- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 21 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive when the report by James Mackay, in relation to the Shirley McKie and Marion Ross fingerprints was concluded; to whom it was communicated; whether it was passed to any civil servant of the Executive’s Justice Department; whether its contents were the subject of any report to the Justice Department, and whether its contents, or the conclusions of the report, or any of these, were reported by any civil servant to the Minister for Justice and, if so, whether it will provide copies of any such document in which the Minister for Justice was so advised.
Answer
The Mackay and Robertsonreport was a confidential report relating to a criminal investigation,completed on 20 October 2000. The report was submitted in full to the RegionalProcurator Fiscal at Paisley, the President of ACPOS and the Deputy ChiefConstable of Strathclyde Police.
The Scottish Executive wasadvised of the Lord Advocate’s decision (that there should be no criminalproceedings against employees of SCRO), which was made after consideration of the Mackay and Robertson report and a report by the Regional Procurator Fiscalat Paisley following his consideration of the Mackay and Robertson report.
Neither the Mackay andRobertson report nor the Regional Procurator Fiscal’s report was made availableto the Justice Department or to Justice Ministers.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has received the document referred to in the article on pages 38 and 39 of the Sunday Herald of 19 February 2006 as the “report by three experts at the UK’s national forensic training centre in Durham” in relation to the Shirley McKie and David Asbury fingerprints; if so, on what date and, if not, whether it has received advice as to its contents and, if so, on what date.
Answer
A report prepared by the NationalTraining Centre for Scientific Support to Crime Investigation was completed in June2001 and thereafter passed to the Crown Office. No Scottish minister outwith CrownOffice has seen this report. The previous Justice Minister was informed on 3 August 2000 that theeight chief constables had concluded, on the basis of investigations up to thatpoint, that four fingerprint officers at SCRO were to be suspended and of the reasonfor this. These investigations became part of a criminal investigation on whichno further information was made available to the Justice Ministers.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 17 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what advice it has received from the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) regarding the scheme of charges to be payable to SEPA in respect of energy schemes; whether it will publish that advice and what the reasons are for its position on the matter; whether it has been advised by SEPA that the initial scale of charges suggested by SEPA would make smaller-scale schemes, such as that proposed for the River Gynack, Kingussie, a hydro scheme, non-viable because of costs payable to SEPA; whether will meet any MSP who has a constituency interest in this matter before making any decision, and when a decision is expected or planned to be made.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is currentlyconsidering the Scottish Environment Protection Agency’s (SEPA) response to itsconsultation on the Water Environment charging scheme. The consultation resultedin a significant number of responses, including one from Kingussie Development Company,which detailed the impact of SEPA’s proposal on their industry. Due to the complexityof the scheme, it has taken longer than anticipated to consider a number of amendmentsproposed by SEPA, including one that acknowledges the importance of small scalehydropower in the development of renewable sources of energy. As I expect a formalannouncement to be made very shortly, I do not consider a meeting at this stageto be appropriate.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 16 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Fisheries Research Services (FRS) will be responsible for delivering the services of the regulator for the aquaculture sector and, if so, what the extra costs to FRS will be of so doing.
Answer
I refer the member to theanswers to questions S2W-23422 on the role of the regulator and S2W-23420 on thecosts of regulation on 3 March 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 16 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will, prior to introducing any legislation which provides that there will be a regulator for the salmon farming sector, meet MSPs with a constituency interest in order to discuss the impact which the measure may have upon the industry and, in particular, on employment in the most rural peripheral and island communities.
Answer
I or my officials would be happyto meet MSPs with a constituency interest to discuss the contents of the Aquacultureand Fisheries Bill once it has been introduced to Parliament in the summer.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 16 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what its estimate is of the cost of the proposed regulator for the aquaculture sector.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-23420 on 3 March 2006. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 16 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will postpone the introduction of any legislative measure which provides for a regulator for the salmon farming industry in order to allow a reasonable period in which to assess the effect and effectiveness of the code of practice, which has been published and which the industry will introduce on a voluntary basis.
Answer
There are no plans to postponethe introduction of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Bill.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 March 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 16 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what previous experience Fisheries Research Services (FRS) has in relation to salmon farming and what expertise there is within FRS regarding the sector.
Answer
Fisheries Research Services’(FRS) previous experience in salmon farming principally resides with staff of theFish Health Inspectorate who visit salmon farms on a regular basis in the courseof implementing the statutory fish health regime. Extensive experience has beenacquired in the field and laboratory since the early days of the industry in Scotland.
Salmon farming expertise at FRScovers a wide range of disciplines including fish cultivation, fish biology, fishpathology, veterinary epidemiology and environmental management.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 13 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive on what date or dates the Scottish Executive’s Cabinet has discussed the Shirley McKie case.
Answer
Information relating to the proceedingsof the Scottish Cabinet is considered exempt from disclosure under sections 29 (a)and (b) and 30(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 February 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 13 March 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive on what date or dates the Scottish Executive’s Cabinet has discussed the Scottish Criminal Record Office; in particular whether a complaint made in August 2001, referred to in a Sunday Times article on 26 February 2006, was raised expressly or by reference with the Cabinet or in any papers submitted to members of the Cabinet.
Answer
Information relating to the proceedingsof the Scottish Cabinet is considered exempt from disclosure under sections 29 (a)and (b) and 30(a) and (b) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.