The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you, minister.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I am conscious of time, and I understand that this is a big issue, so I ask David Phillips to put some of his answer to us in writing. My specific question for him is whether any future divergence in benefit criteria can be reflected in the negotiations. If, in a year or 18 months, the Scottish Government or Parliament decides to change the mobility requirement to, say, 50m rather than 20m, with the result that many more people would be entitled, should that be reflected in the fiscal framework now, or is it simply impossible to do that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I am trying to work out where that £2.7 million is coming from. Was it sitting there for a rainy day or was it allocated for a different purpose until it was transferred, probably quite rightly, to the uprating of the benefits? How much flexibility do you have in your budget for that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I have two quick questions, minister, to get information on where we are. Back in October 2021, both Governments asked for an independent report on the fiscal framework. Will you update us on where we are with that and when we are likely to see any of the workings from the independent review come into the public domain?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, minister and officials, and thank you for coming. I will follow up briefly on my colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy’s question about the access to work scheme. That is one of those hidden secrets that a lot of people do not know about. I was interested in what the official said about trying to promote it more. Have you ever discussed a joint piece of work on that? I know that the money comes from the DWP, but it seems to me that many companies, particularly smaller and medium-sized companies, do not know about the scheme. Can you give us an idea of how the two Governments can work together to promote it better?
09:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Maybe we can take that up in a letter.
The answer to my final question might be the same. Has any thought been given to, or has the independent review been asked to look at, how any divergence within the social security system would be dealt with in the fiscal framework? Again, that might be a question for the Treasury rather than for you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you for that and for giving us your time this morning. It is much appreciated.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Thank you—that is really helpful.
My final question in this area is on the differential between the number of disabled people in employment in Scotland compared to the number in England. In Scotland, a higher number of people who are disabled are unemployed than is the case in England, and the number is growing larger. Why might that be the case? What can we do about it in Scotland, as we come out of the two-year pandemic, when disabled people might be left behind? How can we get more disabled people into safe employment that gives them an opportunity to be promoted and to be fulfilled by doing real work?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to go back to the helpful answer that we got about how access to passported benefits—I will keep calling them that for the moment, as I think that we all understand what we mean by that—is assessed.
Have there been discussions between the UK and Scottish Governments about whether access to passported benefits could be assessed in another way if PIP was not used as a criterion? Have such discussions started at ministerial or official level? Could you explain how that could happen? If we had a divergence between benefits in Scotland relative to benefits in England and Wales, are there mechanisms that we could use to allow people to still get, for example, the £10 Christmas bonus that is available to those who are on PIP at the moment, which is obviously linked to a particular benefit. Could work be done on that or would that be almost too complicated to do?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
That would be very helpful—thank you.
This next question is for Marsha Scott or Laura Tomson. It is on an issue that we could spend the next three hours discussing, so it would be good if you could limit your answers. As the convener said at the start, yesterday we had a very helpful meeting with the Lord Advocate on the issues around the criminal justice system. Obviously, there are massive issues there, some of which Marsha Scott has raised.
I realise that this is very simplistic, but if you could make one change to the system to make it more accessible and more accountable, what would it be? I know that that is a hard question to answer. I will start with Laura Tomson and Marsha Scott. If others have views, perhaps they could write to us.