- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has considered (a) any evidence that the new generation of low frequency acoustic startle devices disturb and elicit the so-called startle reflex in (i) bottlenose dolphins and (ii) any cetacean, and (b) any evidence that the hearing thresholds of cetaceans and pinnipeds overlap.
Answer
There is currently only one acoustic startle device on the market. There is no empirical evidence on whether the acoustic startle device disturbs free ranging bottlenose dolphins or other cetaceans, although during field studies, harbour porpoise did not appear to avoid the device. The device operates at frequencies centred around 1 kHz and is designed to target seal hearing sensitivities. In a recent study using similar sounds, captive bottlenose dolphins were observed to be startled at this frequency, at sound source levels lower than the typical operating level of the device.
There is some overlap in the frequencies to which different marine mammal species are sensitive. Porpoises and dolphins have higher frequency hearing than seals, but overlap with seals at the lower end of their hearing range. Baleen whales (for example, minke whales) have lower frequency hearing than seals, but overlap with them at the upper end of their hearing range.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status to allow for situations where acoustic deterrent devices within a narrow channel may restrict migration and access to feeding and nursery grounds of a much greater area than that ensonified by the acoustic deterrent devices.
Answer
Under Article 17 of the European Union (EU) Habitats Directive, the UK was required to assess and report on the conservation status of species listed in Annexes I, II, IV and V. The most recent report was submitted in 2019 and the UK assessments can be found on the Joint Nature Conservation Committee website. The assessments set out the criteria and data taken into account in determining whether or not a species is considered to be in Favourable Conservation Status. See https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/article-17-habitats-directive-report-2019/ for details
Regulation 3ZA of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994 places a duty on Scottish Ministers to continue publishing assessments of conservation status every six years. There are no current plans to change the assessment methodology used.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government (a) for what reasons it has not published the European Protected Species (EPS) licence applications for fish farm acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) submitted by the 15 January 2021 deadline for public scrutiny, but has published EPS licence applications for ADDs used for other purposes, (b) whether it will publish the EPS licence applications for fish farm ADDs, (c) how much time after publishing the EPS licence applications it will allow for public and scientific scrutiny, and (d) whether it still intends to complete the licencing process by 1 March 2021.
Answer
There are currently no applications for European Protected Species licences for the use of Acoustic Deterrent Devices at fish farms resulting from the review instigated last year by Marine Scotland. Marine Scotland will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted, based on the merits of each case.
In the spirit of openness and transparency, all EPS licences and applications will be placed in the public domain after a determination has been made.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status, in light of any evidence that almost all farms which use acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs), use multiple ADDS and that the time for hearing injury to occur at a certain distance decreases pro rata with the number of ADDs used.
Answer
Under Article 17 of the European Union (EU) Habitats Directive, the UK was required to assess and report on the conservation status of species listed in Annexes I, II, IV and V. The most recent report was submitted in 2019 and the UK assessments can be found on the Joint Nature Conservation Committee website. The assessments set out the criteria and data taken into account in determining whether or not a species is considered to be in Favourable Conservation Status. See https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/article-17-habitats-directive-report-2019/ for details
Regulation 3ZA of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994 places a duty on Scottish Ministers to continue publishing assessments of conservation status every six years. There are no current plans to change the assessment methodology used.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the salmon aquaculture sector in Scotland for the period October 2018 to September 2019 for (a) Cooke Aquaculture and (b) the Scottish Salmon Company in regard to how many farms (i) used acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs), (ii) did not use ADDs and (A) used either double skinned anti-predator nets or single nets of stronger, more rigid materials such as Seal Pro nets and (B) used traditional single nets.
Answer
The following table provides a breakdown of the number of sites using and not using ADDs and those using anti-predator nets, for the period October 2018 to September 2019, for Cooke Aquaculture and the Scottish Salmon Company.
