To ask the Scottish Executive what the benchmark for non-completion of courses is for each university in each year, and has been for which figures are available, and what it will do to reduce non-completion rates.
The Scottish Executive does not set benchmarks for non-completion either for the sector as a whole or for individual institutions. However, the performance indicators published annually by the funding councils include calculations of benchmark figures for individual institutions on a range of measures, including for new entrants whose projected outcome at the end of their first year was neither an award nor a transfer to another higher education institute (HEI).
The table shows the benchmark percentage per institution. The benchmark represents only the expected performance of each institution based on average actual performance across the sector, after taking account of some of the factors which contribute to the differences between institutions such as subjects of study available and the age and previous qualifications of entrants. The performance indicators, and their associated benchmarks, are not targets. They simply contribute to the range of information which is gathered on our HEIs and their students.
The Scottish Higher Education Funding Council (SHEFC) introduced its Widening Access Premium in 2001-02. The premium is to support institutions in improving the retention and progression of students from under-represented areas. In 2004-05, SHEFC will allocate over £5 million through the Widening Access Premium.
We are at present working with the representative bodies in the sector and the funding council to set new sector-wide targets for improvement in access from the most economically disadvantaged groups and for the retention of students of all backgrounds, and will monitor performance against these.
We are also supporting initiatives which will help those entering higher education to choose the most relevant course for them, and which will improve the quality of the student experience, both of which should have a positive impact on retention. To this end, we will improve the quality and consistency of information for all learners to ensure that they have a seamless service incorporating the provision of information and guidance. We are encouraging the development of more creative and flexible provision which recognises and responds to diverse needs. We are also supporting the new quality enhancement arrangements, under which HEIs will be expected to demonstrate that they have clear, well-managed strategies for promoting constant quality improvement across all aspects of learning and teaching. The Executive particularly welcomes the close involvement of students’ representatives in designing and implementing this new system, and the recognition in the new arrangements of the importance of theoverall quality of the student experience.
Institution | Bench-Mark, Neither Award Nor Transfer |
2000-01 | 1999-2000 | 1998-99 |
% | % | % |
University of Aberdeen | 16 | 16 | 15 |
University of Abertay Dundee | 19 | 17 | 17 |
University of Dundee | 15 | 14 | 14 |
University of Edinburgh | 8 | 8 | 9 |
Edinburgh College of Art | 14 | 14 | 17 |
University of Glasgow | 11 | 13 | 15 |
Glasgow Caledonian University | 16 | 17 | 16 |
Glasgow School of Art | 13 | 16 | 18 |
Heriot-Watt University | 14 | 14 | 15 |
Napier University | 18 | 18 | 19 |
University of Paisley | 16 | 17 | 16 |
Queen Margaret University College | 16 | 15 | 15 |
Robert Gordon University | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Royal Scottish Academy of Music & Drama | 17 | 17 | 15 |
University of St Andrews | 9 | 9 | 10 |
University of Stirling | 16 | 16 | 15 |
University of Strathclyde | 12 | 12 | 13 |
Source: HEFCE