- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 20 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what volume of white fish has been landed in each month of this year and what the total landed figures were for each of the last three years, broken down by species in each case.
Answer
The information requested on the volume of whitefish landed in each month of this year (all vessels) for the main whitefish species - i.e. yearly landings of 20 tonnes or more - is provided in the table attached. The equivalent total landed figures for each of the last three years is available from Table 15 (UK vessels) and Table 24 (Foreign vessels) of the publication
Scottish Sea Fisheries Statistics 1999 which is available in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
2000 Monthly landings of main whitefish species |
Species | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sept | Grand Total |
Blue Ling | 289 | 339 | 1,239 | 1,792 | 918 | 350 | 332 | 232 | 202 | 5,758 |
Bluemouth | 14 | 20 | 15 | 34 | 36 | 23 | 25 | 21 | 11 | 204 |
Catfish | 9 | 17 | 24 | 57 | 152 | 159 | 116 | 95 | 55 | 699 |
Cod | 1,439 | 1,651 | 1,634 | 1,536 | 3,136 | 2,812 | 2,413 | 2,615 | 1,758 | 19,741 |
Conger Eels | 10 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 71 |
Dabs | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 34 |
Dogfish | 188 | 271 | 377 | 328 | 407 | 252 | 254 | 250 | 181 | 2,832 |
Forkbeard | 74 | 57 | 95 | 83 | 61 | 39 | 48 | 52 | 38 | 563 |
Greenland Halibut | 23 | 195 | 137 | 75 | 158 | 188 | 91 | 45 | 44 | 1,008 |
Haddock | 3,600 | 4,343 | 4,609 | 2,976 | 3,074 | 4,350 | 5,122 | 5,355 | 4,010 | 39,031 |
Hake | 174 | 105 | 140 | 212 | 656 | 1025 | 500 | 228 | 146 | 3,251 |
Halibut | 35 | 3 | 21 | 10 | 33 | 27 | 35 | 25 | 8 | 201 |
Lemon Sole | 37 | 42 | 83 | 175 | 308 | 440 | 257 | 297 | 187 | 1,891 |
Ling | 521 | 624 | 846 | 809 | 901 | 777 | 642 | 527 | 445 | 6,248 |
Megrims | 227 | 180 | 382 | 316 | 357 | 367 | 285 | 324 | 175 | 2,696 |
Monks | 1,091 | 978 | 1,106 | 1,097 | 1,160 | 951 | 884 | 953 | 706 | 9,246 |
Plaice | 100 | 89 | 100 | 120 | 323 | 391 | 203 | 188 | 191 | 1778 |
Pollack (Lythe) | 46 | 90 | 63 | 66 | 105 | 87 | 125 | 93 | 50 | 745 |
Redfish | 141 | 39 | 167 | 226 | 137 | 103 | 170 | 125 | 90 | 1,211 |
Roes | 32 | 61 | 27 | 26 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 155 |
Roundnose Grenadier | 417 | 234 | 224 | 530 | 1074 | 838 | 824 | 841 | 1161 | 6,496 |
Saithe (Coalfish) | 437 | 1,106 | 791 | 872 | 1,222 | 1,153 | 1,403 | 1,314 | 1,171 | 9,789 |
Sandeels | 0 | 0 | 687 | 1,436 | 2,354 | 3,908 | 709 | 541 | 0 | 9,635 |
Scabbardfish - black | 165 | 184 | 163 | 177 | 166 | 191 | 114 | 127 | 151 | 1,479 |
Sharks | 12 | 26 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 87 |
Turbot | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 90 |
Tusk | 107 | 94 | 97 | 140 | 175 | 153 | 126 | 89 | 77 | 1,083 |
Whiting | 1,750 | 2,131 | 2,197 | 1,503 | 1,540 | 1,174 | 1,119 | 1,366 | 1,451 | 14,873 |
Witches | 149 | 122 | 210 | 196 | 264 | 286 | 189 | 185 | 106 | 1,767 |
Other flatfish | 11 | 13 | 17 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 14 | 126 |
Other or mixed Demersal | 55 | 38 | 51 | 54 | 61 | 57 | 49 | 52 | 46 | 482 |
Grand Total | 11,161 | 13,072 | 15,527 | 14,898 | 18,824 | 20,152 | 16,073 | 15,976 | 12,499 | 14,3271 |
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Sunday, 12 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 20 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps are being taken to increase the availability of physiotherapy and speech and language therapy services for children in north east Scotland.
Answer
I look to NHSboards in the north east to determine the need for local therapy services and toprovide the services required. We are supporting that at a national levelthrough a range of initiatives and investment stemming from the Future Directionsstrategy for developing allied health professions services.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 15 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of the Scottish fishing fleet's allocated quota for each species is expected to be caught this year.
Answer
The "Scottish fishing fleet" is not allocated fish quotas. Quotas are allocated to three fishing groups in the UK - producer organisations (20); the non-sector and the 10 metre and under fleet. There are around 70 UK quota stocks which are allocated to fishing groups. Uptake of UK quotas is routinely monitored at group rather than at individual vessel level.
