The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
If a greater number of people were to come to an authority such as yours, what extra resourcing would you require to be able to make sure that the appropriate services and facilities were available?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Andrew Morrison, from a COSLA perspective, is having a greater geographical spread something that we should be looking to bring about by way of a policy decision? Legal advice was another issue that came up last time. People who provide legal help mostly work in Edinburgh and Glasgow and it was clear that it would be very difficult for an asylum seeker to get legal advice in more remote parts of Scotland. I do not know whether the possibility of remote consultations might have changed that and it would be interesting to get your reflections on that. However, should we be striving for greater spread, or do you think that how we are working at the moment is the right policy?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you, convener, and good afternoon, minister. Can you tell me how much money has been invested in project ADDER cities across England and Wales, and do you know what the Barnett consequentials would have been had Scotland bought into it?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
It would be helpful if you could come back to us in writing on those questions, minister.
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Finally, minister, before my time is up, what role does the third sector have? Clearly, it often works with local communities and knows those communities. Is the funding of third sector organisations, and working with them, key to your strategy in England and Wales?
Criminal Justice Committee, Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting)
Meeting date: 1 February 2022
Jeremy Balfour
The second area that I want to explore is the availability of treatment. Do you agree that, if someone wants to come off drugs and clearly needs treatment to do so, that treatment must be made available to them as soon as possible? A delay of even weeks or months on a waiting list will put people off looking for treatment. The key factor with this kind of prevention is ensuring that treatment is available when an individual wants and needs it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Jeremy Balfour
As someone who has walked this journey for five years, I will vote for the amendments, but with a heavy heart. Unlike Evelyn Tweed, I see no excitement in the regulations. Both members of this committee who are actually on PIP and who have disabilities are voting for them with a heavy heart, and that says a lot about where we are today. The disability community is accepting this because nothing else is on offer. That is not what the Scottish Government offered us five years ago.
I and Ben Macpherson sat on this committee. We heard from cabinet secretaries. We heard from civil servants. We heard from stakeholders that they wanted a system that was radically different from what we have today. We are not addressing fundamental issues, such as mobility. We are not addressing people who have variable conditions, such as MS and epilepsy, who will still not get an award. They may be told no in a nicer way, but they will still be told no.
This is a lost opportunity for the Parliament and the country. We started five years ago with a blank piece of paper, and an opportunity to design something that would have helped those with disability to get the benefits that we need and deserve. In fact, that is what we were promised by the Scottish Government, and all that we have done today is paste over what we have had for many years. I hope that the cabinet secretary and the minister, Mr Macpherson, will hear what disabled people are saying about the regulations, perhaps not in public at committees but in private. It has taken five years to get to this point. I do not particularly blame the new agency. I do think that the Scottish Government has dragged the process out and has taken far too long.
I will vote for the regulations because there is nothing else on offer and we do not want to delay anything, but I do so with no excitement and with a heavy heart. I hope that any review will be speedy and will implement the changes that people in Scotland with disability deserve.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Yes.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, convener. I add my congratulations on your appointment. I look forward to working with you. I also wish Neil Gray all the best in his new role in the Scottish Government.
I have about four or five questions to ask the minister, but I will take them one at a time so that we do not get lost in them.
My first question seeks to develop the point that was just made about case law. What is the Scottish Government’s thinking about what will happen with case law that comes in once ADP is up and running? If a case is decided in a tribunal in Newcastle that affects somebody’s mobility, will that automatically be applied to Scottish case law? How will it be implemented, and who will make that decision?
09:45