Skip to main content

Language: English / GàidhligDark Mode

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 691 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

“Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin 2023/24”

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Alexander Stewart

You have also touched on the amount of debt that councils are managing. In the bulletin, you say that councils’ debt stands at almost £20 billion, which is a 15.8 per cent increase on the level of debt in 2022-23. That is a substantial amount of money and a substantial increase. At what point do the levels of debt become unsustainable for councils to manage? Are there any councils that you think are moving towards having a worrying level of debt that causes even more concerns about their ability to provide best value in the communities that they represent?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

“Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin 2023/24”

Meeting date: 4 February 2025

Alexander Stewart

You did, convener.

When we are trying to manage this process, we are all about the transformation of best value, good practice and value for money, together with the empowerment and engagement that you have talked about.

When it comes to ring-fenced money, that is sometimes allocated as a one-off or a special offer, and the money does not always get used because it might not fit the criteria of the local authority or area. That money sometimes disappears and is not used, which causes a problem for us in providing best value for money. Communities want to engage and to be empowered, but, at times, there seems to be an obstacle. My reading of the situation is that the obstacle is sometimes ring-fenced funding. Certain funding might not tick all the boxes that councils want, so they might have to use a different avenue or route to receive funding. I have seen that cause frustration in councils.

It would be good to hear your views on how we should resolve that situation, because, if we were able to unlock some funding, there would once again be more opportunities and more finance to use for communities’ priorities.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

Sai, perhaps we could hear your views on that.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

Roy, do you have anything that you want to add?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

Thank you, everyone, for the questions and comments so far. Despite Brexit, inward mobility from the EU is still possible, with 20 per cent of Erasmus+ funding being spent by third countries. Just fewer than 34,000 people took part in higher education mobility, but we still do not have any data on that for Scotland. The Turing scheme differs in that it offers mobility worldwide, whereas 80 per cent of Erasmus+ awards had to be in Europe. Again, Scotland-specific data is unavailable. Why is the data unavailable? Who needs to process it so that we can get clarity? It seems that there is data from other parts of the process, but I am a bit unclear about why we do not have data. Perhaps Ms Jackson can answer the specific question, because it relates to your processes.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

It is about SEEP.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

I want to ask about the proposed Scottish graduate visa scheme. It would be useful to hear all our witnesses’ views on the idea of a tailored visa route for graduates from universities and colleges who want to stay in Scotland. Is there a willingness and a way forward for that? What might be the pros and cons of such a scheme? Could it unravel or could it progress? Would there be barriers to its succeeding? Perhaps Lesley Jackson could start and then we could go around the table.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

Sarah Paterson, do you want to add anything, or are you content with what has been said?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

It appears that the process is disadvantaging institutions and that they are struggling to cope with the parameters that are being set. That must have a massive impact on the students who are trying to go through the processes. My question is for Sai. If the institutions cannot get clarification, it must be even harder for the students to process some of that and come through the minefield that is in front of them in order to progress.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 30 January 2025

Alexander Stewart

Okay. Thank you, convener.