- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, with reference to the report from the Expert Advisory Group on Infertility Services in Scotland, Evidence & Equity, published in April 1999, it will review the eligibility criteria for assisted contraception.
Answer
The Scottish Programme forClinical Effectiveness in Reproductive Health (SPCERH), commissioned by theChief Medical Officer, recently held aconsensus conference to reconsider the eligibility criteria for access to NHSfunded infertility treatment. The Executive are currently reviewing the feedbackfrom the conference and are also reviewing the current level of serviceprovision across the NHS boards. If after the completion of these reviews therewas a recommendation to change the criteria then this would be subject to afull public consultation.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps will be taken to introduce guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of all sleep disorders, in light of the finding of the report endorsed by the British Sleep Society, Dead Tired, that there are 84 sleep disorders.
Answer
There are no plans to takeany action directly related to this report. However, the ScottishIntercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), which is funded by the Executivethrough NHS Quality Improvement Scotland to produce good practice clinicalguidelines, published a guideline on the management of Obstructive SleepApnoea/Hypopnoea Syndrome (OSAHS) in September 2003. OSAHS is the most commonsleep disorder with a treatable medical cause, and the one which is believed tobe a factor in a significant number of traffic accidents. Copies of SIGNguidelines are available through the Parliament’s Reference Centre.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what research has been undertaken into the (a) scale (b) effects and (c) cost of sleep disorders, in light of the recommendations of the report endorsed by the British Sleep Society, Dead Tired.
Answer
No research has been commissionedby the Executive as a direct result of this report. The Chief Scientist Officeof the Scottish Executive Health Department is currently funding one Edinburgh Universityresearch project, “Screening for Sleep Apnoea/Hypoponoea Syndrome and drivingimpairment in professional drivers”.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-23349 by Malcolm Chisholm on 19 March 2002, how many patients currently receive continuous positive airway pressure therapy for sleep apnoea.
Answer
As at 31 December 2003,there were 2,585 patients receiving Continuous Positive Airways Pressure (CPAP)therapy.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 30 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-23350 by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 March 2002, how many patients are currently on the waiting list for a first appointment at the Sleep Centre in Edinburgh; how, in relation to the answer, it defines “clinical priority”, and what the average waiting time is for a first appointment for those defined as being (a) a “clinical priority” and (b) “routine”.
Answer
There are 655 patientsawaiting a first appointment, and 25 patients (whose initial referral recommendsit) awaiting a first appointment and sleep study.
“Clinical priority” refersto patients such as those who may be at risk of falling asleep whilst undertakingactivities such as driving, or operating machinery, and to patients with otherrelevant medical conditions, such as cardiac disease.
There is no waiting list for“clinical priority” patients as they are given appointments immediately. Suchpatients may wait two to six weeks to be seen at appointment. “Routine” refersto all patients without priority.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive whether interim funding can be provided to projects such as “In Touch” in Galashiels whose funding will end prior to the conclusion of the New Futures Fund.
Answer
Scottish Enterprise andHighlands & Islands Enterprise are currently funding a range of projects inphase 2 of NFF. The contracts for a small number of projects, including “InTouch”, are due to end in March 2004. We are considering, with the EnterpriseNetworks, the scope for additional, or alternative sources of funding in order tobring these in line with the rest of the programme.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive when the final evaluation of the New Futures Fund will be published.
Answer
Scottish Enterpriseand Highlands & Islands Enterprise will both be publishing their finalevaluations of phase 2 of the New Futures Fund in February 2005.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 10 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to support projects such as “In Touch” in Galashiels after their New Futures funding ends.
Answer
The objective is tomainstream NFF after phase 2 in order that the type of activity and approachdeveloped by projects, including “In Touch”, are more widely available. Mainstreamingis a top priority for the Enterprise Networks. Scottish Enterprise has identifiedtwo ways in which mainstreaming might be achieved:
- When existing services provided by New Futures projects continue to be provided directly by mainstream statutory agencies (either through being brought in house or through the statutory agency contracting with voluntary sector agencies to provide the services: and/ or
When mainstream statutory,voluntary or private sector agencies adapt their existing service provision to respondmore adequately to and meet the identified needs of New Futures clients.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 26 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 9 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive when the pay modernisation team looking at the impact of the general medical services and consultant contracts is expected to report and whether the report will include consideration of any retrospective implications for NHS boards.
Answer
The pay modernisation teamis co-ordinating a wide range of work at local and national level to aid theimplementation of the general medical services and consultants’ contract and tohelp oversee delivery of the contracts and their impact. This is an on-goingprocess taken forward through a number of strands and involving regular updatesand advice on implementation and its consequences. This work does involveconsideration of retrospective implications.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 23 January 2004
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 6 February 2004
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-158 by Mr Jim Wallace on 3 June 2003, how much has been received by each further education college for social inclusion in each of the years referred to (a) excluding any funding attributable to the location of the college being in a rural area and (b) expressed also as a percentage of each college's budget.
