The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 29 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Deputy First Minister, Murdo Fraser brought to our attention what I think is the most striking admission in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night—that Scotland, when it introduces vaccination certification, will be the only country in Europe to bring in such a scheme in isolation, without a requirement for testing. Murdo Fraser asked you about that, and I wrote down part of your answer. You said that the Government did not want to undermine vaccination uptake.
Do you have empirical evidence from other European countries that have brought in certification in tandem with testing requirements that suggests that vaccination uptake has been inhibited by that combination of measures?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
That seems slightly at odds with the messaging in the Government’s evidence paper, which was published last night.
In section 5.1, which is about the basis for the introduction of vaccination certification, the very first bullet point is about reducing transmission. Increasing vaccine uptake is ancillary to that—it is the fourth bullet point. I recognise that—
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 30 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I am more than happy to concede on that.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
I will be very brief, convener, and I am grateful to you for letting me in.
In the interests of time, I will ask a couple of yes or no questions. Professor Montgomery, you referred in your opening remarks to a festival in Cornwall called, I think, Boardmasters, that required vaccination passports for entry. Nevertheless, 5,000 people still got sick. Was there a requirement to provide evidence of a negative lateral flow test at that festival, too?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Thank you very much.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Okay. That was very helpful. So, even though everyone knew that everyone else was double-jabbed and people were presenting their lateral flow test results, 5,000 people still got sick. It just shows that this is not a foolproof approach.
Judith Robertson, you made it very clear—indeed, I wrote it down—that states and Governments can set aside their duty to act compatibly with rights such as the right to family life, privacy and freedom of thought only if it were necessary to address a pressing social need. What if the Government does not act compatibly with those rights and does not present any evidence that such a move is necessary to address a social need? Is there a sanction that would apply?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
From what you have said today, you do not seem to be satisfied that—as yet—you have seen sufficient evidence from the Government that the measure is necessary to address a very pressing social need. In fact, we have seen from the festival in Cornwall evidence to the contrary that it does not actually do so. What evidence would satisfy the requirement to set aside those very important human rights?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
This is obviously a very controversial issue; indeed, the Night Time Industries Association has just mounted a legal challenge against the proposal. If the Government were to be found sitting on compelling empirical evidence that suggests that the measure is an effective means of addressing this very pressing social need, would that surprise you? After all, if I was in Government and had that evidence, I would rush it out and put it to the fore.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Alex Cole-Hamilton
Thank you, convener. I am grateful to be here. I have no interests to declare.