- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what its estimate was of the average time it would take for graduates to repay their student loans and how this compares to the actual time taken in each year since the student loans system was introduced.
Answer
For a 2005 graduate commencing repayment in 2006 the forecast average length of time to repay their student loan is approximately 13 years. It is not possible to provide details on the actual time taken for graduates to repay their student loans in each year since the student loan system was introduced. This information cannot be provided until all loans are repaid.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-14023 by Mr Jim Wallace on 25 February 2005, whether there were any variations to the contract for the administration of the student loan debt portfolio after the contract with the Student Loans Company expired in March 2004 and was awarded to another agency and, if so, what those variations were.
Answer
This information is not held by the Scottish Executive.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-14031 by Nicol Stephen on 25 October 2005, whether the Student Loans Company is a creditor for the purposes of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 and, if so, whether a bankrupt student loan borrower would be required to notify the Student Loans Company of their bankrupt status.
Answer
The Student Loans Company should be considered as a creditor and the debtor would list the Student Loans Company as such so that the Student Loans Company can be notified.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many student loan debts for Scottish-domiciled borrowers have been written off and what the total cash value was of the deleted debt in each year of operation of the Student Loans Company.
Answer
The information is given in the following table
| Scotland |
Academic Year | Borrowers | Write-Off Amount |
1-9-1998 | 2,567 | 183,822 |
1-9-1999 | 1,304 | 139,049 |
1-9-2000 | 1,598 | 208,853 |
1-9-2001 | 1,971 | 356,625 |
1-9-2002 | 2,214 | 319,785 |
1-9-2003 | 2,087 | 370,245 |
1-9-2004 | 2,031 | 439,132 |
1-9-2005 | 548 | 205,767 |
Grand Total | 14,320 | 2,223,278 |
Source: Student Loans Company.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many student loan debts have been written off and what the total cash value is of the deleted debt.
Answer
The information is given in the following table.
| All UK |
Academic Year | Borrowers | Write-Off Amount (£) |
1-9-1998 | 29,371 | 1,481,792 |
1-9-1999 | 14,276 | 1,150,696 |
1-9-2000 | 17,448 | 1,591,242 |
1-9-2001 | 21,636 | 2,256,821 |
1-9-2002 | 23,958 | 2,930,677 |
1-9-2003 | 21,515 | 3,155,217 |
1-9-2004 | 19,294 | 3,622,648 |
1-9-2005 | 5,389 | 2,071,678 |
Grand Total | 152,887 | 18,260,772 |
Source: Student Loans Company.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how much it expects to pay in total in subsidies for student loans sold to banks in 1998 and 1999.
Answer
The subsidies are determined by a formula using daily closing portfolio value multiplied by a subsidy rate. This rate comprises three elements - the margin which is fixed for the life of the contract; the RPI interest rate which changes annually, and the one-month LIBOR interest rate. On this basis, no original total subsidy amount was agreed and no definitive outstanding amount can therefore be determined.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is responsible for paying to purchasing banks the outstanding value of student loans of borrowers whose loans were sold by HM Treasury in 1998 and 1999 and who subsequently satisfied one or more of the conditions for having their student loan written off.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is responsible for paying the purchasing banks the actual costs in respect of Scottish borrowers whose loans were sold.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Allan Wilson on 16 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how many deferral applications from Scottish-domiciled students and graduates the Student Loans Company has received in each year of its operation, stating what percentage this represents of all Scottish-domiciled students and graduates due to be in repayment that year.
Answer
The information is given in the following table.
1. Date of Entry to Repayment (1st April) | 2. Mortgage Style Customers entering Rep't | 3. Number Deferring at 31 March |
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
1991 | 88 | 6 | 7% | 6 | 7% | 4 | 5% | 3 | 3% |
1992 | 5,107 | 167 | 3% | 127 | 2% | 116 | 2% | 94 | 2% |
1993 | 7,184 | 525 | 7% | 427 | 6% | 364 | 5% | 316 | 4% |
1994 | 8,208 | 1,007 | 12% | 881 | 11% | 790 | 10% | 635 | 8% |
1995 | 8,491 | 1,705 | 20% | 1,463 | 17% | 1,261 | 15% | 1057 | 12% |
1996 | 11,608 | 2,822 | 24% | 2,432 | 21% | 2,149 | 19% | 1864 | 16% |
1997 | 12,223 | 3,930 | 32% | 3,411 | 28% | 3,027 | 25% | 2570 | 21% |
1998 | 14,476 | 6,310 | 44% | 5,558 | 38% | 4,960 | 34% | 4328 | 30% |
1999 | 13,277 | 6,864 | 52% | 5,986 | 45% | 5,363 | 40% | 4669 | 35% |
2000 | 15,262 | 9,323 | 61% | 8,244 | 54% | 7,250 | 48% | 6179 | 40% |
2001 | 16,085 | 11,642 | 72% | 9,900 | 62% | 8,824 | 55% | 7294 | 45% |
2002 | 14,669 | - | | 10,513 | 72% | 9,177 | 63% | 7730 | 53% |
2003 | 5,250 | - | | - | | 3,626 | 69% | 2961 | 56% |
2004 | 1,414 | - | | - | | - | | 915 | 65% |
Total | 133,342 | 44,301 | 33% | 48,948 | 37% | 46,911 | 35% | 40,615 | 30% |
Source: Student Loans Company.
1. refers to the date of entry to repayment.
2. refers to the number of mortgage style customers entering repayment.
3. refers to the number and percentage of students in column 2 who are in deferment from 2002 to 2005.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 October 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 9 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is acceptable that I received a reply from the Director of Corporate Affairs of the office of the Water Industry Commissioner for Scotland regarding complaints made by a constituent which failed to answer these complaints, despite assurances in a letter of 13 April 2005 from the then Deputy Minister for Environment and Rural Development that "I have asked the Commissioner himself to write to the constituent, copied to you, at his earliest convenience explaining the situation and answering the points raised".
Answer
I am sorry that thecommissioner, because of absence on business, did not himself respond initially.I understand that he has written to you personally in the last few days apologisingand offering to address any issues you believe have not been fully covered in hisoffice’s earlier response to your constituent’s concerns.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 13 October 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Rhona Brankin on 8 November 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is acceptable for the office of the Water Industry Commissioner for Scotland not to respond fully to my letter of 9 June 2005 asking why it had failed to answer a constituent's letters, emails and recorded delivery letters since February 2005 about an interruption to the water supply.
Answer
The Executive expects all publicbodies to respond fully to all points raised in communications with them.