Answer
The information requested is as follows:
| College | 2000-01 | 2001-02 | 2002-03 |
| | Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation | Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation | Total specific social inclusion element | % specific social inclusion to core allocation |
| Aberdeen College | £115,257 | 0.75% | £279,914 | 1.73% | £313,326 | 1.87% |
| Angus College | £27,786 | 0.65% | £49,375 | 1.05% | £50,976 | 1.05% |
| Anniesland College | £256,365 | 4.95% | £504,858 | 8.90% | £530,400 | 9.10% |
| Ayr College | £82,338 | 1.46% | £194,423 | 3.08% | £228,091 | 3.52% |
| Banff and Buchan College of Further Education | £819 | 0.02% | £1,818 | 0.04% | £2,341 | 0.05% |
| The Barony College | £8,871 | 0.70% | £10,018 | 0.71% | £11,167 | 0.78% |
| Borders College | £957 | 0.02% | £3,737 | 0.09% | £2,849 | 0.07% |
| Cardonald College | £256,339 | 3.38% | £507,839 | 6.09% | £549,134 | 6.29% |
| Central College of Commerce | £134,295 | 2.92% | £312,708 | 6.70% | £383,692 | 7.82% |
| Clackmannan College of Further Education | £39,253 | 1.54% | £71,797 | 2.58% | £71,157 | 2.51% |
| Clydebank College | £210,907 | 3.32% | £352,497 | 5.51% | £362,290 | 5.54% |
| Coatbridge College | £120,543 | 3.13% | £249,642 | 6.01% | £277,925 | 6.54% |
| Cumbernauld College | £25,657 | 0.81% | £60,515 | 1.82% | £85,598 | 2.53% |
| Dumfries and Galloway College | £36,736 | 0.82% | £78,953 | 1.69% | £87,414 | 1.87% |
| Dundee College | £270,339 | 2.63% | £522,863 | 4.45% | £607,668 | 4.97% |
| Edinburgh's Telford College | £198,813 | 1.52% | £395,741 | 2.92% | £436,261 | 3.13% |
| Elmwood College | £8,072 | 0.24% | £16,130 | 0.44% | £21,046 | 0.55% |
| Falkirk College of Further and Higher Education | £92,192 | 1.05% | £181,450 | 1.89% | £207,886 | 2.05% |
| Fife College of Further and Higher Education | £112,473 | 1.58% | £244,891 | 3.10% | £266,292 | 3.24% |
| Glasgow College of Building & Printing | £139,200 | 2.11% | £313,173 | 4.51% | £356,887 | 4.89% |
| Glasgow College of Food Technology | £91,455 | 2.97% | £273,557 | 7.89% | £258,752 | 7.23% |
| Glasgow College of Nautical Studies | £119,644 | 3.04% | £208,757 | 5.03% | £250,934 | 5.78% |
| Glenrothes College | £32,944 | 0.64% | £80,217 | 1.46% | £94,603 | 1.66% |
| Inverness College | £20,621 | 0.34% | £40,335 | 0.82% | £41,912 | 0.81% |
| James Watt College of Further and Higher Education | £281,725 | 2.05% | £771,276 | 4.58% | £781,620 | 4.48% |
| Jewel and Esk Valley College | £79,881 | 1.12% | £151,101 | 1.97% | £164,458 | 2.09% |
| John Wheatley College | £272,332 | 7.07% | £342,172 | 7.93% | £406,437 | 8.97% |
| Kilmarnock College | £87,962 | 1.54% | £227,707 | 3.85% | £255,300 | 4.17% |
| Langside College | £179,501 | 2.71% | £387,034 | 6.04% | £433,678 | 7.28% |
| Lauder College | £50,681 | 0.90% | £104,890 | 1.71% | £144,578 | 2.30% |
| Lews Castle College | £154 | 0.01% | £333 | 0.02% | £524 | 0.04% |
| Moray College | £2,695 | 0.06% | £4,308 | 0.13% | £2,687 | 0.08% |
| Motherwell College | £211,157 | 2.56% | £445,416 | 4.69% | £528,230 | 5.40% |
| North Glasgow College | £114,838 | 2.29% | £311,894 | 5.53% | £385,984 | 6.57% |
| Oatridge Agricultural College | £7,947 | 0.45% | £11,414 | 0.63% | £17,139 | 0.90% |
| Perth College | £23,560 | 0.43% | £33,381 | 0.79% | £33,597 | 0.79% |
| Reid Kerr College | £204,736 | 2.47% | £473,557 | 5.06% | £506,320 | 5.29% |
| South Lanarkshire College | £52,604 | 1.38% | £108,815 | 2.68% | £112,477 | 2.67% |
| Stevenson College Edinburgh | £174,005 | 1.57% | £350,942 | 3.27% | £309,010 | 3.12% |
| Stow College | £153,122 | 2.84% | £248,674 | 4.50% | £301,584 | 5.18% |
| The North Highland College | £2,006 | 0.07% | £4,275 | 0.17% | £9,148 | 0.35% |
| West Lothian College | £33,116 | 0.83% | £73,292 | 1.39% | £95,256 | 1.84% |
| Orkney College | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% |
| Shetland College of Further Education | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% | £0 | 0.00% |
Source: Scottish FurtherEducation Funding Council.
Notes:
1.The social inclusion elements are shown as a percentage of the core formulafunding allocation to colleges. This represents the majority of fundingallocated to colleges by the Scottish Further Education Funding Council(SFEFC). It excludes other SFEFC funding outwith the core formula. This caninclude claims based grants (e.g. fee waiver); funding to support students'living costs which is not core teaching activity; one off funds paid tocolleges for specific projects; and funds paid to other bodies to support thework of colleges. To include funds such as these in the comparison would bemisleading as much of the funding cannot be split by college and/or isconceptually different to core funding.
2. There has been somedebate over the basis on which the social inclusion elements of college fundingare calculated. The element which supports entry costs and retention aretriggered in respect of students living in Scotland’s 20% most deprivedpostcodes, which are generally in urban areas. SFEFC is currently reviewing howthe funding methodology takes account of remoteness.
