance structures in Scotland. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at https://www.parliament.scot/chamber-and-committees/written-questions-and-answers
In addition, a review of the current legal structures and governance arrangements around the provision of ferry services is underway. As part of this review, we will work with all key stakeholders to ensure the most efficient and best value arrangement to deliver our key lifeline ferry services.
- Asked by: Richard Leonard, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 September 2021
Submitting member has a registered interest.
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 13 September 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to build a case for making a direct award of the next Clyde and Hebrides ferry services contract to an in-house operator, as stated on page 28 of the Scottish Government Ferry Services Procurement Policy, Interim Report - Emerging Findings, published in December 2017.
Answer
The Scottish Ministers are committed to ensure the most efficient and best value arrangement to deliver our key lifeline ferry services. An independent review of the current legal structures and governance arrangements around the provision of ferry services is already underway. There is nothing ‘off limits’ to the appointed consultants when addressing the issues within the scope of the review, including the direct award option. The review remains on track and we hope to publish the provisional outcomes of the review around the end of the year.