- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive on what percentage of applications to Disclosure Scotland no charge was levied in each of the last six months and in each year since its establishment.
Answer
Disclosure Scotland may only issue disclosures where the appropriate fee is paid. Scottish ministers have, however, made available funding to cover the cost of disclosures applied for by volunteers working unpaid with children and vulnerable adults. The following table shows, for each period, the actual number of applications involved and the number expressed as a percentage of the total number of applications received.
Period/Month | Number of Applications Made by Volunteers | As Per Cent of All Applications |
April 2002 to Mar 2003 | 9,242 | 7% |
April 2003 to Mar 2004 | 30,119 | 8% |
January 2004 | 1,357 | 2% |
February 2004 | 2,364 | 4% |
March 2004 | 3,383 | 8% |
April 2004 | 3,026 | 9% |
May 2004 | 1,862 | 6% |
June 2004 | 2786 | 9% |
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how many applications to Disclosure Scotland were returned to the applicants due to errors in each of the last six months and in each year since its establishment, in each case expressed also as a percentage of the total number of applications in each category of disclosure.
Answer
Information relating to applications returned to applicants is only available from January 2004 and a breakdown by category of disclosure is not available. The available information is shown in the following table:
Month | Applications Returned | % Returned |
January 2004 | 1,851 | 3% |
February 2004 | 2,491 | 4% |
March 2004 | 9,116 | 20% |
April 2004 | 5,113 | 13% |
May 2004 | 3,954 | 11% |
June 2004 | 3,663 | 11% |
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how many applications there were to Disclosure Scotland for (a) basic, (b) standard and (c) enhanced disclosures in each year since its establishment and in each of the last 12 months.
Answer
The information requested is set out in the following table:
Period/Month | Number of Applications | Period/Month | Number of Applications |
Basic | Standard | Enhanced |
April 2002 to Mar 2003 | 2,191 | 20,871 | 115,558 |
April 2003 to Mar 2004 | 178,818 | 29,758 | 187,162 |
July 2003 | 9,326 | 1,961 | 12,765 |
August 2003 | 13,534 | 1,785 | 12,794 |
September 2003 | 13,368 | 2,219 | 16,688 |
October 2003 | 14,565 | 2,824 | 19,887 |
November 2003 | 16,478 | 2,815 | 22,714 |
December 2003 | 24,978 | 1,843 | 18,087 |
January 2004 | 45,558 | 896 | 8,818 |
February 2004 | 40,689 | 1,329 | 13,852 |
March 2004 | 24,449 | 2,229 | 18,493 |
April 2004 | 19,220 | 1,813 | 14,055 |
May 2004 | 14,621 | 1,639 | 15,979 |
June 2004 | 11,156 | 1,786 | 17,755 |
The figures relate to valid applications and exclude those returned to applicants as a consequence of errors identified during initial checks.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what the average turnaround times for applications to Disclosure Scotland for (a) basic, (b) standard and (c) enhanced disclosures are currently and were in each of the last 12 months.
Answer
The estimated average turnaround time for all levels of disclosures processed in the week ending 25 July 2004 was 11 calendar days.
The times for the earlier periods are set out in the following table:
Month | Times in Calendar Days |
Standard/Enhanced | Basic |
July 2003 | 9 | 10 |
August 2003 | 12 | 12 |
September 2003 | 9 | 12 |
October 2003 | 15 | 13 |
November 2003 | 16 | 13 |
December 2003 | 17 | 15 |
January 2004 | 17 | 20 |
February 2004 | 23 | 24 |
March 2004 | 30 | 23 |
April 2004 | 13 | 17 |
May 2004 | 17 | 17 |
June 2004 | 13 | 13 |
In all cases, the turnaround times given apply to applications which did not require the correction of errors in the application form, clearance of payment arrangements or enquiries to police forces for any relevant non‑conviction information. Applications requiring correction, etc took longer to process.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how many staff are employed by Disclosure Scotland and how many were employed in each year since its establishment.
