- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 11 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the revised guidance issued to Historic Scotland on the flying of the Saltire on St. Andrew's Day will include the flying of the Saltire from Edinburgh Castle in substitution for the Union flag, given that the castle is run by Historic Scotland on its behalf.
Answer
No revision is required for flag flying at Edinburgh Castle. The Saltire is flown every day at the Half Moon Battery within Edinburgh Castle by Historic Scotland. The Union flag is flown every day at the Clock Tower by the army. Historic Scotland's house flag is flown daily at the gatehouse. The Saltire is not substituted by the Union flag at any time throughout the year.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 30 April 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to provide secure accommodation in the Scottish Borders for young offenders, given an estimated required provision of five to six places and a lack of currently available provision.
Answer
The Secure Accommodation Advisory Group has provided a report on the availability and use of secure accommodation. I am considering the report's findings and will make an announcement on this shortly. However, in order to assist in the better strategic management of the secure estate, local authorities were asked in September 2001 to provide an estimate of their need for secure places. Borders Council indicated that their need for secure accommodation was steady annually, at one place and this need was being met.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1O-5174 by Cathy Jamieson on 9 May 2002, whether the funds for children and young people with special educational needs for 2002-03 and 2003-04 are ring-fenced and, if they are not ring-fenced, how it will monitor the use of the funding.
Answer
The £20 million of Inclusion Programme funding through the proposed National Priorities Action Fund is ring-fenced within the Social Justice strand of the fund in both 2002-03 and 2003-04. The £7.8 million for in-service training in special educational needs (SEN) for staff is also ring-fenced as Specific Grant in both 2002-03 and 2003-04. In addition, £5 million central government grant has been allocated through the SEN Innovation Grants Programme over 2002-03 and 2003-04, for the specific purpose of funding voluntary and non-statutory organisations across Scotland to carry out projects in the field of special educational needs.A further £8.8 million central government grant is allocated to the seven grant-aided special schools for 2002-03, for the specific purpose of supporting these schools, and is provided under the Special Schools (Scotland) Grant Regulations 1990.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive when the last structural survey of the buildings at HM Prison Peterhead was commissioned given the statement in the Scottish Prison Services Estates Review that "the buildings are exhausted".
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) to respond. His response is as follows:Full structural surveys, which are expensive, are not normally commissioned unless indications from visual inspections, settlement or other problems indicate that they are necessary. A visual survey was carried out in August 1994 to ascertain the extent of the problem of rain penetration through the numerous cracks in the mass concrete walls. This survey also included investigation of external wall foundations at four locations. We do not believe a full structural survey now is necessary or would be good value for taxpayers money, as we already know that the cells are too small for integral sanitation; there is no access to night sanitation; there is no electrical power in cells or in cell fire detection system; the windows are below SPS security standards and non-compliant with the current building regulations in terms of daylight factor and natural ventilation, and site services for electricity, gas, water and drainage are at full capacity, indeed at times overloaded, or in need of replacement. The term "state of exhaustion" is a brief summary of the factors which make the current accommodation not in our view fit for purpose.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the cost of repair and refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court is in the order of #1 million and, if not, what the figure is.
Answer
Yes, the cost of repair and refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court is estimated to be in the order of £1 million.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will publish the report into the refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court.
Answer
The report into the refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court will be available to interested parties once a conclusion on this matter has been reached.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 10 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive who prepared the report on the refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court.
Answer
The report on the refurbishment of Peebles Sheriff Court was prepared for the Scottish Court Service by Keppie Design, Architects, in partnership with Currie & Brown, Quantity Surveyors, White Young Green Consulting Engineers and Melville Dundas, Contractor.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25236 by Mr Jim Wallace on 3 May 2002, how it reconciles the answer with the evidence given by Michael Crossan, former deputy governor of Low Moss to the Justice 1 Committee on 14 May 2002 (Official Report col. 3544), that Eric Murch had prepared the report Constructing the Future.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:The Constructing the Future report bore the name of Eric Murch as he was governor of Low Moss at the time, but as stated by Mike Crossan it was prepared in conjunction with the management team at Low Moss.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-25069 by Colin Boyd on 29 April 2002, what the reason is for the rise in the number of cases marked "no proceedings" as a result of delay by the police and other reporting agencies since 1998-99.
Answer
This information is not held centrally. However, we are addressing the timeliness of reporting with the police and other reporting agencies.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 May 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Elish Angiolini on 5 June 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the reason is for the decline in the number and proportion of cases reported to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service being sent to the district court since 1997-98.
Answer
The reduction in business in the district court is a consequence of the reduction in the overall number of cases reported to the procurator fiscal, the availability of fiscal fines and other alternatives to prosecution and the shift in the balance of business towards more serious crime.