- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what recommendations for reform of civil judicial statistics have emerged following the review of civil judicial statistics and when these will be implemented.
Answer
The Scottish Governmentis reviewing the scope, quality and presentation of statistics on the civil justicesystem, and will make and implement recommendations for change to ensure that accurate,relevant and timely statistics are collected in a consistent way across Scotland, are published in an appropriate format and are usedwith confidence.
As part of this review,research has recently been carried out with users of civil judicial statistics,to identify their data requirements and suggestions for a revised Civil JudicialStatistics publication. The report setting out the findings from this researchwas published on 5 October in Research with Users of Civil Judicial Statistics,and can be found at:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/10/04094856/0.In addition to this,it is believed that some of the data contained within the Civil Judicial Statisticspublication contain significant inaccuracies and as a result the publication hasbeen suspended whilst these inaccuracies are investigated. The latest availablepublication contains data for 2002.
The Scottish Court Service, the main provider of the data concerned, isworking with Justice Analytical Services to improve the accuracy and level of detailof the civil judicial statistics it collects. This work includes changes to theconfiguration and use of electronic systems for case management and data capturethroughout the civil courts, which will be in place by April 2008.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many applications for extensions of time to pay debts were made in the sheriff courts in each year since 2002, broken down by type of order.
Answer
The information requestedfor 2002 is given in table 5.1 of
Civil Judicial Statistics 2002, which canbe found at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/02/18897/33079.The number of applicationsfor extension of time to pay debts made, by type of order, in the sheriff courts,2003 to 2006, is provided in the following table.
Nature of application | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Time to pay order (non summary cause) | 160 | 113 | 194 | 165 |
Time to pay order (summary cause) | 174 | 151 | 270 | 148 |
Notes:
1. The data are managementinformation statistics which have not been subjected to the same quality assurancestandards as statistics produced by the Government Statistical Service. In addition,there are general concerns surrounding the accuracy of some of the civil judicialstatistics collected by the Scottish Government. Therefore, the data should be usedwith caution and it should be appreciated that firm conclusions cannot be drawnfrom the data provided.
2. Action is beingtaken to improve the accuracy and reliability of the civil judicial statistics collectedby the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many diligences were executed, including summary warrant, in each year since 2002.
Answer
The information requestedfor 2002 is given in tables 5.4 and 5.5 of
Civil Judicial Statistics 2002,which can be found at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/02/18897/33079.Information on diligencesexecuted, including summary warrant procedures, 2003 to 2006, is provided in thefollowing table. Implementation of the Debt Arrangement and Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002 resulted in changes being made to the datacollected on diligence from 2003 onwards.
Diligence Executed1 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Summary Warrant |
Council Tax | | | | |
Attachments executed | 1,191 | 1,401 | 1,113 | 1,658 |
Reports of attachments2,3 | - | 1,836 | 1,425 | 1,344 |
Auction completed following attachment3 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Exceptional attachments (EA) executed | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
Auction completed following EA3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Earnings arrestments executed | 104,270 | 110,760 | 116,449 | 123,601 |
Non-earnings arrestments executed | 130,436 | 155,481 | 162,762 | 226,037 |
Community Charge | | | | |
Attachments executed | 67 | 14 | 1 | 0 |
Reports of attachments2,3 | - | 14 | 3 | 0 |
Auction completed following attachment3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exceptional attachments (EA) executed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Auction completed following EA3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Earnings arrestments executed | 4,180 | 2,617 | 952 | 1,686 |
Non-earnings arrestments executed | 7,758 | 4,301 | 3,958 | 2,777 |
Other Summary Warrant | | | | |
Attachments executed | 2,037 | 2,044 | 1,221 | 1,964 |
Reports of attachments2,3 | - | 1,521 | 991 | 1,001 |
Auction completed following attachment3 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 5 |
Exceptional attachments (EA) executed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auction completed following EA3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Earnings arrestments executed | 2,084 | 838 | 570 | 455 |
Non-earnings arrestments executed | 12,327 | 9,369 | 8,787 | 11,679 |
Non-Summary Warrant |
Attachments executed | 2,741 | 3,345 | 4,234 | 4,547 |
Reports of attachments2,3,4 | - | 2,913 | 2,037 | 3,350 |
Auction completed following attachment3 | 170 | 178 | 204 | 187 |
Exceptional attachments (EA) executed | 0 | 63 | 27 | 46 |
Auction completed following EA3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Earnings arrestments executed | 10,627 | 11,057 | 11,295 | 9,289 |
Current maintenance arrestments executed | 5,978 | 8,037 | 11,117 | 6,035 |
Non-earnings arrestments (excluding admiralty) | | | | |
Executed on the dependence | 572 | 492 | 732 | 507 |
Executed in execution | 4,429 | 4,725 | 4,247 | 5,153 |
Admiralty arrestments | | | | |
Executed on the dependence | 12 | 3 | 7 | 12 |
Executed in execution | 42 | 2 | 3 | 244 |
Inhibitions | | | | |
Executed on the dependence | 1,358 | 1,804 | 2,103 | 2,106 |
Executed in execution | 2,232 | 2,829 | 3,318 | 5,700 |
Other | | | | |
Sequestrations for rent executed | 9 | 9 | 5 | 2 |
Decrees for maills and duties executed | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Notes:
1. This is not anexhaustive list of all diligences available, it includes only those for which the Scottish Government collects data.
