Questions and answers

Question reference: S2W-30148

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 29 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what percentage of the population have been in receipt of income support in each year since 1999, also broken down by local authority area.

The following table shows thepercentage of population aged 16 to 59 claiming Income Support by Scottishlocal authority.

Percentage of the PopulationAged 16 to 59 Claiming Income Support, 1999-2006

Local Authority	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006
Aberdeen City	5.6	5.9	6.1	6.4	6.4	6.3	5.9	5.8
Aberdeenshire	3.3	3.5	3.6	3.7	3.6	3.4	3.3	3.2
Angus	4.9	5.2	5.4	5.5	5.6	5.5	5.2	5.1
Argyll and Bute	5.5	5.5	5.6	5.7	5.6	5.4	5.2	5.0
Clackmannanshire	8.2	8.4	8.8	8.6	8.7	8.3	8.0	8.1
Dumfries and Galloway	5.5	5.6	5.8	5.9	5.9	5.8	5.7	5.7
Dundee City	10.1	10.2	10.4	10.6	10.5	10.5	10.0	9.7
East Ayrshire	8.4	8.6	8.8	8.8	8.7	8.8	8.5	8.4
East Dunbartonshire	3.7	3.8	4.0	4.0	3.9	3.8	3.7	3.6
East Lothian	5.9	5.8	5.7	5.8	5.6	5.3	5.1	5.1
East Renfrewshire	4.1	4.2	4.2	4.3	4.3	4.1	3.9	3.8
Edinburgh, City of	6.7	6.7	6.7	6.6	6.5	6.2	6.0	5.9
Eilean Siar	5.0	5.1	5.0	5.1	5.1	5.0	4.7	4.5
Falkirk	6.8	7.1	7.0	7.0	6.9	6.6	6.4	6.2
Fife	6.4	6.4	6.5	6.5	6.6	6.4	6.2	6.2
Glasgow City	16.2	16.5	16.4	16.2	15.5	14.8	14.1	13.7
Highland	5.6	5.8	5.8	6.0	5.9	5.8	5.5	5.5
Inverclyde	11.5	11.6	11.7	11.9	11.5	10.9	10.5	10.3
Midlothian	6.4	6.3	6.4	6.4	6.2	6.1	5.8	5.5
Moray	4.5	4.7	4.8	4.7	4.5	4.3	4.2	4.1
North Ayrshire	9.4	9.6	9.8	10.0	9.7	9.5	8.9	8.8
North Lanarkshire	9.5	9.7	9.9	9.9	9.8	9.3	9.0	8.7
Orkney Islands	3.2	3.2	3.4	3.5	3.5	3.3	3.2	3.2
Perth and Kinross	4.6	4.7	4.9	4.7	4.7	4.6	4.5	4.4
Renfrewshire	8.4	8.6	9.0	8.9	8.9	8.4	8.0	7.9
Scottish Borders	4.3	4.5	4.7	4.9	4.8	4.5	4.4	4.4
Shetland Islands	3.3	3.5	3.3	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.4	3.4
South Ayrshire	6.7	6.8	6.9	7.1	7.1	6.9	6.9	6.6
South Lanarkshire	7.9	8.0	8.2	8.2	8.1	7.8	7.3	7.1
Stirling	5.8	5.7	5.7	5.7	5.6	5.4	5.2	5.2
West Dunbartonshire	10.9	11.1	11.2	11.4	11.4	10.8	10.5	10.3
West Lothian	6.9	6.9	6.9	7.0	7.0	6.7	6.5	6.4
Scotland	7.8	8.0	8.1	8.1	8.0	7.7	7.4	7.2

Source: Benefit claimants fromDWP Information Directorate: Work and PensionsLongitudinal Study. Populations from GRO(S) mid year population estimates.

Note: August snapshot for allyears except May 2006.

Question reference: S2W-30049

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Johann Lamont on 29 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24528 by Hugh Henry on 11 April 2006, how many individuals were unable to access residential drug rehabilitation places in each year since 2001-02 due to insufficient numbers of beds.

Question reference: S2W-29155

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 October 2006
Current Status: Answered by Nicol Stephen on 29 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how much direct funding through business grants or other financial assistance was given to businesses in Scotland under (a) R&D Plus, (b) Research and Development Assistance, (c) Regional Selective Assistance, (d) SMART awards, (e) SPUR support and (f) venture capital investment, broken down by (i) year since 1996 and (ii) local authority area.

The information that my departmentholds is set out in the following tables.

