Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 24 December 2024
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 1616 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S5W-35385

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government whether it has considered (a) any evidence that the new generation of low frequency acoustic startle devices disturb and elicit the so-called startle reflex in (i) bottlenose dolphins and (ii) any cetacean, and (b) any evidence that the hearing thresholds of cetaceans and pinnipeds overlap.

Question reference: S5W-35387

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status to allow for situations where acoustic deterrent devices within a narrow channel may restrict migration and access to feeding and nursery grounds of a much greater area than that ensonified by the acoustic deterrent devices.

Question reference: S5W-35390

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government (a) for what reasons it has not published the European Protected Species (EPS) licence applications for fish farm acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) submitted by the 15 January 2021 deadline for public scrutiny, but has published EPS licence applications for ADDs used for other purposes, (b) whether it will publish the EPS licence applications for fish farm ADDs, (c) how much time after publishing the EPS licence applications it will allow for public and scientific scrutiny, and (d) whether it still intends to complete the licencing process by 1 March 2021. 

Question reference: S5W-35386

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status, in light of any evidence that almost all farms which use acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs), use multiple ADDS and that the time for hearing injury to occur at a certain distance decreases pro rata with the number of ADDs used.

Question reference: S5W-35394

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government what information it has on the salmon aquaculture sector in Scotland for the period October 2018 to September 2019 for (a) Cooke Aquaculture and (b) the Scottish Salmon Company in regard to how many farms (i) used acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs), (ii) did not use ADDs and (A) used either double skinned anti-predator nets or single nets of stronger, more rigid materials such as Seal Pro nets and (B) used traditional single nets.

Question reference: S5W-35389

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 25 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will revise its model for determining whether cetaceans can be restored to, or maintained at, Favourable Conservation Status, in light of any evidence that porpoises are not evenly distributed and that the habitats predicted to be of most importance to porpoises are also the areas where acoustic deterrent devices are used.

Question reference: S5W-35305

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 18 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Paul Wheelhouse on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to ensure that the completion of the review of the ScotWind Leasing process by Crown Estate Scotland will conclude ahead of the pre-2021 election period.

Question reference: S5W-35384

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-30448 by Mairi Gougeon on 15 July 2020, whether Cooke Aquaculture Scotland salmon farms use stronger, more rigid nets to enclose its stock than the Scottish Salmon Company farms and, if such nets are in use, what its position is on whether there are "satisfactory alternatives" to the use of acoustic deterrent devices.

Question reference: S5W-35392

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether increased cost or inconvenience could be considered a valid reason to claim that an alternative to the use of acoustic deterrent devises is not a "satisfactory alternative"; whether the separation distance between the nets on a double skinned anti-predator net can be increased where there are concerns about seals stressing farmed fish, and whether nets are available in mesh size and type which pose no more risk to mammals and birds than traditional nets.

Question reference: S5W-35391

  • Asked by: Mark Ruskell, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Green Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 26 February 2021
  • Current Status: Answered by Ben Macpherson on 10 March 2021

To ask the Scottish Government, in recognition of public concerns including the 30,000 signature petition against the use of acoustic deterrent devices, the lack of opportunity for public scrutiny of European Protected Species (EPS) licence applications and Marine Scotland’s scientific methodology, whether it believes that any farm could pass all three EPS licencing tests and whether it will agree to conduct an open and transparent consultation, overseen by a stakeholder committee including scientific, conservation and tourism interests before any EPS licences are granted.