- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 10 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what contingency plans there are in respect of poultry with no access to enclosed areas in the event of an avian flu outbreak in the United Kingdom.
Answer
Planning the response to a legalrequirement for birds to be housed is a matter for individual poultry-keepers. Insupport of this the Executive has published guidance on the issues which individualpoultry-keepers will wish to take into account. A wide range of bird keepers havebeen reminded of this information in recent biosecurity guidance distributed bythe Executive.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Scottish Criminal Records Office (SCRO) executive committee meetings were attended by any civil servant from the Executive’s Justice Department; if so, what role the civil servant performed by so attending; what practice existed on reporting information regarding the discussion at the meetings of the executive committee to the Minister for Justice, and whether there was a practice of redacting any part of the minutes of the SCRO executive committee.
Answer
The Head of Police Division2 attended meetings of the Scottish Criminal Record Office Executive Committee.His role was to keep informed about the committee’s oversight of SCRO and torepresent the Executive’s interests in any relevant matters discussed by thecommittee. Whether to report any of the proceedings to ministers was a matterfor the judgment of the civil servant concerned. There was no practice ofredacting the minutes of the committee.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 10 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21547 by Mr Tom McCabe on 19 December 2005, whether applicants for the vacancies were required to have any specific professional qualifications and/or experience and, if so, what professional qualifications and/or experience were required in respect of each vacancy.
Answer
As noted in my answer to questionS2W-21547, there were 15 vacancies in the Scottish Executive, excluding the CroftersCommission, in Inverness in 2003-04 and 2004-05. Of those, nine vacancies werefor posts in Band A and, therefore, no professional qualifications or experiencewere required. The six vacancies in Bands B and C in that period were professionalposts and required qualifications, knowledge and experience specific to the posts.For example, four of the posts were in the Deer Commission for Scotland so requiredspecific knowledge and experience of the deer industry and deer management. Theother two posts required a professional qualification in agriculture and knowledgeand experience of agriculture at the appropriate level.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 10 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21547 by Mr Tom McCabe on 19 December 2005, in which of its departments the vacancies in Inverness arose in (a) 2003-04 and (b) 2004-05.
Answer
The information is as follows:
in 2003-04, five of the vacancieswere in the Deer Commission for Scotland and the remaining four vacancies were in the Animal HealthOffice in Inverness,
in 2004-05, three of the vacancieswere in the Agricultural area office in Inverness and three vacancies were in the Animal Health Officein Inverness.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 13 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 10 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21547 by Mr Tom McCabe on 19 December 2005, whether the information provided applied to the periods from (a) 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 and (b) 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 and, if not, to what dates the information applied.
Answer
Yes.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hugh Henry on 7 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive when the terms of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 will be brought into force; why it has not yet been brought into force; whether it is intended to bring it into force on 28 April 2006 and, if so, what the reasons are for the decision in respect of which date it comes into force.
Answer
The Family Law (Scotland) Act2006 will come into effect in the late spring or early summer of 2006 once therequisite arrangements have been made in relation to rules of court andsecondary legislation.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 7 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive when phase one of the upgrade and refurbishment of Waverley Station will be completed; whether this will increase the capacity of the station from 24 to 28 trains per hour, and, if so, when the station will be operating at this new increased capacity.
Answer
The target date forcompletion of the re-development of Waverley Station is November 2007. Thiswill increase the number of trains which Waverley can accommodate from 24 per hour to 28.
The station will have thecapacity for four more train paths. Operationally, this will facilitate futureplanned rail projects such as the new Airdrie to Bathgate services.
Transport Scotland hasthe operational responsibility for this area, and can be contacted for moreinformation if required.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 7 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what its estimate is of the total cost of the Waverley phase one works to increase the capacity of Waverley Station, broken down into the main components of the work, including the work on the Waverley Steps, and also allowing for any optimism bias.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is fullyfunding the redevelopment of Waverley Station at an estimated cost of £150 million,broken down into the following components:
Item | Total Cost |
Signalling and Telecoms | £34 million |
Infrastructure | £32 million |
Waverley Steps | £8 million |
Network Rail | £13 million |
Contingency and Optimism Bias | £63 million |
Total | £150 million |
Source of data: Network Rail.
Transport Scotland hasthe operational responsibility for this area, and can be contacted for more informationif required.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 7 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will continue with current funding arrangements for mountain rescue from 1 April 2006; they plan any reduction in funding, and whether it will make a ministerial statement on the matter.
Answer
Since 2003-04, the Executivehas provided £1.46 million in funding to support mountain rescue. A further grantof £300,000 will be paid to the Mountain Rescue Committee for Scotland in 2006-07.Future funding beyond that period will be considered in the context of the nextspending review.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 3 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, in respect of its consultation on the proposed Aquaculture and Fisheries Bill, what liability the proposed regulator would have in the event of salmon dying as a result of the treatment carried out by, or on the instruction of, the regulator.
Answer
The issue of where the liability lies for stock lost as a result of treatment carried out by, or on the instruction of, a regulator is one that has been raised during the consultation. The Executive will give this issue due consideration alongside other points raised by respondents during the consultation.