- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by David Steel on 18 May 2001
To ask the Presiding Officer why the official reports for meetings of committees of the Parliament are not published within seven days of a committee's last meeting and how the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body will ensure that committee members and interested parties have the Official Report before a committee's next meeting to allow all evidence to be considered.
Answer
The Official Report makes every effort to meet its target of publishing committee
Official Reports as quickly as possible and to agreed deadlines. The date of the next meeting is the first determinant of priority.The importance of timely publication is appreciated, but there are periods of more intense committee activity when the number, frequency and/or duration of meetings exceed the capacity to produce the
Official Report in time for a committee's next meeting. To address such situations, the following order of prioritisation was devised by the directorate of clerking and reporting and endorsed by the conveners group in April:
- Stage 2: non-Executive bills (including committee bills and members' bills)
- Consideration stage: private bills
- Major inquiry (eg SQA)
- Evidence at stage 1: Executive bills
- Evidence at stage 1: non-Executive bills (including committee bills and members' bills)
- Preliminary stage: private bills
- Other evidence
Details of publication dates are in the official report's production schedule, which is available on SPEIR and updated daily.There were 120 committee meetings in the 12 weeks between the Christmas and Easter recesses: the
Official Reports of all 120 were produced in time for the next meeting of the committee. There have been 59 meetings in the four weeks from 23 April to 18 May, during which time there was a heavy schedule of stage 2 meetings. The public holidays on 7 and 28 May cause significant delays in publication, but some Official Report staff will be working on the privilege holiday on 25 May to reduce the backlog.The SPCB addressed official report resourcing in February 2000. The consequential recruitment and training processes are on target to be completed by September.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 17 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will outline the Scottish Legal Aid Board's salary structure, for both staff and board members, indicating what the various salary bands are and how many people receive salaries in each band.
Answer
The figures are shown in the table.
Grade | Salary Band | No of posts in each band as at 31 March 2001 |
1 | £8,755 - £12,300 | 74 |
2 | £10,815 - £15,375 | 135 |
3 | £12,670 - £19,960 | 36 |
4 | £15,760 - £24,165 | 32 |
5 | £18,910 - £28,365 | 13 |
6 | £23,115 - £42,025 | 28 |
7 | £36,770 - £52,530 | 4 |
8 | £74,200 | 1 |
Board members | £7,409 for 24.5 hours per month | 10+1 unpaid |
Chairman | £25,123 for 56 hours per month | 1 |
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 17 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it discussed its proposals to free'e the Legal Aid Fund for the next three years with the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) prior to publishing its budget proposals and, if so, what SLAB's response was.
Answer
The Legal Aid Fund is not cash limited and therefore Scottish Ministers are required to provide whatever monies are necessary to meet the legal aid granted by the Scottish Legal Aid Board. There is therefore no question of a freeze on legal aid.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 03 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 17 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how many employees in each salary band left the Scottish Legal Aid Board in each of the last five years and what each of these figures represents as a percentage of the total number of posts in the board in each salary band in each year.
Answer
The figures are shown in the following table and exclude temporary staff.
| 1996-97 | 1997-98 | 1998-99 | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 |
Salary Band | No. of leavers | % of no of posts in band | No. of leavers | % of no of posts in band | No. of leavers | % of no of posts in band | No. of leavers | % of no of posts in band | No. of leavers | % of no of posts in band |
1 | 26 | 33 | 27 | 34 | 24 | 32 | 25 | 29 | 23 | 31 |
2 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 23 | 20 | 24 | 21 | 23 | 17 |
3 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 16 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 11 |
4 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 3 |
5 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
6 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
7 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 17 | 2 | 33 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total leavers | 43 | 14 | 51 | 18 | 67 | 24 | 58 | 20 | 54 | 17 |
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 16 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 15 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the statement by the First Minister on 15 February 2001 (Official Report, col. 1302) regarding the possibility that the trunk road maintenance contracts could be suspended or retendered after investigation by the Transport and the Environment Committee, what the cost implications would be in penalties and/or compensation of such courses of action.
Answer
The First Minister addressed the hypothetical situation where the report of Audit Scotland or the committee convinced ministers that there are serious difficulties with the contract. He further stated that there is no evidence whatever at this stage to justify such a course of action.The situation envisaged is clearly hypothetical and it is not possible to quantify possible penalties and/or compensation at this time.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 06 March 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 14 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it plans to have with Scottish Borders Council arising from the recent failure by Scottish Power to maintain power supplies to the Borders area.
Answer
None. Scottish Borders Council initiated its local emergency plan and acted upon this in conjunction with Scottish Power, Lothian and Borders Police and other emergency services. Throughout the emergency, officials kept in close touch with Scottish Power and submitted regular reports to ministers to keep them apprised of the overall response to the emergency situation. It will be a matter for Scottish Borders Council to review their emergency planning arrangements to see what, if anything, might be improved.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 28 February 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 14 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive how much each holder of a concessionary bus pass has to pay annually for this pass in each local authority area.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-13568 on 9 March 2001.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 14 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what funding was allocated specifically to child protection measures in (a) 1997-98, (b) 1998-99 and (c) 1999-2000.
Answer
I refer the Member to the answer given to question S1W-12814.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 January 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 14 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it specifies to which child protection measures funding should be directed and, if not, how the use of funding is monitored.
Answer
Funding for child protection is part of the general budgets of the many agencies involved such as Social Work Departments, health boards and the police, who have discretion to determine their own spending priorities. Expenditure specific to child protection is not therefore separately identified or monitored.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 19 April 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Angus MacKay on 10 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-14552 by Ms Wendy Alexander on 10 April 2001 regarding the emergency package for businesses affected by foot-and-mouth disease, (a) when the #3.5 million will be allocated, (b) how it will be allocated, (c) how businesses will access this funding, (d) how businesses will access the 75% funding of the costs of hardship relief and (e) whether any publicity material is being circulated to inform businesses of this funding and, if so, by what means and in which areas.
Answer
Businesses should apply to their local authority for hardship relief from rates. The additional funding of hardship relief in the 17 local authority areas will be provided through a redetermination of Revenue Support Grant in the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2002. The scheme is not cash limited and local authorities will need to make claims for this grant to the Scottish Executive by 30 September 2001, giving details of the rate relief given. Guidance has been issued to local authorities and copied to business representative organisations in Scotland. It is also available on the Executive's website
www.scotland.gov.uk/agri/footandmouth under "publications".