- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 8 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to work with community groups and charities to encourage people affected by (a) forced marriage and (b) domestic abuse to seek help and advice.
Answer
The Scottish Government works collaboratively with a range of third sector and community based organisations who provide support and advice to people affected by domestic abuse and or forced marriage. Along with our partners in the Scottish Government facilitated forced marriage network, we have developed and distributed a range of printed and web based information and awareness raising materials which include information and contact details for a range of support organisations. All materials are available in English and in community languages. This ensures that those affected are aware of and understand the protection available and are able to access advice and support as required.
The Scottish Government also funds the Scottish Domestic Abuse and Forced Marriage helpline, over £350K for 2016-2017, which is available 24 hours a day to anyone affected by forced marriage or domestic abuse. In October 2016, the Scottish Government announced an extra £665K to expand advice and support services for victims of gender based violence, through the Scottish Women’s Rights Centre.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 8 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with BT regarding the removal of phone boxes in rural areas, and what assessment it has made of the safety implications for people in areas with poor mobile phone coverage.
Answer
The removal of public phone boxes is a reserved issue for which the Scottish Government has no direct role or influence, and which is governed by Ofcom's regulations on BT.
BT has indicated to the Scottish Government that it is currently consulting on the removal of 1525 boxes in Scotland but has confirmed that it won’t proceed with the proposed removal if no mobile signal can be detected near the box.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 8 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide a breakdown of how many phone boxes have been removed in rural areas where there is poor mobile phone coverage.
Answer
The removal of public phone boxes is a reserved issue for which the Scottish Government has no direct role or influence, and which is governed by Ofcom's regulations on BT. The Scottish Government is not consulted on phone box removal and does not hold any relevant data.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 28 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 8 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will ensure that every town and village has free wireless internet by 2020, as proposed by the European Commission.
Answer
The Scottish Government welcomes the European Commission's commitment to extend free access to Wi-Fi connectivity in public spaces, and the associated 120M WiFi4EU scheme. We exploring how Scotland’s potential benefits can be maximised.
The Scottish Government’s Public Wireless Programme, established in 2015, has already delivered improved Wi-Fi coverage in Scotland. The Programme provided just under £1M of grants in 2015-16 enabling local authorities to extend, or introduce, free Wi-Fi services across a range of buildings used by the public such as libraries, community centres and sports facilities. In tandem, the Programme has created best practice guidance in collaboration with public organisations to ensure wireless broadband projects are developed sustainably and genuinely match local needs.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 7 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-03141 by Fergus Ewing on 5 October 2016, whether it will publish all of its correspondence with the UK Government regarding the proposed broadband universal service obligation.
Answer
The information requested can be found in SPICe. The relevant BIB number is 58279.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 4 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what impact the reported 43.3% real-terms reduction in capital spending in the Scottish Police Authority budget has had on the infrastructure maintenance funding of the Police Scotland estate.
Answer
It is for SPA and Police Scotland to determine the best possible use of the budget according to national and local priorities. All areas of Scotland now have more consistent access to a range of national and regional resources as a result of the creation of Police Scotland.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Michael Matheson on 4 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the funding allocated to the Scottish Police Authority includes adequate infrastructure investment and maintenance for the infrastructure and maintenance needs of Police Scotland.
Answer
It is for SPA and Police Scotland to determine the best possible use of the budget according to national and local priorities. All areas of Scotland now have more consistent access to a range of national and regional resources as a result of the creation of Police Scotland.”
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mark McDonald on 3 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to the recent Joint Civil Society's criticism of the continued legality of the "justifiable assault" defence in its recent report on human rights to the UN.
Answer
The Scottish Government is opposed to the physical punishment of children. The Scottish Government does not, however, wish to see parents unnecessarily or unreasonably criminalised and we have no plans to bring forward legislation to repeal existing legal defences for parents in relation to physical punishment. There are already restrictions in this area. Section 51 of the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 makes it illegal to punish a child by way of a blow to the head, shaking or the use of an implement. In addition, section 51 of the 2003 Act lays down a range of factors for the courts to consider when determining whether other forms of physical punishment are lawful. As indicated in paragraphs 214 and 215 of the Policy Memorandum for the then Bill (http://www.parliament.scot/S1_Bills/Criminal%20Justice%20(Scotland)%20Bill/b50s1pm.pdf ), these factors were laid down by the European Court of Human Rights.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul Wheelhouse on 3 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government how the remaining £4.9 million of Scotland’s Energy Efficiency Programme budget will be spent, in light of £9.1million having been allocated on 30 September 2016, and how the money can be applied for.
Answer
The balance of funding has been reallocated within existing funding programmes in 2016-17 for both the Low Carbon Infrastructure Transition Programme (LCITP) and the Home Energy Efficiency Programmes for Scotland: Area Based Schemes (ABS). As part of a call to use unallocated ABS funds, including the balance of SEEP funding, 21 councils received additional ABS funding (see funding breakdown below). Further Information on LCITP can be found here http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Business-Industry/Energy/Action/lowcarbon/LCITP
Reallocation of unused SEEP and HEEPS: ABS funding
Council
|
Additional Funding £k
|
Purpose
|
Aberdeenshire
|
500,000
|
EWI and CWI extraction
|
Angus
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
Clackmannanshire
|
417,000
|
EWI and IWI
|
Dumfries & Galloway
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
Dundee
|
429,000
|
EWI
|
East Ayrshire
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
Falkirk
|
37,000
|
EWI
|
Glasgow
|
500,000
|
EWI and IWI
|
Highland
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
Inverclyde
|
500,000
|
EWI and Low Cost Measures
|
Midlothian
|
50,000
|
EWI
|
Moray
|
205,000
|
EWI, IWI
|
North Ayrshire
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
North Lanarkshire
|
500,000
|
EWI, Radiator Panels
|
Renfrewshire
|
762,000
|
EWI
|
Shetland
|
318,000
|
EWI
|
South Ayrshire
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
South Lanarkshire
|
740,000
|
EWI
|
Stirling
|
474,000
|
EWI
|
West Lothian
|
500,000
|
EWI
|
Western Isles
|
499,000
|
IWI, RnR
|
TOTALS
|
9,431,000 (1)
|
|
EWI (External Wall Insulation), IWI (Internal wall Insulation) RnR (Room in roof Insulation),
CWI (Cavity wall Insulation)
|
1) Total allocated funding exceeds the £4.9m remaining from SEEP as it includes additional unallocated HEEPS: Area Based Schemes funding
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney Islands, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 October 2016
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 2 November 2016
To ask the Scottish Government for what reason its recently-launched initiative to encourage primary schoolchildren to read is called the First Minister’s Reading Challenge; what other names were considered, broken down by reason for rejection, and, when selecting the name, whether it considered any similar initiatives that are named after heads of government, and, if so, (a) which and (b) what lessons it learned from these.
Answer
The current First Minister's personal love of reading and her commitment to improving literacy levels for children and young people across Scotland have been key factors in driving the development and launch of this initiative. While not the only factor that may affect success of initiatives like this, the Office of the First Minister can also bring a significance and profile that a reading challenge might otherwise not achieve - the success in the uptake of the Challenge in the short time since the launch is an indicator of this. The initiative was named the First Minister's Reading Challenge without consideration or rejection of alternatives.