The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I totally understand that, but, as a member of this committee, I want to know whether in two years’ time it will be possible to say that X number of children got CDP and that, after they were transferred, X number of people now get ADP. I understand that there are different eligibility criteria, but will that monitoring be open to scrutiny so that we can see whether people’s awards are higher or lower? My concern is that there seems to be a lack of data collection in Social Security Scotland, so it is very difficult to monitor some of that. I appreciate that there are different criteria, but will we be able to see the numbers clearly in black and white?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. I feel that there is a slight sense that you are putting your head in the sand. I appreciate that we can all cite cases, but I have a constituent who applied in June whose case was not looked at until September. At that point, they—not Social Security Scotland—were asked to get the evidence. I appreciate that Twitter is not the place for everything, but the number of comments on Twitter about people’s personal experience show that the situation is not how you are recording it today.
There is a real issue with regard to the length of time that people are waiting. I appreciate that it is a different way of doing it, but for us to simply say, “We are perfect; DWP is rubbish” does a disservice to DWP, and that is also not the experience of many people who I come into contact with.
What conversations are you having with Social Security Scotland, not just to get the story that it wants to tell you but to find out about the experience of real individuals? We are all getting casework from people who say that they are having a very negative experience with Social Security Scotland. We want it to work, but it will not work if people are having that negative experience.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Convener, with regard to agenda items 2 and 3, I should put on the record that I am in receipt of personal independence payment.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Will that monitoring be published?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
If it is not Parliament or the Government that intervenes—again, you outlined some of this in your opening answer—who should have that power?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I think that Oliver Mundell has picked up most of what I was going to ask, but there is still something that I am trying to grasp. Quite a number of years ago, my father was a prosecutor for the Law Society; when he was instructed by the Law Society to prosecute a case, he just got on and did it, completely independently and without any interference. How is that different from the whole bureaucracy of having an independent person do this? Is it purely, as you have said, a perception issue? If so, it seems like a lot of money to spend on what is purely a matter of perception. I found it interesting that in your opening statement you talked about lawyers looking after lawyers. Did you get any evidence of such incidents, or is that just a perception?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Before Morag Ross comes in, I note the caveat that the Lord President would have to give consent. Does that not give you any comfort?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I turn to section 41(2) and (6). The latter, for example, gives the Scottish ministers regulation-making powers to allow category 1 regulators to extend the scope of the authorising and regulating legal businesses rules. What are your reflections on the scope of the powers in those subsections, including whether they should be necessary in practice?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Ms Wood, will you clarify something that you said? I think that you said that, if the provision in section 41(6) is to be included, any changes should be subject to primary legislation. I might have missed what you said with regard to section 41(2). I appreciate that you do not want that provision at all, but, if it is included, should any changes be made through primary legislation or should that be done through regulations? Is there no way that we can make section 41(2) acceptable to the Law Society?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 24 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you for coming, Esther. You dealt with some of this in your opening answer, but what is your view on the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill, which the Government has introduced? Perhaps you could concentrate on the delegated powers aspect.