2. Information isnot available for 2003.
3. Reports of attachmentsand auctions completed following attachment have been included here for completeness.
4. Information isnot available for quarters 3 and 4 of 2005.
5. The data have beenprovided by sheriff officers and Messengers-at-Arms and have not been subjectedto the same quality assurance standards as statistics produced by the GovernmentStatistical Service. The data are incomplete as not all data returns are completedand returned to the Scottish Government. In addition, there are general concernssurrounding the accuracy of some of the civil judicial statistics collected by the Scottish Government. Therefore, the data should be used with caution and it shouldbe appreciated that firm conclusions cannot be drawn from the data provided.
6. Action is beingtaken to improve the accuracy and reliability of the civil judicial statistics collectedby the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what measures it is taking to improve the accuracy of civil judicial statistics and when these will be implemented.
Answer
I refer the memberto the answer to question S3W-4623 on 23 October 2007. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how it will implement its proposal to exempt dwelling houses from land attachment.
Answer
The Scottish Governmentis concerned that the provisions relating to land attachment, contained in the Bankruptcyand Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007, should not have the unintendedconsequence of homelessness for a relatively small debt.
The Scottish Governmentis considering how to best achieve the exemption of the main dwelling house fromland attachment within the wider context of the implementation of diligence reform.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 26 September 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 23 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many applications for conjoined arrestment orders were made and granted in the sheriff courts in each year since 2002.
Answer
The information requestedfor 2002 is given in table 5.3 of
Civil Judicial Statistics 2002, which canbe found at
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/02/18897/33079.The number of applicationsfor conjoined arrestment orders made and granted in the sheriff courts, 2003 to2006, is provided in the following table.
| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
Applications made | 1,660 | 1,873 | 2,071 | 1,588 |
Applications granted | 1,184 | 1,452 | 1,544 | 1,170 |
Notes:
1. The data are managementinformation statistics which have not been subjected to the same quality assurancestandards as statistics produced by the Government Statistical Service. In addition,there are general concerns surrounding the accuracy of some of the civil judicialstatistics collected by the Scottish Government. Therefore, the data should be usedwith caution and it should be appreciated that firm conclusions cannot be drawnfrom the data provided.
2. Action is beingtaken to improve the accuracy and reliability of the civil judicial statistics collectedby the Scottish Government.
3. An applicationfor a conjoined arrestment order which has been granted may not necessarily resultin an earnings arrestment being carried out.
4. Applications grantedin one year may have been lodged in a preceding year.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 22 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether transitional funding for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Highland, following the dissolution of NHS Argyll and Clyde, will be available beyond 2009-10.
Answer
Based on current financialplans it is not expected that transitional funding will be required beyond 2009-10.We will continue to work closely with both NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Highland on all aspects of financialplanning.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it accepts the recommendations of the National Resource Allocation Committee report.
Answer
The report raisessome very important issues which must be considered within the context of the currentSpending Review. I am currently studying the report and its recommendations carefully,and have sent it to the Convener of the Health and Sport Committee asking that committeeto let me have its views by the end of November. I have also sent the report tothe chairs and chief executives of health boards.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what the funding implications will be for each NHS board if the recommendations of the National Resource Allocation Committee are implemented.
Answer
If any adjustmentsare made in health boards’ relative funding based on National Resource Allocation Committee’s (NRAC) report, I have confirmed that noboard would receive less funding than it does at present and any changes would bephased in over a number of years as has been the practice under both the previousSHARE and Arbuthnott formulae.
The earliest any proposedrevisions to the formula could be implemented is 2009-10.
The details of NRAC’sassessment of the impact of moving from Arbuthnott to NRAC are set out in table7.8 on page 85 of chapter 7 of the NRAC Final Report, a copy of which is availablein the Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Bib. number 43807). If all NRAC’sproposed changes to the Formula were implemented then this would result in the redistributionof £81.9 million (or 1.2%) of the total HCHS budget. This relatively small percentagefigure includes some significant changes for individual health boards.
- Asked by: Jackie Baillie, MSP for Dumbarton, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 09 October 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 October 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of the budget for NHS boards is allocated in recognition of rurality.
Answer
The Arbuthnott Formulais the result of multiplying a series of indices together, and as such there isno specific share of the budget allocated for rurality. The formula includes anadjustment for the unavoidable excess costs of delivering services to remote andrural areas. This resulting index is used along with indices for the age-sex profileand morbidity and life circumstances of the health boards’ populations to determinehow much more (or less) resource each board requires compared with its basic populationshare.