R&D PLUS*

Expenditure by Financial Year

Financial Year	Actual Amount Paid
2003-04	£2,299,842
2004-05	£2,602,963
2005-06	£3,865,570
Total	£8,768,375

Expenditure During Period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2006 BrokenDown by Local Enterprise Company Area

Local Enterprise Area	Actual Amount Paid
SEn Ayrshire	£485,870
SEn Dumfries and Galloway	£950,000
SEn Edinburgh and Lothian	£6,750,281
SEn Forth Valley	£325,008
SEn Lanarkshire	£10,091
SEn Renfrewshire	£186,250
SEn Tayside	£60,875
Total	£8,768,375

Note: *R&D Plus is administeredby Scottish Enterprise and was launched in 2003-04. The information is recordedby Local Enterprise Company (LEC) area. Expenditure figures for individuallocal authority areas are not maintained centrally.

Research and Development Assistance*

Expenditure by Financial Year

Financial Year	Actual Amount Paid
2003-04	£1,381,132
2004-05	£930,023
2005-06	£1,750,146
Total	£4,061,301

Expenditure During Period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2006 BrokenDown by Local Enterprise Company Area

Scottish Enterprise LEC Area	Actual Amount Paid
SEn Ayrshire	£152,894
SEn Borders	£337,497
SEn Dumfries and Galloway	£138,497
SEn Dunbartonshire	£95,632
SEn Edinburgh and Lothian	£268,595
SEn Fife	£251,581
SEn Forth Valley	£197,896
SEn Glasgow	£400,865
SEn Grampian	£231,240
SEn Lanarkshire	£372,177
SEn Renfrewshire	£312,883
SEn Tayside	£207,687
Highlands and Islands LEC Areas
Argyll and The Islands Enterprise	£151,185
Caithness and Sutherland Enterprise	£33,005
Highlands and Islands Enterprise	£425,718
Inverness and Nairn Enterprise	£176,328
Moray, Badenoch and Strathspey Enterprise	£20,229
Orkney Enterprise	£5,174
Ross and Cromarty Enterprise	£71,545
Skye and Lochalsh Enterprise	£72,425
Shetland Enterprise	£80,435
Western Isles Enterprise	£57,813
Total	£4,061,301

Note: *The figures quoted arefor Highlands and Islands Enterprise’s R&D Scheme for SMEs and the R&D componentof Scottish Enterprise’s equivalent Small Company Innovation Support Scheme. Theinformation is recorded by local enterprise company area. Expenditure figures forindividual local authority areas are not maintained centrally.

Regional Selective Assistance,SMART, SPUR and SPUR^PLUS*

Actual Expenditure by FinancialYear

Financial Year	Regional Selective Assistance	SMART	SPUR	SPUR^PLUS
1996-97	£69,819,389	£1,236,901	£828,115	£32,002
1997-98	£74,262,000	£1,088,108	£1,405,225	£303,553
1998-99	£73,388,795	£1,105,874	£1,876,711	£630,503
1999-2000	£51,966,770	£1,595,409	£1,724,540	£1,246,901
2000-01	£70,054,355	£1,390,492	£582,599	£1,251,306
2001-02	£44,204,850	£1,771,989	£275,845	£2,134,638
2002-03	£36,381,856	£2,532,689	£308,111	£3,638,633
2003-04	£41,992,800	£2,293,843	£624,160	£3,165,202
2004-05	£45,482,300	£2,105,530	£1,312,949	£3,933,627
2005-06	£35,995,000	£2,126,104	£2,587,653	£2,455,196
Total	£543,548,115	£17,246,939	£11,525,908	£18,791,561

Actual Expenditure During Period1 April 1996 to 31 March 2006 Broken Down by Local Authority Area

Council Area	Regional Selective Assistance	SMART	SPUR	SPUR^PLUS
Aberdeen City	0	£2,463,363	£1,242,091	£716,051
Aberdeenshire	0	£264,983	£172,599	0
Angus	£3,805,000	£316,135	£226,739	0
Argyll and Bute	£114,000	£121,834	0	0
Borders	£2,402,200	£253,615	0	0
Clackmannanshire	£3,189,600	£75,000	0	£437,079
Dumfries and Galloway	£4,764,000	£45,000	£33,682	0
Dundee City	£12,656,889	£441,481	£434,604	£2,777,117
East Ayrshire	£11,679,200	£91,667	0	0
East Dunbartonshire	£11,328,000	£161,486	£11,061	0
East Lothian	0	£151,964	£262,755	£221,980
East Renfrewshire	£2,210,000	0	0	£317,602
City of Edinburgh	£3,155,000	£3,384,622	£2,171,607	£4,484,429
Falkirk	£4,783,100	£399,756	£373,210	0
Fife	£67,970,100	£918,489	£484,836	£425,000
Glasgow City	£67,423,803	£2,777,711	£2,152,216	£1,982,586
Highland	£1,100,000	£323,994	£101,992	0
Inverclyde	£16,369,000	£45,000	0	0
Midlothian	0	£1,161,145	£623,186	£2,244,845
North Ayrshire	£41,240,750	£79,171	£54,805	0
North Lanarkshire	£60,953,093	£533,180	£511,635	£1,658,873
Orkney Islands	0	£45,000	0	0
Perth and Kinross	£275,000	£256,821	£219,958	£393,164
Renfrewshire	£45,571,000	£185,779	£274,061	£555,820
South Ayrshire	£9,091,000	£284,290	£196,002	£338,300
South Lanarkshire	£66,617,724	£377,960	£144,060	£567,947
Stirling	£1,912,000	£485,514	£420,409	0
West Dunbartonshire	£8,380,000	£548,684	0	0
Western Isles	0	£61,626	0	0
West Lothian	£96,557,656	£991,668	£1,414,400	£1,670,770
Total	£543,548,115	£17,246,938	£11,525,908	£18,791,563

