The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 691 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
I think that further information is required in order for us to continue with the petition. I suggest that we write to the Scottish Government to seek its response to the recommendations that are proposed by the Scottish Law Commission in its report on cohabitation and the timetable for bringing forward legislation in that area. I also suggest that we write to the Scottish Law Commission to seek information on what consideration has been given to the use of judicial discretion as part of the review on aspects of family law. In addition, I suggest that we write to the Law Society of Scotland and Family Law Association to seek their views on the issues that are raised by the petitioner. I think that all of those suggestions have some merit.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
It was about the further developments that are planned and about how families who are affected by suicide are supported.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
The profession says that the licensing scheme is unworkable in the situation. It has indicated that it is completely unworkable because the birds are not able to “exhibit normal behaviour patterns.” You indicated that 21 licences have been issued, which is a small number.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
Do you not believe, minister, that that is a very small number of licences to have been issued for that whole profession?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
It is imperative that we write to the Scottish Government to ask for its view on whether there are differences, as the petitioner indicates, in the considerations that are given to local knowledge and scientific knowledge. We should also ask how it ensures that people with poor internet access, particularly in rural areas, are given the opportunity to respond to public consultation and what changes the Government intends to make in its practices, including the development of the delivery of conservation policy, following the representations in the report of the independent working group.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
It would also be useful to write to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service to seek information about the number of cases of motorcycle theft in each of the past five years and the outcomes of those cases.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
You have touched on population issues. We know that NHS boards with larger populations have mental health assessment units that are available 24/7. That is really useful for larger populations, but the issue is in trying to evaluate these services, cabinet secretary. Is the Scottish Government looking to make it much more of a national service? You have touched on the issue of rural areas, where, as you have identified, it is a much bigger challenge for you to make that happen. There is a disparity between what happens in urban areas and what happens in rural areas, which do not have the same support and opportunities, and patients might fall through the gap.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
This has been an eye-opening session, minister, and I am staggered at some of the responses so far—at the complete lack of understanding of the situation and circumstances that we have heard.
On the licensing system, the Scottish Government says:
“The Scottish Government believes that the licensing scheme for the control of mountain hares … does not impact on the ability of falconers to enable their birds to exhibit normal behaviour patterns.”
We have heard that the licensing scheme is completely and utterly unworkable, so do you believe that statement? It is not the position of the profession, which is able to understand what is taking place, but the Scottish Government fundamentally believes that it is the case. Do you still believe that it is?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
In the submission that the Scottish Government made to the committee in March, you committed to consulting with stakeholders in justice and health to establish the best methods of recording how many requests for prescribed medication had been made by individuals in custody, and whether those requests had been met. Can you give us an update on any progress on that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Alexander Stewart
Thank you for coming to the meeting.
You talk about rurality. Is it not the case that, in some situations and circumstances, there are opportunities to develop processes? Have you given any feedback on the fair fares review, which the Scottish Government is using to look at concessionary travel? Have you been involved in any consultation on that review or had other involvement with it?