The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1453 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have a couple of quick questions to follow up on what colleagues have asked about. Regarding the mobility component, we have talked a lot about the 20m rule. However, the legal test refers to time, distance, speed and manner. Did those other criteria come up, or does everybody just focus on the 20m rule?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
On that final point, the fact is that there are very few key performance indicators—indeed, hardly any at all. In correspondence, Social Security Scotland has told me that the system has not been designed in that way. Is it a mistake not to have KPIs? Is it worth making some investment to put the system right and ensure that, over the next 10, 20 or 30 years, we can see, say, decision times? At the moment, we have, as we have heard, no idea how long decisions take, and as far as I can see, there is no accountability with regard to whether Social Security Scotland is meeting any targets at all.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you both for your answers so far.
We do not know what the Timms review will recommend, and we do not know which recommendations from the independent review will be taken forward by the next Scottish Government. That creates uncertainty for disabled people, and uncertainty around the Scottish Government’s forward planning. Is there any way to mitigate that risk or is it just the situation that we are in?
10:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
The hardest thing for politicians is to take things away from people. Once someone has something, it is very hard to take it away. As we heard earlier, ADP is not means tested, and it was deliberately set up that way—as were its predecessors. Have you considered the idea of targeting it more to those in need, rather than making it a universal benefit?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Andrew Agapiou, do you have anything to add?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Is there anything else that you would like to comment on in part 1 of the bill?
10:00Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Colin or Andrew, do you have anything to add to that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Do you have any specific comments on part 1 of the bill? I am sorry to start with you again, David, but do you have a particular view on the proposal to abolish the postal acceptance rule? Every first-year law student learns that rule. In the 21st century, would that be a good thing to get rid of?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you. As you point out, that is probably outwith the scope of the bill, but your comments have been noted and others can consider them.
David Woods, you are the legal expert. Are you happy that parties can contract out of the provisions of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Jeremy Balfour
As David Woods mentioned, the bill is limited to reforming certain aspects of the law of contract and providing certain remedies for breach of contract. Do you think that the bill should be broader, or does it do enough?