The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 938 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
We will move on to Meghan Gallacher, who joins us remotely.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
Item 3 is formal consideration of a Scottish statutory instrument. When the committee previously considered the Building (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2025 on 18 November, we agreed to seek further information from the Scottish Government following a submission that we received from the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland. We have now received the Government’s response.
As members do not have any comments, does the committee agree that we do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Alexander Stewart
Thank you for your answers this morning. I would like to touch on one area before we finish. You have given us a good overview of where the organisation is, what you are trying to achieve and where you are going. However, complaints about SPSO services themselves are potentially problematic and they are at a record high. It would therefore be good to get a flavour of where you see those complaints going and how you manage them as an organisation. That is an area that you will require to tackle.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
Good morning, Edel. The independent review reported clients’ positive views on consultations. Would greater use of consultations improve decision making? Are poor experiences of PIP assessments preventing the use of what could be a useful part of the decision-making process?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
The idea about the process being personalised comes out quite strongly in the review, which found that people wanted more personalised and accessible communication from Social Security Scotland. They saw that as an advantage. How important is that for people and how can it be achieved? That is a goal, but it is also something that Social Security Scotland is attempting to do.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
It is important to note that the Scottish Government’s choices, criteria and policy decisions are encouraging more people to come forward. There is no doubt about that, which must have a knock-on effect on how much this will cost. If people feel that dignity, respect and fairness are there, more will take up the opportunity to apply, as the system might not be seen as being as draconian or strict as it used to be. They might not have chosen to come forward in the past due to stigma and difficulties. The Government must take that into account and come to a conclusion about how this should be progressed and managed.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
Stephen, in your opening remarks, you talked about funding gaps and a demand-led budget and service. Around £320 million more is likely to be spent on ADP than the Scottish Government receives in PIP block grant adjustment. You have touched on that this morning. We have also touched on the likelihood of the forecast gap of £770 million being closer to £400 million by 2029-30. It would be good to get a flavour of Audit Scotland’s conclusions on how the Scottish Government is managing the funding gap. You have given us a flavour of when you look at the figures and how you manage that, but it is a considerable sum of money and it is probably going to continue to grow.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
You have already touched on negative press about the code, and you have talked about the work of the code and surveying it. Authorities provide training for councillors, through the monitoring officer, and political groups also try to give them guidance—a group leader or deputy leader will try to support their council colleagues if they need it. There may well even be an internal appraisal system within the council group as to how councillors are performing or behaving, to manage the behaviour or ability to progress of anyone who may need more training.
You have talked about the surveys you have done in the past and the one you are planning to do in the future. It would be good to get a flavour of what you see the survey attempting to do. Will it try to ascertain whether there is a knowledge gap, or will it try to find out whether there are areas for improvement that need to be re-examined to ensure that there is a transparency when it comes to understanding the code?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
One thing that has an impact on training is the time that is taken up by the process of dealing with, for example, a breach of the code, as people know that it could be some time before there is a resolution. People might be put off if they think that it will take two or three years for the case to come to a resolution, so there is no point in engaging in training, as things will have moved on. Alternatively, they might still feel that they want some kind of action at the end of that process. How do you address that?
10:45Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Alexander Stewart
How damaging is the negative publicity about the code? Does it have a reputational impact?