- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 29 October 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 7 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with The Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers in relation to ensuring that those wishing to pursue the Post Graduate Certificate of Education (PGCE Primary) and who are leaving other careers in industry or the public sector are not deterred from doing so by virtue of the initial entitlement to pay.
Answer
The Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) is not a free-standing organisation, but is a forum through which the Scottish Executive, COSLA and the teacher organisations can reach collaborative decisions. There have been significant improvements in pay, conditions and opportunities for teachers arising from the Agreement on a Teaching Profession for the 21st Century.Negotiations on a range of issues relating to pay and conditions are continuing through the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT). Proposals from the SNCT Working Group on Conditions of Service relating to probationers will be considered at the next meeting of the SNCT on 31 January.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 August 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 3 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, in terms of the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information, public interest in the issues relating to the Scottish Transport Group Pension Schemes and the winding up thereof outweighs any harm involved in disclosure of information and, if so, whether it will make public (a) all correspondence, records of verbal communication and other documents and communications between (i) the Executive and the trustees or their agents of the relevant pension schemes, (ii) the Executive and the Scotland Office and (iii) the Executive and Her Majesty's Government and (b) all advice which it has received in connection with the Scottish Transport Group Pension Schemes, the winding up thereof and the disposal of and entitlement to surplus funds therefrom.
Answer
No. It would not be appropriate for the Executive to disclose information which would harm the frankness and candour of discussion and advice, including between the Scottish Executive and UK Government and between the Executive and the Scottish Transport Group and the Trustees of the Scottish Transport Group pensions schemes.The Scottish Executive recognises the level of public interest regarding this matter. In this respect the Scottish Executive is therefore maintaining a website (www.scotland.gov.uk/transport/stgpf) with information on the matter of the ex-gratia payments and will update this when there are substantial developments to report. In addition, once the criteria for distributing ex-gratia payments have been finalised, details will be published in national newspapers.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 November 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 3 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether those provisions of its contract with BEAR Scotland Ltd which govern the position in the event of the company's failure to perform its obligations have been made public and are available in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre and what the reasons are for its position on this matter.
Answer
I refer the member to the answers given to questions S1W-18588 and S1W-18616 on the 11 October 2001 by the former Minister for Transport and Planning. As much of the contract as may be considered not to contain sensitive commercial information has been placed in the Parliament's Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 27 December 2001
To ask the Presiding Officer, further to his answer to question S1W-20306 on 7 December 2001, whether any amounts from the five payments that were made to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd were in respect of work carried out by sub-contractors of Flour City and what the nature of any such work was.
Answer
The payments made by the Scottish Parliament to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd related to work performed in compliance with the contract between those two parties. The Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group has confirmed that the Parliament is not responsible for, and therefore holds no details of, payments made by Flour City to its sub-contractors.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 27 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to his answers to questions S1W-20206 and S1W-20210 on 6 December 2001, which of the sub-contractors of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd (a) received payment of their accounts in full, (b) received part-payment of their accounts and (c) received no payment of their accounts, and whether those who did not receive full payment of their accounts from the official receiver of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd will receive payment from the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body.
Answer
The position of sub-contractors to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd is a matter for the appointed receiver, D J Manning, Bo'ness, West Lothian.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 27 December 2001
To ask the Presiding Officer which business address in the United Kingdom Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd used in their dealings in connection with the MSP building cladding contract and whether they used, indicated that they used or possessed any business address in Edinburgh.
Answer
The initial business address provided for Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd was "29th Floor, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London EH14 5DY". The Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group has further confirmed that the company informed the Scottish Parliament on 9 May 2001, that its address had changed to "34 Queen Anne Street, London W1M 9LB". No indication of any business address in Edinburgh was given by Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd, other than in connection with the site accommodation at Holyrood.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 21 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the setting of a non-domestic rate of 47.8% for 2002-03 will place Scottish businesses at any competitive disadvantage to businesses in England and Wales and how the Scottish rate compares with the rates proposed for (a) England and (b) Wales in 2002-03.
Answer
No. We propose to increase the Scottish poundage rate by 1.7% to 47.8p for 2002-03 in line with the retail price index. The poundage rate in England and Wales will also increase by the same amount to 43.7p and 43.3p respectively.Rates bills are a product of poundage rate and rateable values. Rateable values have been increasing faster in England than in Scotland. Small businesses in Scotland also benefit from a 2p discount which is not available in England or Wales.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 21 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has discretion under the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information to place in the Scottish Parliament Information Centre any correspondence passing between it and the trustees of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has discretion under the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information not to release information which would harm the frankness and candour of discussion and advice or where any information was given in confidence.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 21 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish any correspondence between it and the trustees of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes and, if it will not, under which provision of the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information a decision not to publish any such correspondence would be based.
Answer
No. It would not be appropriate for the Scottish Executive to disclose information which would harm the frankness and candour of discussion and advice given in confidence including between the Executive and the Scottish Transport Group and the Trustees of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes. The provisions of Part II of the Code of Practice on Access are relevant.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 07 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 21 December 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will have any further discussions with Her Majesty's Government regarding amounts to be distributed to members of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes or their dependants and any amounts from those schemes to be paid to Her Majesty's Government and/or the Inland Revenue.
Answer
As I announced in the Parliament on 29 November, Scottish ministers have secured for distribution, to former members of the Scottish Transport Group pension schemes, an additional £18 million by agreement with Treasury Ministers. This means that up to £118 million will now be distributed to beneficiaries. I have no plans to discuss this further with Treasury Ministers.
