- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 7 September 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what the administration costs have been in each social inclusion partnership in each of the last five years.
Answer
I have asked Angiolina Foster, Chief Executive of Communities Scotland to respond. Her response is as follows:
The amounts claimed for administration costs in each of the last five years are shown in the following table:
SIP | 2000-01 (£) | 2001-02 (£) | 2002-03 (£) | 2003-04 (£) | 2004-05 (£) |
Aberdeen Great Northern | 20,000 | 21,250 | 21,781 | 22,326 | 22,328 |
Argyll and Bute | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Edinburgh North | 51,575 | 57,662 | 54,127 | 53,442 | 63,280 |
Edinburgh South | 17,889 | 26,118 | 36,535 | 45,292 | 50,165 |
Edinburgh Strategic Programme | 12,450 | 12,756 | 9,072 | 9,607 | 10,098 |
Edinburgh Youth | 13,512 | 13,956 | 13,887 | 14,463 | 15,090 |
Edinburgh Craigmillar | 40,185 | 44,457 | 44,565 | 44,260 | 47,904 |
Alloa South and East | 7,616 | 23,407 | 25,950 | 0 | 0 |
Dundee Young Carers | 2,500 | 2,600 | 2,732 | 4,300 | 4,300 |
Dundee SIP 1 | 50,100 | 52,250 | 57,644 | 59,642 | 62,065 |
Dundee SIP 2 | 10,950 | 10,446 | 10,678 | 8,754 | 8,754 |
Dundee Xplore | 10,250 | 14,806 | 13,905 | 12,780 | 12,780 |
East Ayrshire Coalfields | 0 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 | 30,000 |
Tranent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Levern Valley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Falkirk | 1,171 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fife | 819 | 0 | 8,263 | 0 | 0 |
Frae Fife | 4,119 | 0 | 1,733 | 3,376 | 0 |
Glasgow Smaller Areas | 17,972 | 32,292 | 48,037 | 58,501 | 58,501 |
Glasgow Anti Racist Alliance | 19,513 | 14,499 | 21,383 | 21,880 | 21,880 |
Glasgow Big Step | 12,825 | 11,183 | 13,334 | 14,073 | 14,073 |
Glasgow Drumchapel | 47,747 | 49,154 | 71,063 | 73,555 | 73,555 |
Glasgow East End | 54,650 | 53,661 | 77,921 | 83,314 | 85,306 |
Glasgow Gorbals | 14,425 | 14,941 | 20,461 | 24,023 | 24,023 |
Glasgow Greater Easterhouse | 78,525 | 64,550 | 94,073 | 99,732 | 101,724 |
Glasgow Greater Govan | 9,011 | 17,315 | 33,812 | 45,401 | 45,401 |
Glasgow Greater Pollok | 31,103 | 55,089 | 83,171 | 95,755 | 70,755 |
Glasgow Milton | 14,100 | 18,262 | 21,497 | 24,026 | 24,026 |
Glasgow North | 65,805 | 55,992 | 83,740 | 86,845 | 88,837 |
Glasgow Routes Out | 7,828 | 6,629 | 8,408 | 8,581 | 8,581 |
Glasgow Springburn | 17,422 | 16,152 | 24,200 | 25,258 | 25,258 |
Highlands and Islands | 8,891 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Inverclyde | 48,900 | 48,330 | 49,540 | 50,780 | 0 |
Moray Youthstart | 8,021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
North Ayrshire | 797 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Motherwell North | 36,176 | 39,246 | 37,408 | 43,222 | 35,053 |
North Lanarkshire | 17,469 | 21,140 | 12,656 | 13,352 | 10,000 |
South Coatbridge | 13,637 | 18,235 | 19,455 | 18,892 | 16,275 |
GO-Perth | 0 | 0 | 5,279 | 5,411 | 0 |
Ferguslie Park | 20,365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Paisley 1 | 70,798 | 86,725 | 74,487 | 75,036 | 83,349 |
Scottish Borders | 599 | 3,992 | 2,983 | 2,500 | 5,116 |
Girvan | 5,370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11,496 |
North Ayr | 31,711 | 38,925 | 0 | 0 | 42,511 |
Blantyre/North Hamilton | 0 | 1,440 | 0 | 1,273 | 1,576 |
Cambuslang | 0 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Stirling | 11,074 | 11,815 | 10,830 | 6,707 | 6,488 |
West Dunbartonshire | 38,220 | 50,634 | 50,110 | 55,890 | 61,397 |
West Lothian | 6,400 | 3,010 | 0 | 0 | 4,294 |
Total | 952,490 | 1,045,911 | 1,194,720 | 1,242,249 | 1,246,239 |
Note: 1. From 1 April 2001 includes Ferguslie Park.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 17 August 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 29 August 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what progress Scottish Water has made in building a new treatment works to reduce the risk of water contamination in parts of Glasgow.
