- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 5 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there will be a power of remit between the Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill.
Answer
It is our intention that the jurisdiction of the Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill will be entirely distinct. They will not overlap. We have tabled an amendment to the bill which would give the tribunal jurisdiction over valuation appeals in relation to the right to buy. The Land Court will have a general jurisdiction over disputes arising out of agricultural tenancies under the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 1991 and the bill, but will not have jurisdiction over valuation appeals.We recognise that there may be cases concerned with valuation appeals that raise issues that fall within the jurisdiction of the Land Court. Therefore, in order to facilitate the efficient disposal of such cases, I can confirm that we have also lodged an amendment to the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Bill that would enable the tribunal to refer a matter to the Land Court if it considers that to be appropriate.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 5 February 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-33364 by Ross Finnie on 29 January 2003, whether other MSPs for the area were given notice of these meetings and offered an opportunity to attend.
Answer
No. The Executive will advise MSPs when a minister intends visiting their area. However, MSPs are not routinely advised or invited when a minister meets other MSPs in private to discuss a subject affecting their area. The arrangements for meetings organised by non-Executive bodies are for them to decide.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 5 February 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer when the management team of the Holyrood project, or any of its members, first (a) became aware of the contents of the accounts of Flour City International Inc in respect of the quarter ending 31 July 2001 and (b) communicated to (i) the Holyrood Progress Group and (ii) the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body any information in respect of the contents of those accounts.
Answer
The Holyrood Project Team was never made aware of the accounts of Flour City International for the quarter ending 31 July 2001, and consequently no information about these has been communicated to either the Holyrood Progress Group or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 27 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 4 February 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer whether the windows installed in the MSP block west elevation of the new Parliament building at Holyrood are watertight.
Answer
Yes.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 29 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish the full text of the letter to it from the European Union (EU) regarding EU structural funds for the Highlands and Islands that the Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Services referred to in The Herald on 3 December 2002.
Answer
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures were provisional, and have since been withdrawn by ONS. The letter from the Commission confirmed my view that retrospective consideration of eligibility is not possible, and followed a telephone call I received from Commissioner Barnier's Deputy Head of Cabinet. Both the call and the e-mail attaching the letter expressed regret and apologised for the earlier misunderstandings caused by the Commission.I have arranged for a copy of the Commission's letter to be sent to you. Copies have been placed in the Parliament's Reference Centre (Bib. number 25841).
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 29 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive what measures it is taking to address the declining population and, in particular, whether any consideration has been given to introducing measures that would encourage people that have left Scotland to return.
Answer
The projected modest decline in Scotland's population is attributable to the declining birth rate rather than net out-migration. Measures that ease the financial and practical difficulties faced by parents will help to address the declining birth rate. These include the UK Government's Child and Working Families tax credit policies and the Executive's Childcare Strategy and investments in the provision of pre-school care and education for three- and four-year-olds.As well as seeking to address this major demographic concern, the Executive recognises the need to retain and attract people, including those who have previously left Scotland, with the skills necessary to enable the Scottish economy to grow and compete internationally. The Executive, working with the Enterprise networks and Scottish Development International, has a number of initiatives to link Scottish businesses with successful Scots now living overseas and to attract those with appropriate skills to live and work in Scotland.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 29 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W32091 by Ross Finnie on 7 January 2003, whether any representatives of the fishing industry were present at any of the meetings specified and, if so, which representatives were present and at which meetings.
Answer
No industry representatives were present at the meetings on 26 November and 12 December. Industry representatives were present at the meetings on 11 November, 14 November and 2 December. However, these meetings were organised by the North East of Scotland Fisheries Development Partnership, Euan Robson MSP and Tavish Scott MSP respectively. Accordingly, detailed information on who attended is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 18 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 16 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer what the total cost has been of fees (a) paid and (b) payable to Shepherd and Wedderburn WS for legal advice provided in connection with Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd, Flour City International Inc. and the Holyrood project.
Answer
Further to my answer to S1W-30169 on 10 October 2002, the expected costs (invoice awaited) for the additional work by Shepherd and Wedderburn, solicitors, in advising on claims against both Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd and Flour City International Inc are £13,680 plus VAT and outlays for US agents of £1,370.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 23 December 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 16 January 2003
To ask the Presiding Officer, further to his answer to question S1W-32000 on 10 December 2002, what the names were of those present at the meeting on 4 September 2001 with Bovis Lend Lease (Scotland) Ltd and representatives of Flour City International Inc. and Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd, whether there were any other meetings with these bodies other than that which took place on 4 September 2001 and, if so, on what date or dates such meetings took place and who attended.
Answer
Those attending the meeting on 4 September 2001 were present in their capacity as representatives of their respective organisations, not as individuals in their own right. Any agreed actions or decisions are made on behalf of the organisations they represent and it would be inappropriate to identify individuals. I understand from the Convener of the Holyrood Progress Group that no other meetings took place involving members from the Holyrood Project Team.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 08 January 2003
-
Current Status:
Answered by Mary Mulligan on 16 January 2003
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it supports the medication of the water supply with fluoride.
Answer
Water fluoridation is one of the options on which views are sought in our current consultation paper Towards Better Oral Health in Children, and, as stated previously, the Executive is neutral on this particular issue.But this consultation is not simply a debate on fluoride. By any measure, oral health in Scotland compares poorly with other countries, and we need to build a consensus about how best to tackle this problem. Negative responses, simply rejecting one option or another, do not help build that consensus. As such, I would encourage individuals and organisations wishing to contribute substantively to the consultation to identify also the actions they favour.