Under the devolution settlement, a "Scottish boat" is defined by reference to its port of registration. It is possible for Scottish-registered vessels to be fishing out of English ports and vice versa. Similarly, some of the seven Scottish-based Producer Organisations may have in their membership vessels which are not registered in Scotland.
However, for the purposes of this answer, we have assumed the "Scottish fishing fleet" to mean the seven Scottish-based fish producer organisations. For west coast nephrops, however, the Scottish fleet also includes those vessels of under 10 metres in length and those in the non-sector (over 10 metre vessels not in membership of a fish producer organisation) since both groups have a significant interest in this fishery.
It is not possible at this stage to accurately predict the likely level of percentage uptake of quotas by the Scottish fleet since a number of factors such as availability of fish and weather conditions can bear on uptake levels in the weeks to end-December.
However, based on recorded uptake as at 9 November (the latest available figures), the following tables show the approximate percentage uptake of the main whitefish stocks by the Scottish Produce organisations based on current allocations:
North Sea | Cod | Haddock | Whiting | Saithe | Nephrops |
| 75% | 66% | 79% | 89% | 68% |
West Coast | Cod | Haddock | Whiting | Saithe | Nephrops |
| 69% | 55% | 75% | 52% | 80% |
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 15 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive why the circumstances surrounding the remit of the Deputy Minister for Rural Affairs as referred to in Mr John Home Robertson's speech in the Parliament on 1 November 2000 were not made public at the time.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-10847.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 15 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-6754 by Ross Finnie on 7 August 2000, and in the light of its Comprehensive Spending Review, whether it will provide updated information for the same figures for the next three years.
Answer
The information requested, in respect of Rural Development portfolio spending by the Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department (SERAD) is shown in the table below.
| 2001-02 | 2002-03 | 2003-04 |
Value of spending (£ million). | 148 | 158 | 162 |
Spending as a percentage of total SERAD Rural Development resource plans. | 24% | 25% | 26% |
The sums above constitute between 0.7% and 0.8% of the Executive's plans for Total Managed Expenditure. The values of the proportions shown for the expenditure here are highly sensitive to the value of "European" spending. The value of the department's significant expenditure on Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) on-farm payment schemes is very sensitive to factors such as the value of Sterling. While the Executive's plans for "non EU" spending shown above are fixed for the Spending Review 2000 period, its plans for CAP spending are classed as Annually Managed Expenditure (AME), outside the Scottish Block and formula arrangements. The spending is classed as AME because actual expenditure on CAP schemes is prone to considerable variance from plans. The proportions shown here therefore, based on comparisons between fixed and variable plans, do not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 15 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what input and influence the National Farmers' Union had in relation to the remit of the former Deputy Minister for Rural Affairs.
Answer
The selection of those proposed for appointment as junior Scottish Ministers last year was a personal decision of the late First Minister and current Executive Ministers are not in a position to comment on it.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 15 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of the overall spending block (a) its total rural affairs budget; (b) that part of the rural affairs budget which is not tied to European funding; (c) its total fisheries budget, and (d) that part of the fisheries budget which is not tied to European funding will represent in each of the next three financial years.
Answer
In the table below "overall spending block" figures are the Scottish Executive's Total Managed Expenditure as shown in Table 2 of
Making a Difference for Scotland. Figures for the "rural affairs budget" are the plans for Rural Affairs spending by the Scottish Executive Rural Affairs Department (SERAD) shown in the table on page 22 of the same document.
| 2001-02 £ million | 2002-03 £ million | 2003-04 £ million |
Scottish Executive Total Managed Expenditure (TME). | 19,743.9 | 20,912.8 | 22,074.8 |
SERAD Rural Affairs budget.(% of TME) | 621.9 (3.1%) | 627.1 (3%) | 628.5 (2.8%) |
Amounts of SERAD budget "not tied to European funding." (% of TME) | 148 (0.75%) | 158 (0.75% | 162 (0.73%) |
Fisheries Budget. (% of TME) | 6.9 (0.03%) | 8.4 (0.04%) | 8.4 (0.04%) |
Non EU Fisheries Budget. (% of TME) | 2 (0.01%) | 3 (0.01%) | 3 (0.01%) |
The Fisheries expenditure plans shown are those for the Fisheries Budget Level 2 in the table on page 22 of Making a Difference for Scotland. They exclude resources of over £50 million a year devoted to the Scottish Fisheries Protection and Fisheries Research Services Agencies which are included in the Level 2 Budgets for Agencies.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 31 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 14 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Deputy Minister for Rural Development intends to use the title of Fisheries Minister.
Answer
I will use this designation in appropriate circumstances.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 30 October 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 13 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive who will represent Scotland at the next meeting of the European Community Fisheries Council.
Answer
I will attend the next meeting of the Fisheries Council, which will take place on 17 November in Brussels.
- Asked by: Richard Lochhead, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 November 2000
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sam Galbraith on 9 November 2000
To ask the Scottish Executive when a scheme will be introduced to help low income families pay their water charges.
Answer
Water charges are currently linked to council tax bands; this provides significant protection for a large number of low-income households. Despite this, the Executive recognises that recent increases in charges may have presented some households with difficulties, accordingly we are looking at ways of improving on this existing protection.