- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to reports that some people buying a home through the New Supply Shared Equity scheme have experienced financial uncertainty, including by having to reapply for a mortgage at a time of higher interest rates, as a result of extensive delays to The Victoria development in Glasgow.
Answer
The Scottish Government sympathises with those who are experiencing financial uncertainty as a result of delays in this development, either due to a change in personal circumstances or having to arrange a new mortgage agreement. We are aware that the increase in mortgage rates will make it more difficult for many purchasers across the housing market to both obtain mortgage lending or access it due to a decreased number of products available, even with the financial assistance available through New Supply Shared Equity.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what correspondence it has had with (a) Sanctuary and (b) Cruden regarding the reportedly extensive delays to The Victoria development in Glasgow.
Answer
The Scottish Government has not had any correspondence with Sanctuary or Cruden regarding delays to The Victoria development in Glasgow. Glasgow City Council receives funding for its affordable housing supply programme (AHSP) from the Scottish Government through the Transfer of Management of Development Funding (TMDF) arrangement. Working in partnership with local housing providers, the Council is responsible for the management and delivery of the housing programme, which includes The Victoria development, on behalf of Scottish Ministers.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Claire Baker MSP (on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Bo on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body whether it will consider commissioning a Scottish Parliament flag, in a similar manner to that commissioned by the House of Commons in 2021, which was designed by Graham Bartram, Chief Vexillologist of the Flag Institute, at the request of the Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle.
Answer
I thank the Member for their question. The SPCB will consider this suggestion in due course.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-24438 by Paul McLennan on 23 January 2024, what its position is on whether local community ownership of social housing asset wealth is in the interests of tenants.
Answer
The Scottish Government values the diverse social housing sector in Scotland. We support the community ownership of social housing asset wealth where the landlord meets the required legal, regulatory and financial framework and where it is in the interests of its tenants.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 24 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Graeme Dey on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an updated publication date for the Student Mental Health Action Plan.
Answer
The Scottish Government will, throughout February 2024, undertake consultation events with members of the Student Mental Health and Wellbeing Working Group on a draft Student Mental Health Action Plan.
Following this, and the completion of attendant Impact Assessments, the Scottish Government will publish the Student Mental Health Action Plan.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 25 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 7 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what powers it has to ensure that (a) social renters, (b) disabled people, (c) members of the Armed Forces, (d) veterans and (e) other people who are waiting for new homes at The Victoria development in Glasgow are compensated for their wait.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not have any powers to compensate those waiting for affordable housing for any delay that may occur in completion of any development.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Joe FitzPatrick on 6 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-24477 by Joe FitzPatrick on 18 January 2024, what its position is on whether the year-long timescale to review this planning application is acceptable, and what impact determination periods of this length have on the efficiency of (a) urban development, (b) investment and (c) economic growth in Glasgow, relative to peer cities.
Answer
Scottish Ministers intervene in only a handful of cases each year and generally only where they raise issues of national importance. These can sometimes be among the more complex planning cases which require careful consideration. Nevertheless, it is always our aim to progress cases to a decision as quickly as possible, recognising the vital role planning and the development sector play in investing and shaping our places and communities and the impact on this of unnecessary delays.
In this instance, whilst the application was called in by Ministers on 27 February 2023, it was not until mid-June 2023 that the reporter received all the relevant application information from Glasgow City Council to allow arrangements to be made to start the examination of these proposals. This information included representations from over 150 members of the public. The reporter held a hearing in September 2023 and parties final submissions were received in December 2023.
The reporter has now submitted the report and recommendation to Ministers, who will make the final decision as to whether or not planning permission should be granted for this proposed development.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 22 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jenni Minto on 5 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it (a) can take and (b) is taking to prevent the (i) sale and (ii) use of unregulated products in aesthetic treatments.
Answer
We want to ensure all non-surgical cosmetic procedures in Scotland are delivered from hygienic premises by appropriately trained practitioners, applying recognised standards and using regulated products.
The regulation of medicines and medicinal products is reserved to the UK Government and is the responsibility of the UK wide Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Any changes to regulations including the sale and use of unregulated products would require a UK wide approach and would not be devolved to the Scottish Government.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Paul McLennan on 2 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government whether it (a) can and (b) will request that the Scottish Housing Regulator publish the daily rate of each person on its statutory managers list.
Answer
The Scottish Government cannot direct the independent Scottish Housing Regulator to publish the daily rate of each person on its statutory managers list and, as such, will not be requesting that they do so.
- Asked by: Paul Sweeney, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 January 2024
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 2 February 2024
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the grid-level costs of moving to 100% renewable generation.
Answer
The responsibility for the balancing of grid lies with the National Grid Electricity System Operator and wider system integration costs are set by the regulator, Ofgem. This data is not held by the Scottish Government.
Although the Scottish Government has not made an assessment of this, evidence from the Climate Change Committee suggests that integration costs could be around £10- 25/MWh for systems with up to 50-65% renewables but could increase further at higher penetrations. However, as the Committee on Climate Change note, it is challenging to estimate system integration costs and extensive assumptions are required to do so. Estimates of system integration costs are largely reliant on modelling. More details can be found here: Technical-Annex-Integrating-variable-renewables-into-the-UK-electricity-system.pdf (theccc.org.uk) .