- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 17 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 2 March 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will consider establishing a national database of available supply teachers.
Answer
To support the availability of supply teachers for schools in Scotland the Scottish Government recently increased the Primary supply assumption in the teacher workforce planning model from 8% to 12%, while increasing overall teacher student intake targets for the sixth year in a row.
We are currently working with local authority and teacher organisation partners on the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) to develop a national supply booking system where those teachers seeking supply opportunities will be able to register their availability, making it easier for local authorities to identify and access available supply teachers. This system is currently being piloted.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 February 2017
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 22 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what it is doing to tackle livestock worrying.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 22 February 2017
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 31 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 8 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-06335 by John Swinney on 30 January 2017, whether it will provide an answer to the question that was asked on what discussions it has had with the board of the Scottish Funding Council regarding the Scottish Government's plan to abolish the board, and what response it received
Answer
There is ongoing engagement between the Scottish Government and the Scottish Funding Council around the Enterprise and Skills Review. Most recently, Ms Somerville attended the Scottish Funding Council Board meeting on 27 January and had a helpful and constructive discussion with the Board on a range of issues including Phase 2 of the Review.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 7 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will publish correspondence between ministers and the Scottish Funding Council between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016, which related to the purpose of the £50 million in additional funding that the Scottish Government clawed back in 2015-16.
Answer
The Scottish Government did not correspond on the purpose of the £50m given it had already made clear that this sum was to be recovered from the Scottish Funding Council’s budget.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 7 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what financial resources will be made available to the Commissioner for Fair Access in order to commission the research data that needs to be compiled to inform his work.
Answer
The Commissioner for Fair Access is currently considering the priorities for research on access in Scotland. Resources made available for research will be informed by Professor Scott’s assessment of the need for new work to be carried out.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 3 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason some of the additional £50 million funds allocated to the Scottish Funding Council in 2011 was not passed on to higher education institutions as originally intended.
Answer
The decision to recover the resources was taken on the basis of assurance from the Scottish Funding Council that the financial commitments made to universities and colleges had been met in full, and the resources that were available to institutions were the resources that had been confirmed to them by the SFC as part of successive budget settlements.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 26 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 3 February 2017
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) was engaged in discussions with higher education institutions about how to spend £50 million on campus development projects after the SFC had been notified in the Financial Report to its board in February 2014 that the Scottish Government would claw back this money.
Answer
Dialogue between the Scottish Funding Council and the two institutions in question was held as part of the on-going dialogue between SFC and institutions about strategic priorities. This regular dialogue about investment ambitions and requirements does not constitute a commitment to invest. Ministers were not asked to make a decision about either investment.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 30 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with the board of the Scottish Funding Council regarding the Scottish Government's plan to abolish the board, and what response it received.
Answer
The Scottish Government meets regularly with the Scottish Funding Council to discuss a range of matters, including the Enterprise and Skills Review. Most recently, Scottish Government officials attended the meeting of the SFC board on 16 December 2016.
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 26 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the Scottish Funding Council returned to it the £50 million underspend that it reported for 2015-16.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-06106 on 26 January 2017. All answers to written Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx
- Asked by: Liz Smith, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 January 2017
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 26 January 2017
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason the Scottish Funding Council reported a £50 million underspend for 2015-16.
Answer
The £50m reported by the SFC in its reserves for 2015-16 came about because the allocation of funding to the body by the Scottish Government is made on a financial year basis, whereas the body’s spending is on an academic year basis. For this reason the SFC needs the flexibility to manage its cash flow between financial years to ensure all of its academic year funding obligations are met.
Following the award of additional funding to the SFC in the 2011 Spending Review, it rolled forward larger than normal financial year reserves. Being assured that every financial commitment to every institution had been met in full it was decided by the Scottish Government that the £50 million should come back to the government’s consolidated budget and be available to be deployed against agreed priorities.
This process was concluded as part of the Scottish Government’s Consolidated Accounts for 2015-16 as lodged with the Parliament in September.