The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1198 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I want to follow up on that. It is very helpful to hear that you will be carrying out a review. Roughly when will that review take place? Perhaps you can write to the committee once it has started, as I am sure that we would want to look at how the child payment is working once it has been rolled out. Do you have a rough date for when the review might happen?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
We live and breath this day in, day out, but there are lots of people out there who want that reassurance, so that is really helpful.
Could I seek clarification? You helpfully said that people who have long-term conditions will not have to go through the same assessment period for PIP as they do at the moment under the DWP. When people are transferred, if they are, say, two years away from a review, will they be told that that review will not need to take place? How will you make that decision about those who are already on PIP and are coming up for a review two or three years down the road? Will they be told at that point that the review will not take place or will that happen once everybody has been transferred?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning to the minister and his team. I have a couple of questions. First, when David Phillips, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, gave evidence to the committee, he talked about a “cliff edge” for some families, who fear losing out on their eligibility for SCP if they take on extra hours of work. I presume that now is the right time to go into it. What work are you and your team doing on that? What mitigation is there around that and what thinking is being done?
Secondly, I go back to Pam Duncan-Glancy’s question, to which I do not think that I heard an answer. Once ADP is fully transferred and is being run by Social Security Scotland, do you intend to increase that benefit as you have increased the other benefits that are now being run by the agency? Once all the transfers have taken place, do you see a further increase happening, or do you see the amount staying aligned with the UK figure?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I put on record my thanks to the kinship carers who gave evidence to us. I think that all of us who were there were deeply moved by what we heard.
I have two questions to follow up on Emma Roddick’s question. I appreciate that this is about good practice and how things work on the ground, but there is a lot of confusion around the definition of kinship care. For example, if kinship carers are defined in a certain way, they get certain benefits and help, and if they are defined in a different way, they get other benefits and face other issues. That is very confusing for those on the ground. Can further guidance be given, without legislating, in relation to the understanding of kinship care?
In our session last week, I was particularly struck by one individual who told us that two of their grandchildren were given to them because their son or daughter could not look after them. They had no follow up from social work for months—literally months—and when they did work to their house to adapt it to allow the children to stay, they were given no financial support. Such situations do not seem to be exceptional; they seem to happen a lot of the time, and part of that is down to definitions. I appreciate that that is how the system works in practice, but definitions matter, and I wonder whether further work could be done with COSLA on the support that is required. Certainly, it is inappropriate to leave a grandparent with children for several months without any follow-up at all.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Not only in kinship care but fostering, if the grandparents live in a different local authority area from the one that the child comes from, there have been issues with the fact that the local authority where the child comes from is responsible for the payment. Will that be examined? Is it a satisfactory way of working or would it be better for the local authority where the kinship carer lives to pick up the costs because it understands the child’s needs better? Is that being considered in the review, as well?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
So local authorities in Scotland will have to pay it; they will not have a choice. Is that correct?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
But not less.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
I am on PIP at the moment. How much notice will be given to people of when they will be transferred to ADP? It is quite a long time. Is transfer being carried out geographically or alphabetically? How much notice will people be given that they are transferring from the DWP to the new agency?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
When will detailed guidance on case transfer from PIP to ADP be published? Do you have a date for publishing it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 31 March 2022
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning to your team, minister. I suppose that, for the record, I should point out that I am at present on PIP and will, I hope, transfer to ADP at some point. I declare that as an interest.
I think that you said that you would lay the regulations in May. Did I hear that correctly?