To ask the Scottish Executive what the average earnings were for (a) men and (b) women in full time employment in (i) Kilmarnock and Loudoun and (ii) Scotland on the last date for which information is available and in each of the last five years and what information it has on how this compares with figures for the United Kingdom.
The preferred source for earnings estimates is the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE), which is carried out by the Office for National Statistics.
Tables 1 and 2 below show the median gross weekly earnings for full-time employees resident in Kilmarnock and Loudoun constituency, Scotland and the United Kingdom. The latest year for which data is available is 2008.
Table 1 “ Median Gross Weekly Pay (£) for Full-Time Employee Jobs1 of Males resident in selected Areas (2004-08).
Area | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Kilmarnock and Loudoun Constituency | 460.4 | 453.1 | 467.1 | 482.3 | 526.3 |
Scotland | 427.1 | 446.5 | 463.3 | 480.9 | 505.8 |
United Kingdom | 460 | 471 | 484.3 | 498.3 | 521.2 |
Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Office for National Statistics
Notes:
1. Employees on adult rates whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence.
2. The estimates are based on a sample survey, and as such, are subject to sampling error.
3. The methodology for the survey was changed and there is a discontinuity in the series. The results for 2006 to 2008 use the same methodology, but are not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005.
Table 2 “ Median Gross Weekly Pay (£) for Full-Time Employee Jobs1 of Females resident in selected Areas (2004-08).
Area | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 |
Kilmarnock and Loudoun Constituency | 336 | 368.8 | 424.6 | 452.3 | 487.4 |
Scotland | 341 | 360.4 | 372.6 | 381 | 399.1 |
United Kingdom | 356.7 | 371.4 | 383.3 | 394.8 | 412 |
Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Office for National Statistics.
Notes:
1. Employees on adult rates whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence.
2. The estimates are based on a sample survey, and as such, are subject to sampling error.
3. The methodology for the survey was changed and there is a discontinuity in the series. The results for 2006 to 2008 use the same methodology, but are not directly comparable with 2004 and 2005.