- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 15 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether parent seagulls that make swooping attacks on people in order to protect their young constitute a danger to human safety; whether it will give advice to local authorities that action should be taken under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 in order to reduce and seek to eliminate any such danger, and, in the light of the death of Mr Wilfred Roby reported in The Times on 6 July 2002, whether it will now take action in relation to any potential risk to human life.
Answer
The Scottish Executive, Scottish Natural Heritage and other agencies already offer advice to local authorities on a variety of control measures which can be taken against seagulls, including measures under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.In a situation where it is considered that attacks from seagulls pose a threat to human life, it is the responsibility of individual local authorities to decide upon the most appropriate course of action. Adequate powers to take the necessary steps are already available to local authorities as part of their environmental health responsibilities and this may include lethal control of seagulls.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 15 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the annual budget will be for the first three years of operation of (a) the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park and (b) the Cairngorms National Park.
Answer
The funding allocation for the Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park for the period 2002-03 is £4.8 million. The level of funding to be allocated in future years for National Parks in Scotland will be determined by the Executive as part of its future budgets review. The period covered in the forthcoming review runs from 2003-04 until 2005-06.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its position is on (a) the policy of modulation under the common agricultural policy and (b) the proposal by Fran' Fischler of the EU Commission that there should be a further modulation of 20% and (c) what it considers should be the maximum percentage modulated each year.
Answer
The Executive agreed to introduce modulation up to a maximum of 4.5% on the basis of matched funding from HM Treasury which aids rural development measures and, in turn, helps secure a sustainable future for Scottish agriculture. However, it is too soon to comment on the recent commission proposals to introduce compulsory modulation at a set rate across the EU. It is only one of a wide range of common agricultural policy changes being proposed, and much of the detail is still unclear but the industry steering group that I recently announced will have the opportunity to discuss issues arising from the proposals.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its policy is in relation to the maximum payment of subsidies under the common agricultural policy; whether such payment should be restricted to 300,000 euros and, if not, what that sum should be.
Answer
We welcome the general direction of the Commission's proposals for reform of the CAP, which is consistent with the Forward Strategy for Scottish Agriculture.However, any proposal to limit the maximum amount payable to individual farm businesses may act as a constraint on the future development of those businesses which have grown through being efficient and competitive. It is our policy to encourage farmers to be more efficient, not to penalise them for it.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 14 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there should be a minimum sum payable under the common agricultural policy by way of subsidies to any one farm unit and, if so, what that amount should be.
Answer
We are currently evaluating the Commission's proposals for reform of the CAP, but I am not aware of any suggestion that there should be an automatic minimum payment available to individual farm businesses.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 16 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elaine Murray on 13 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has made any estimate of the increase in visitors' spending which may result should the Inverness Highland bid to become the European Capital of Culture in 2008 be successful.
Answer
The assessment of economic implications associated with the bid by Inverness Highland to become European Capital of Culture 2008 was obtained by the team developing the bid, and is reproduced in their application document. It estimates that, should the bid be successful, this may result in additional visitor spend for 2008 of over £230 million (at 2000 prices).
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 16 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 13 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether a new Children's Science Centre should be established within the Highlands and, if so, what work requires to be done in order to investigate the feasibility of such an initiative; whether there will be a feasibility plan and, if so, whether the Highland Council will be responsible for arranging the plan, and what the cost would be and whether the Scottish Executive would fund the cost.
Answer
Questions relating to any proposed new science centre would be an issue for those making the proposal. The Executive has no plans to provide funding for any new science centres.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 12 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many farmers have received an estimated total subsidy payment for food produce in excess of ?300,000 at current exchange rates in each of the last 10 years.
Answer
Available and comparable data indicate that the total number of farm businesses receiving over €300,000 in direct CAP subsidies for commodity food production in each year was as follows:
| Year | Number of Farms |
| | |
| 1995 32 | 32 |
| 1996 32 | 32 |
| 1997 42 | 42 |
| 1998 59 | 59 |
| 1999 33 | 33 |
| 2000 34 | 34 |
| 2001 49 | 49 |
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 12 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what its policy is on the circumstances under which primary schools should lose a teacher following a decrease in the school roll; whether such reductions in teacher complement should not take effect over a period of one year but over a longer period, and what guidance it will give to local authorities on this matter.
Answer
The responsibility for the management of publicly funded schools, including the recruitment and deployment of teachers rests with individual local authorities. Within that responsibility it is a matter for local authorities to determine the most appropriate rate of change in staffing levels when a school roll declines. The Scottish Executive does not intend to issue guidance on this matter.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 July 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 12 August 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any disclosures made by Mr Peter McMahon to media in respect of the former First Minister constitute breaches of confidentiality; if so, which specific disclosures so constitute breaches of confidentiality; what the reasons are for not taking action against any such breaches; whether, had any such breaches been made by a former civil servant rather than by a former special adviser, it would have treated them differently, and, in particular, whether action would have been taken in such a case.
Answer
The articles written by Peter McMahon commenting on events when he was a special adviser did not contain anything which involved a significant breach of his duties in respect of confidential government information. On that basis legal action could not be justified. Civil servants, including special advisers, are bound by a duty of confidentiality and legal action would be considered against any existing or former civil servant, including special advisers, where there was a significant breach of that duty.
