The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
The Faculty of Advocates and others have said that they think that the power in section 67 to give directions to the court needs to be much wider. I would be interested to get your views on that. Does the power need to be wider, or is the provision about right? Are you happy with the position as it is?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Can I just clarify a point in that respect? What if, say, one person from a couple goes into a care home for a long period of time? What happens in practice at the moment? In such cases, is any thought given to putting something in writing? If someone has been in a care home for three or four years but the other person is living at home, how do you deal with that in practice so that people do not lose out?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Picking up on that final point, we raised that with the Scottish Law Commission when we took evidence a couple of weeks ago. Its representatives were slightly sceptical of that concept, but it might be worth looking at again.
I will move on to section 67 of the bill. The Faculty of Advocates and others have said that they think that the power in that section to give directions to the court needs to be much wider than the one that currently appears in the bill. Would the other witnesses like to comment on that assessment? I will then ask Laura Dunlop to defend that position at the end.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Excellent—we almost have consensus.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I want to follow up on Mr Lamb’s point about the comparative costs between a sheriff court and the Court of Session. We have taken evidence that there is not much difference between them. Is that your experience, too?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I do not think that that has been raised before, so that is helpful. We can pursue that.
Do others have a view on that issue?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
In that case, where would you see the expenses coming from?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
We will move on to sections 7 and 12 of the bill. Under section 12, a trustee does not get to participate in trust decisions when they are incapable, while under section 7, trustees can also remove a fellow trustee from their role on the basis that that trustee is incapable. Is the balance about right in that respect? Are you happy that the definitions are up to date enough? If we could do things differently, how would we?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 9 May 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will move on to the bill’s interaction with charity law. You will be aware that the Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill is also going through Parliament. Under section 8 of that bill, the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator would have an administrative power to appoint on its own initiative interim trustees to a charitable trust. How would that work with the court’s power to appoint trustees under chapter 1 of the Trusts and Succession (Scotland) Bill? Is there an interaction?