Answer
The number of staff (full time equivalents) employed at Disclosure Scotland, including staff employed directly by BT, at April each year since 2002 and at mid-uly 2004, was as follows:
April 2002, 47.5 (including 22 by BT).
April 2003, 85.5 (including 38 by BT).
April 2004, 193.5 (including 85 by BT).
July 2004, 249 (including 96 by BT).
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 10 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of applications to Disclosure Scotland has fallen outwith the turnaround times stipulated by each service agreement for (a) basic, (b) standard and (c) enhanced disclosures in each year since its establishment and in each of the last six months.
Answer
The service level agreement (SLA)for standard and enhanced applications is to deal with 90% in 14 calendar days and for basic applications it is to deal with 90% in six calendar weeks. The SLA relates to applications which do not require the correction of errors in the application form, clearance of payment arrangements or enquiries to police forces for any relevant non-conviction information.
The table shows the percentage of applications which were completed within and outside the SLA.
Period/Month | Standard/Enhanced | Basic |
Within | Outside | Within | Outside |
April 2002 to Mar 2003 | 92% | 8% | 99% | 1% |
April 2003 to Mar 2004 | 75% | 25% | 98% | 2% |
January 2004 | 30% | 70% | 93% | 7% |
February 2004 | 16% | 84% | 97% | 3% |
March 2004 | 29% | 71% | 95% | 5% |
April 2004 | 72% | 28% | 99% | 1% |
May 2004 | 47% | 53% | 97% | 3% |
June 2004 | 36% | 64% | 100% | 0% |
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress has been made by the European Commission in completing the review of access rules referred to in Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 and what the latest anticipated timescale is for the completion of this review.
Answer
The Commission has sought and secured a delay in the production of a report into the effectiveness of access restrictions, which was originally intended to be made available by 31 December 2003. During 2003 and 2004, the Commission secured agreement on the scope of the review, established a scientific expert group to agree its terms of reference and established scientific expert sub-groups to conduct reviews and draft reports for evaluation of each access rule. The Commission’s scientific expert groups first met in April 2004 and the sub-groups are now preparing their reports. No revised timescale for the Article 19 review has been agreed, but the Commission’s final report and corresponding proposalsare expected before the end of 2004.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any submissions or representations to the European Commission in relation to the review of access rules referred to in Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Answer
The Scottish Executive have made no direct submissions or representations to the European Commission in relation to the review of access rules referred to in Article 19. The UK Government have, after oral and written representations from the Scottish Executive, submitted written comments on the scope of the Article 19 review, made necessary analytical data available to the Commission and offered active co-operation in the establishment and membership of necessary scientific expert working groups.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, in relation to the review of access rules referred to in Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, it will seek to justify the continued existence of the Shetland Box in terms of conservation and sustainable exploitation objectives.
Answer
Yes, the Scottish Executive agrees that the Shetland Box access conditions should be strengthened and updated but considers the Shetland Box arrangement to be a vital protection for an important ecosystem – and also believes its continuation is also justified in other terms.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 July 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any submissions or representations to Her Majesty's Government in relation to the review of access rules referred to in Article 19 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Answer
In the course of routine business the Scottish Executive has made numerous written and oral representations to Department for Environment Food andRural Affairs (DEFRA) on several aspects of the Article 19 review, concentrating on the implications of the review for the Shetland Box access arrangements. Representations from Scottish Executive have included views on the proper scope and timetabling of the review, the membership and terms of reference for the Commission’s scientific expert groups, and the UK strategy for anticipating and handling proposals arising from the Commission’s report, including effective stakeholder engagement and consultation.
The Scottish Executive provided DEFRA with detailed submissions on the effectiveness of the Shetland Box during the negotiations leading to the reformed framework regulation of the Common Fisheries Policy. No further submissions have been provided.