Seòmar agus comataidhean

You have spoken about success and there is no question that there have been successes. What is the working relationship between the Government, the Scottish Refugee Council and COSLA? You have said that you want to take a targeted approach in dealing with local authorities. How successful has that been? That was very successful in the initial stages, when a large number of people needed, and were given, support. How has that progressed since then? Are you now finding barriers within certain local authorities that are not able to give as much support now as they did in the past?

What is your response, Christopher? As you said, America has so much to offer on so many levels.

Katrine, what is your main priority in Copenhagen?

To make everything work, we need to have the resources, manpower and finances. We have touched on short and medium-term financial planning for the organisation and how it will progress. If it does not have financial stability, it will not be able to achieve some of the goals that it is trying to achieve. You have indicated that the Government is supportive of where the organisation wants to go, but there still seems to be a gap between the aspirations for the organisation and where we want to go with the strategy, and the financial situation. The aims of the strategy can be achieved only if it is backed up by funding from local government, national government, sponsorship, entrepreneurs or individuals who give legacies.

Without that, the strategy will not succeed, and the areas that have more engagement and financial support will manage much better than those on the periphery. You talked about the centre of the country—Edinburgh and Glasgow—having more of these places. However, in rural areas, we have many local attractions and institutions that are trying to support them. In the past, we have talked about sponsorship and how that is managed, and about people volunteering and giving their time and talents to ensure that something is restored or kept within a community. However, without financial back-up, that becomes a mountain for those organisations to climb. It would be useful to hear your views on some of that.

Thank you.

In your opening statement, you spoke about effective engagement, collaboration and partnership. All of those things are vital.

Last week, we had the opportunity to hear from Alex Paterson and Dr Adam Jackson about effective engagement and their belief that it is crucial for the strategy to succeed. However, one of the difficulties that has arisen is that there is sometimes not really effective engagement by local authorities. Some local authorities might well be supportive whereas others are not. There was talk about a local authority historic environment group, but that did not succeed in becoming a useful structure. That is seen as a potential barrier to engagement in local authorities.

How important should that role be for local government? If local authorities work in collaboration and partnership, things work well, but if they do not, there is a gap, and that gap creates complexities for the sector. The strategy will not succeed if co-operation and engagement do not take place.

I have a question about accountability and delivery. Last week, Mr Paterson told us that ways to measure the success of the strategy are “built in”. However, when I asked about what data is being used, our witnesses were not convinced that all the data that they need is being provided by all the groups in the sector. Therefore, how will the Scottish Government monitor HES’s performance in delivering the strategy? We are not clear about what the process will look like.

Good morning. It is a pleasure to be back among you but, for the first time, on the other side of the table. In the previous parliamentary session, I was a co-convener of the cross-party group on heart disease and stroke.

I would like to speak in support of James Bundy’s petition on the review of the FAST stroke awareness campaign. I commend James and his family for the fantastic work that they have done to date in bringing this petition to the Parliament and highlighting where we are.

The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament

“to urge the Scottish Government to increase awareness of the symptoms of stroke by reviewing its promotion of the FAST stroke campaign, and ensuring that awareness campaigns include all the symptoms of a potential stroke”.

There were 11,055 reported strokes in Scotland in 2022, which is an increase on 2021. The latest data from the year ending 31 March 2022 reported 3,836 deaths in which cerebrovascular disease, including stroke, was the underlying cause. The current test that is used to assess patients who are suspected of having suffered a stroke is, as we have heard, the FAST test. Although that test can identify most strokes, patients can also present with other less common symptoms. The crux of the petition is those less common symptoms that can occur in some individuals and which can, unfortunately, mean misdiagnosis or delays in treatment. That was very much the case for Mr Tony Bundy, who died at the age of 53.

As you said, convener, in 2021, a systematic review of evidence found that the FAST test accurately detected 69 to 90 per cent of strokes but that, crucially, the test missed up to 40 per cent of posterior circulation strokes, such as the ischaemic stroke that Mr Bundy suffered.

That issue has also been identified by the national advisory committee for stroke, which stated the importance of education for health professionals, including in circumstances where there is a negative FAST test. That is what we are talking about here: education is required for the professionals who deal with these situations.

I firmly endorse the calls from James Bundy and his family for a review of the FAST test, an evidence session with the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee and a debate in the chamber in the future. That would help the family to see how the process is moving forward, because it is clear that, in this circumstance, the test was not fit to identify a stroke. It is important that we address that for the future.

I commend and congratulate the Bundy family on the petition following their terrible loss. They wish to support others in that situation so that this will not happen to other families. I support the petition and I am delighted to be here.

As you identified, how you deliver, manage and measure success is vitally important. Sometimes, that comes down to the data that you use. You will always receive certain data because of the nature of the business that you are involved in. However, some aspects are a little bit more technical or about what the environment has to offer. That might not be as easy to measure, depending on how you progress that work.

How do you make your way through that little minefield so that you can collect the right data that will give you the correct information and enable you to put forward a strategy or idea and set out how far you will go on an issue because of what you have been told? If you are not told about something and you do not measure what is happening, how can you then encapsulate that? You have already said today that you have fingers in many pies. It is about managing things so that the data that you receive gives you the best measurement of the progress that you are making, which in turn gives you the opportunity to succeed.

That has to be the approach. If you are to reach your ultimate goal, you must ensure that that framework is there.

All that comes down to resource and financing. In the strategy, you have given some ideas as to the progress that you want to see and have identified elements as priorities. However, there are also aspects of the strategy that you want to do but might not be able to do because you are constrained by, for example, time, geography or the finances behind that.

How do you balance those elements to ensure that you achieve what you want to and that your strategy succeeds? In some ways, if it does not go as far as it can, it will fail.