The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1169 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
The total health spend is up with those additional allocations. I suppose that the point that you are driving at is about presentation and understanding—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
As was outlined previously in the emergency budget review, the £400 million comes from reprioritisation within the health and social care portfolio. Of course, savings have been made, which were identified in the EBR process. Money was returned to the centre, which was then reallocated.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
You make a fair point, convener. Under the fiscal framework in the devolution settlement, we are quite limited in our fiscal flexibilities so, ultimately, our primary means of ensuring that we can meet additional demand when it arises—for example, in relation to public sector pay requirements—is to look at reprioritisations, manage demand-led expenditure and identify savings in the context of what is more or less a fixed budget. That is just a reflection of the actual complexity of the framework within which we operate. For example, we do not have the option, which the United Kingdom Government has, to go to the Debt Management Office and simply borrow more money in year to pay for additional resource expenditure. Among a number of other reasons, that is one reason why we see that in-year complexity and the need for the budget revision process.
Niall Caldwell might want to add to that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
It does not change that, because it is non-discretionary spend. I appreciate that discretionary spend is the aspect of the budget that commands most attention, but to meet our requirements to be as transparent as possible and to meet good accounting standards, we have to present those figures in the budget and the budget revision processes.
However, I take your point. The distinction between the total managed expenditure in the Scottish budget—which, following the SBR, is just under £57.7 billion—and the discretionary spend could lead to the risk of confusion and a lack of public understanding, which I think you have articulated. I am happy to take that away.
We have to meet standards, and although it is not entirely possible to simplify the accounts for the Scottish Government, I recognise that what you suggest is possible. Scenarios have arisen where certain figures that were perhaps misleading have been deployed for political purposes. I am conscious that that has happened in the past in Parliament.
I am certainly happy to write back to the committee to provide more detail on the specific budget lines that you identify. The work that we do on the guide to the budget revisions is on-going, and I am keen for continuous learning to refine that to make sure that it is as useful and helpful to the committee and other stakeholders as possible. I will also take away the broader point about how we present our budgets to ensure that there is as much clarity as possible and that they are as discernible as possible for the layperson who is not a practising accountant.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
I will come back to you on that point; I cannot give you a direct answer.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
As that is a technical question, I ask Niall Caldwell to answer it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
Yes—work is being done in the relevant divisions that lead in the area. Notwithstanding the points that have been raised, they are taking forward the relevant work so that in future years there will be greater uptake of the schemes.
If there is a desire for more specific information on that particular policy lead and the nature of the work that is taking place to incentivise uptake, I will be happy to provide that in writing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
I will get back to you in writing on that, Mr Lumsden.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
Yes. That just reflects the fact that we are no longer in the European Union. These are figures that would have accrued to us, but because we are not in the EU, we have had to write that funding off and find the funding ourselves.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 March 2023
Tom Arthur
The nature of this is such that, in seeking to balance the budget, that will inevitably generate some carry-forward, but the exact quantum will, of course, not emerge until the end of the financial year.