The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
That is helpful. Just to push you slightly, do you think that there should be any delegated powers?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Okay—thanks.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I would like to go into policy, but as I cannot, I will steer away from that and not ask any more questions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Section 20(6) of the bill confers a power on the Scottish ministers to make regulations specifying other measures that they may take in relation to a legal regulator following a review of their regulatory performance. Do you have any concerns regarding the delegation and scope of that power?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Perhaps I can play devil’s advocate for a moment. What we are doing is looking at how this will happen. As Rachel Wood has said, the Government could do this through primary legislation but, as a result, the safeguard of the Lord President would not apply—the matter would simply be for the Parliament to decide. I understand the principle that you do not want this to happen, but from a delegated powers perspective, is it the case that, if it were to happen, you would want it to happen through primary legislation rather than through delegated legislation, because of the scrutiny issue? Is that right?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Can I come back on that briefly, convener?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Again, just to push you on this, the ministers have that power only if the Parliament approves the regulations and the Lord President signs them off. Is that not two safeguards? It is not that the Government is saying that it is going to do something and there is no backstop; we have two backstops, because the Parliament and the Lord President have to approve the proposal and, if either of them does not do that, it will not happen. Does that backstop of the judiciary and the Parliament having a role in the process not represent a safeguard?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I put the same question to Morag Ross, if that is okay.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will start with Gordon MacRae, because he has already had a go at this issue, although it is probably an impossible question. How should the Scottish Government involve the public more in setting the overall spending priorities? What scope is there for genuine and meaningful public engagement on that, given that, as you said, it is difficult for people to know the different lines in the budget?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I am conscious of the time, but perhaps I can have one line from either Bill Scott or Graham O’Neill. It will have to be just one line.