The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
How far would you expect people to travel for tribunals as the number increases?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
I have a couple of questions. The first is a bit nerdy and niche—I apologise for that. The new tribunal service has been set up, but precedent was set by cases that were taken in the previous tribunal system. Will the new tribunal system follow that precedent, or is it starting with a blank piece of paper for First-tier Tribunal decision making?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
That is absolutely fair.
The VoiceAbility submission states:
“It is possible to participate by video conference or by telephone; by paper; or rarely, in person”.
I am concerned that that wording suggests that the presumption is that in-person hearings, as you would call them, are rare, which would push the client down the route of thinking that in-person hearings will prove to be more difficult to get. Are you concerned by that wording? Could it be more explicit that the client can participate in the way that they want to, which is what the legislation says?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
Has VoiceAbility been told that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
I welcome that response. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning. I should probably put on record the fact that I am a former First-tier Tribunal member.
Ms Devlin, you said that you do not record information with regard to redeterminations. Why not?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
It seems a bit confusing that we started with a whole new system and we are not recording information from day 1. Have you got a timescale for when that information will be recorded?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
Okay. Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. I will reflect on those comments.
We took some evidence in regard to First-tier Tribunal for Scotland hearings which, as you will remember, we looked at quite carefully. The question of whether tribunals would be held face to face or done on paper was very much meant to be client led. Interestingly, a freedom of information request came back just a couple of days ago that said that there had been only one in-person tribunal in the whole of Scotland in the past year. We have heard evidence that people are finding it difficult to get a face-to-face tribunal. It is in the 2018 act that that should be the person’s choice, but if it is not happening in practice, do we need to strengthen the legislation to ensure that people are getting what they want? I do not mean that they should be forced to go in person but that, if they want to go, that is an absolute right. Can we strengthen that in the legislation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2024
Jeremy Balfour
The committee has heard objections to individuals being liable for the good-faith errors of their representative. Can the cabinet secretary explain why someone should be liable for an error that was neither their fault nor something that a person might be expected to notice?