Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 29 September 2024
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3667 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S5W-12049

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Monday, 16 October 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 31 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how it ensures that (a) it, (b) its officials, (c) Healthcare Improvement Scotland, (d) the Healthcare Environment Inspectorate and (e) the rest of the NHS implements its responsibilities under the (i) Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, (ii) Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 and (iii) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations with regard to (A) ensuring patient safety and (B) tackling healthcare associated infections, and what analysis it has carried out of the standards of compliance.

Question reference: S5W-11674

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 30 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how many managed-access schemes for drugs there have been in each year since 1999.

Question reference: S5W-11917

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 October 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Shona Robison on 27 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how many community maternity hubs are planned, and where they will be located; how much they will cost to develop; how they will be staffed; how the risk profile of the mothers due to give birth will be assessed, and what action it will take to ensure that the hubs (a) offer consistent high-quality care and (b) maintain safe staffing rotas.

Question reference: S5W-11519

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Monday, 25 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Aileen Campbell on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-06124 by Shona Robison on 25 January 2017, whether it will provide the uptake rates for 2016-17.

Question reference: S5W-11668

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Maureen Watt on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how many people with eating disorders have received NHS support in each year since 1999, broken down by NHS board.

Question reference: S5W-11700

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Maureen Watt on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the possibility that administering medication covertly to an individual might be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which relates to an individual's right to respect for private life.

Question reference: S5W-11701

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Maureen Watt on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government what consideration it has given to the possibility that administering medication covertly to an individual might be incompatible with Article 17 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which states that "Every person with disabilities has a right to respect for his or her physical integrity on an equal basis with others".

Question reference: S5W-11697

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Maureen Watt on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will accept the recommendation made by the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in April 2014 in its General comment and "abolish policies and legislative provisions that allow or perpetrate forced treatment...by psychiatric and other health and medical professionals".

Question reference: S5W-11663

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 29 September 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Aileen Campbell on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government how many people have not presented for cancer screening in each year since 1999, broken down by NHS board.

Question reference: S5W-11986

  • Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 12 October 2017
  • Current Status: Answered by Maureen Watt on 26 October 2017

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the requirement under the Human Rights Act 1998 that public authorities must take account of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), what action it has taken to ensure that the NHS is aware of the 2012 ECHR judgement in the case of (a) X v Finland, which found that the forced medical intervention had interfered with X's physical integrity and (b) Gorobet v Moldova, which found that forced treatment that had not been shown to be a medical necessity could amount to degrading treatment.