Company name | Number of sites using ADDs | No of sites where ADDs are not used | Number of sites using anti-predator nets or Seal Pro nets (or equivalent) |
Scottish Salmon Company | 45 | 0 | 6 |
Cooke Aquaculture | 0 | 35 | 35 |
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status, in light of any evidence that porpoises are not evenly distributed and that the habitats predicted to be of most importance to porpoises are also the areas where acoustic deterrent devices are used.
Answer
Under Article 17 of the European Union (EU) Habitats Directive, the UK was required to assess and report on the conservation status of species listed in Annexes I, II, IV and V. The most recent report was submitted in 2019 and the UK assessments can be found on the Joint Nature Conservation Committee website. The assessments set out the criteria and data taken into account in determining whether or not a species is considered to be in Favourable Conservation Status. See https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/article-17-habitats-directive-report-2019/ for details
Regulation 3ZA of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994 places a duty on Scottish Ministers to continue publishing assessments of conservation status every six years. There are no current plans to change the assessment methodology used.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 18 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul Wheelhouse on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that the completion of the review of the ScotWind Leasing process by Crown Estate Scotland will conclude ahead of the pre-2021 election period.
Answer
The review is targeted to be completed by 24 March 2021, ahead of the pre-election period. We and Crown Estate Scotland are prioritising our resources in working to meet this target and to provide the Scottish offshore wind sector with clarity on the way forward.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-30448 by Mairi Gougeon on 15 July 2020, whether Cooke Aquaculture Scotland salmon farms use stronger, more rigid nets to enclose its stock than the Scottish Salmon Company farms and, if such nets are in use, what its position is on whether there are "satisfactory alternatives" to the use of acoustic deterrent devices.
Answer
Aquaculture companies use a range of non-lethal management measures to protect their stock including robust netting material and anti-predator nets. Information detailing the relative use of anti-predator or Seal-Pro nets by Cooke Aquaculture Scotland and the Scottish Salmon Company is provided in answer to S5W-35394 on 10 March 2021. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
A European Protected Species licence can only be granted provided that it meets three tests, including that there must be no satisfactory alternative. We will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted on the merits of each individual case and taking account of all relevant factors. It would be inappropriate to pre-determine any part of this process.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether increased cost or inconvenience could be considered a valid reason to claim that an alternative to the use of acoustic deterrent devises is not a "satisfactory alternative"; whether the separation distance between the nets on a double skinned anti-predator net can be increased where there are concerns about seals stressing farmed fish, and whether nets are available in mesh size and type which pose no more risk to mammals and birds than traditional nets.
Answer
Marine Scotland has published an information note and FAQs for operators of fish farms on the use of acoustic deterrent devices and the requirement for an EPS licence. This makes clear that reasons such as an increase in cost or inconvenience are not satisfactory reasons for why an alternative measure s has not been considered.
As well as causing direct injury and mortality to farmed fish and damage to cages and nets, the presence of seals close to the cages may cause stress and distress to the fish which may be a welfare concern for fish farm operators. Technical questions regarding net separation and mesh size would need to be assessed on a case by case basis in relation to EPS license applications.
A partnership project between Marine Scotland and Crown Estate Scotland has investigated non-lethal measures to address the problem of seal predation at fish farms, including new netting materials and anti-predator nets. The report considers options available, those requiring further development, and their potential for impacts on non-target species. The report will be published before the end of March 2021.
- Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021
To ask the Scottish Government, in recognition of public concerns including the 30,000 signature petition against the use of
acoustic deterrent devices, the lack of opportunity for public scrutiny of
European Protected Species (EPS) licence applications and Marine Scotland’s
scientific methodology, whether it believes that any farm could pass all three
EPS licencing tests and whether it will agree to conduct an open and
transparent consultation, overseen by a stakeholder committee including
scientific, conservation and tourism interests before any EPS licences are
granted.
Answer
We will give due consideration to any European Protected Species licence applications that are submitted on the merits of each individual case and taking account of all relevant factors. It would be inappropriate to pre-determine any part of this process.
There is no statutory requirement to undertake a public consultation process for individual EPS licence applications. However, in the spirit of openness and transparency, all EPS licences and applications will be placed in the public domain after a determination has been made alongside the reasons for our decisions.