The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I come back to the final point of my question. Obviously, regulations are subject to a lot less scrutiny by Parliament. Also, we can only say yes or no to them; there is no amending them. If replacement arrangements were required, why would they be introduced by regulation rather than through emergency primary legislation, which can be done within two or three days?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Section 41 enables the Scottish ministers to specify other regulatory matters that must be dealt with in the rules. In the evidence that we took a couple of weeks ago, the Law Society of Scotland said that that power was
“very broad and … an unwarranted extension of ministerial powers into the authorisation rules and practice rules for legal businesses.”—[Official Report, Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, 24 October 2023; c 37.]
The Law Society said that no amendment would make that power acceptable. Do you still want to keep section 41(2) in the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
To be absolutely clear, you are seeking to amend section 41(2) but you want to keep it in some form.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Do you not accept that it is an overreach of politicians into the legal world?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Section 41(6) contains a power for the Scottish ministers to make regulations to allow category 1 regulators to extend the scope of their authorised legal business rules to capture other services provided by the businesses that they regulate in addition to legal services. The Law Society has questioned what other services the Scottish Government is thinking about that the power could be used to cover and that are not already covered by legal services as defined in the bill. It is suggested that the power may allow ministers to change the definition of legal services “by the back door”. What is your response to that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I will push the minister on that. I get the feeling from that answer that they are not happy with it and want further negotiations. Is that a fair summary?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
I am reflecting on all the evidence. We are trying to future proof legislation that will probably last for several decades. Are you confident that the bill does not give too much power—not necessarily to your Government or the next Government but to Governments beyond that—to ministers, which could be misused in the wrong hands, or are you confident that safeguards are in place?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Okay; thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. That is helpful. I seek clarification on just one point. In the previous session of Parliament, the deputy convener and I had a very helpful visit to Victoria Quay, where we saw how the whole system was being designed before it was up and running. Both of us have also been to Dundee previously.
Have the changes in respect of application forms been made by officials in the Scottish Government or by the agency itself? Where does the responsibility lie for the changes that are being made now?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2023
Jeremy Balfour
In relation to the monitoring side, will Social Security Scotland monitor the number of individuals who get a different level of award on ADP than they received on CDP?