Answer
As these are operational matters for Scottish Water, this is a matter for the Chief Executive and I have asked him to write to you on this.
In the meantime, you may be interested to know that Scottish Water is currently undertaking the construction of the Katrine Water Project, with an estimated value of around £120 million, to improve the drinking water of 700,000 customers in the Glasgow area. For more information and an update of progress please refer to Scottish Water’s website for this project: www.katrinewaterproject.com.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 June 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 23 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-7760 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 May 2004, whether it will give full details of the notice received on 29 January 2004 under paragraph 6.8 of Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock, including (a) the effective date of the notice, (b) the risk insured, (c) the extent of the insurance, (d) the insured sum, (e) the premium, (f) any excess requested by the previous insurer for a replacement policy, (g) details of any proposal the contractor made in the notice to mitigate, manage and control such risks and (h) details of any financial resources available to the contractor to meet any claim made against it in respect of such risks.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
The information requested concerns the commercial interests of a third-party, and is therefore exempt from disclosure within the Code of Practice on Access to Scottish Executive Information.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 June 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 21 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-7760 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 May 2004, whether it will give details of any waiver by it of the contractor's obligation to secure insurance under Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
No waiver has been given.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 June 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 21 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-7760 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 May 2004, whether it has at any time on or after 29 January 2004 provided any insurance in respect of HM Prison Kilmarnock; whether it currently provides any insurance in respect of the prison, and, if so, whether it will give details of any such insurance.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) to respond. His response is as follows:
The SPS has not provided and does not provide any such insurance. Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited are responsible for placing insurance cover and have done so in each year of the contract to date.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 June 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 21 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-7760 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 May 2004, what conclusion has been reached in respect of the notice received on 29 January 2004 under paragraph 6.8 of Minute of Agreement between the Secretary of State for Scotland and Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited for the Design, Construction, Management and Financing of a Prison at Kilmarnock.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
No action was necessary as Kilmarnock Prison Services Limited subsequently advised that they had obtained and placed insurance cover.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 May 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 16 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what crime each prisoner released in error by Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd had been charged with at the time they were so released.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
This information is not available. Personal information about named prisoners is covered by the terms of the Data Protection Act.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 May 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 16 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how many Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd staff were escorting each prisoner at the time each prisoner was released in error since the commencement of the contract with Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd for the provision of prisoner escort and court custody services.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
The number and deployment of staff is an operational matter for Reliance. Each release in error is the subject of a thorough investigation conducted by the contract monitor.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 May 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 11 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the protocols followed by Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd for escorting prisoners differ from those used by Scottish Prison Service staff prior to the commencement of the contract with Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd for the provision of prisoner escort and court custody services and, if so, in what way.
Answer
I have asked Tony CameronChief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is asfollows:
Yes. There are manydifferences which together provide a more secure system. The new method movesprisoners one at a time rather than in groups, the vehicles are cellular ratherthan open plan, the vehicles are tracked electronically and a comprehensivecomputer data based management information system has been introduced.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 May 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 11 June 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive how long it took for each prisoner released in error by Reliance Secure Task Management Ltd to be returned to police custody.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
Of those released in error, only two were unlawfully at large. The two prisoners were released in error on 8 April 2004. One wasreturned to police custody on 9 April and the other returned to HM Young OffendersInstitute Polmont on 26 April.