Note: *The above figures areactuals. The Scottish Executive moved to accruals accounting in 2000-01. Therefore,the figures above may differ from other published figures. Accruals figures forindividual Council Areas are not held.

Venture Capital Investment*

Expenditure by Financial Year

Financial Year	Actual Amount Invested
1996-97	£5,486,000
1997-98	£5,799,000
1998-99	£6,559,000
1999-2000	£8,983,000
2000-01	£18,533,000
2001-02	£10,906,000
2002-03	£4,410,000
2003-04	£10,322,000
2004-05	£12,325,000
2005-06	£23,105,000
Total	£106,428,000

Note: *The above figures aretaken from the Scottish Enterprise published accounts for the years in questionand relate to investments undertaken on commercial terms. Information on expenditurewithin individual local authority or local enterprise company areas is notmaintained centrally.

Question reference: S2W-30050

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Johann Lamont on 29 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-24528 by Hugh Henry on 11 April 2006, what funding was provided for residential rehabilitation services in each year since 2001-02.

The Executive provided £6.8million per annum to local authorities in the three years 2001-02 to 2003-04 specificallyto support drug rehabilitation services. Thereafter this funding was incorporatedinto Grant Aided Expenditure (GAE).

In addition, we provide £23.7million annually to NHS boards for drug treatment services.

Planning of services is doneat local rather than national level. Alcohol and Drug Action Teams (ADATs) and theirpartner agencies are responsible for assessing needs and commissioning servicesin their local areas, including residential services aimed at the rehabilitationof drug users.

Question reference: S2W-29784

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 10 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 24 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how many eligible applicants it estimates will have to wait until after the winter for (a) the provision of free central heating and insulation under its central heating programme and (b) grants to have their homes insulated under the Warm Deal scheme, broken down by local authority area.

I have asked Angiolina Foster,Chief Executive of Communities Scotland to respond. Her response is as follows:

Information is not kept in theform requested covering local authority area but by main postcode area.

The central heating and WarmDeal Programmes are demand-led. The number of people waiting and the length of timeeach individual has to wait are dependent on the number of eligible applicants andthe target number of installations in any one year. The average waiting time iscurrently around six months. Where householders require gas connections, electricalupgrades, building warrants etc it may, in some circumstances, take longer for themto receive the measures.

The target number of centralheating and warm deal installations in 2006-07 is 12,000 and 12,800 respectively.However, to address the continuing high demandwe are allocating an additional £5 million, between now and the end of this financialyear, to help up to 5,000 more householders benefit from these successfulprogrammes.

Question reference: S2W-29785

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 10 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 22 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the (a) average and (b) longest waiting times have been for the (i) assessment of eligible applications and (ii) awarding of grants under the Warm Deal scheme in each year since its introduction, broken down by local authority area.

Question reference: S2W-29767

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 10 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 22 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how many eligible householders received free central heating, insulation and other benefits worth around £3,000 per household by March 2006 from the Executive’s 2005-06 budget of £57 million for its central heating programme and Warm Deal scheme.

Question reference: S2W-29786

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 10 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 22 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what the (a) average and (b) longest waiting times have been for the (i) assessment of eligible applications and (ii) installation of central heating under its central heating programme in each year since its introduction, broken down by local authority area.

Question reference: S2W-29787

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 10 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 22 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive how many eligible applicants have waited for at least six months for (a) the provision of free central heating and insulation under its central heating programme and (b) grants to have their homes insulated under the Warm Deal scheme in each year since the initiatives were introduced, broken down by local authority area.

Question reference: S2W-29846

Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 November 2006
Current Status: Answered by Robert Brown on 22 November 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive when it estimates that the number of referrals to the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration on offence grounds will peak.

The Scottish Executive has madeno such estimates for either offence or non-offence grounds, nor are we in a positionto do so.

The multi-agency MinisterialTask Group, which was set up in the summer, has been developing a new way of workingfor the referrals process. The new model will help referring agencies to identifywhen compulsory measures might be needed and, when they are not, help agencies todeliver services for children much more quickly without a referral to thereporter.

We are primarily concerned thatchildren who offend or are at risk get an appropriate, proportionate and timelyresponse so that positive outcomes are secured. Where that may entail compulsorysupervision in an individual case, then the matter should be referred to theprincipal reporter.

Seòmar agus comataidhean